Representation of power of first Tudors in new political history
Abstract
The article discusses the possibility of studying the representation of the royal power of the first Tudors period in England in line with one of the fastest growing areas of historical science - the new political history. At the present time researches on new political history are in demand both in the British and Russian historiography. The sphere of scientific interests of historians is now not so much the ideas, texts, traditions, but its’ special political language that helps to define the intellectual context, which served as the basis for it and in the developing of which they have played an important role. The author concludes that methods of political history allow the formulation of new issues and new challenges in the context of the representation of power, involving new types of sources and application of methods of related humanitarian sciences.
About the Author
D. V. Kiryukhin
Nizhny Novgorod State Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in History, Associate Professor of the Department “Foreign Languages”,
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Kirjuhin D.V. Strategija reprezentacii korolevskoj vlasti v kul'turnoj i intellektual'noj zhizni anglijskogo dvora v 1485–1533 gg. Dis. kand. ist. nauk: 07.00.03. [The strategy of royal power’s representation in the cultural and intellectual life of the English court in 1485–1533. Cand. hist. sci. diss.] N.Novgorod, 2014. 178 p. (In Russian)
2. Repina L.P. Istorija istoricheskogo znanija: posobie dlja vuzov [The history of historical knowledge: Manual for high schools]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Drofa, 2006. 288 p. (In Russian)
3. Repina L.P. Social'naja istorija i istoricheskaja antropologija: novejshie tendencii v sovremennoj britanskoj i amerikanskoj medievistike [Social history and historical anthropology: the latest trends in contemporary British and American medieval studies]. Odissej. Chelovek v istorii. Moscow, Nauka Publ, 222 p. (In Russian)
4. Teorija i metodologija istoricheskoj nauki. Terminologicheskij slovar' [Theory and methodology of the historical sciences. Terminological dictionary]. Chubar'jan A.O., eds. Moscow, Akvilon, 2014. 576 p. (In Russian)
5. Hachaturjan N.A. Suverenitet, zakon i «vsja obshhina»: vzaimodejstvie i dihotomija vlasti i obshhestva [The sovereignty of the law and “the whole community”: interaction and dichotomy of power and society]. Vlast', obshhestvo, individ v srednevekovoj Evrope. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2008. pp. 5-8. (In Russian)
6. Ridell J.E. “A Mirror of Men”: Sovereignty, Performance and Textuality in Tudor England, 1501–1559. Ontario: The Press of Queen’s University, 2009. 359 p.
7. Starkey D. The English Court from Wars of the Roses to the Civil War. L.: Longman, 1987. 273 p.
Review
Views:
753
Email this article 