Expert knowledge as a key factor in integration of the professional community of artists

Introduction. The content of the concept of "expert knowledge" and its composition are the subject of numerous discussions concerning its essence and composition, the form of linguistic representation, as well as combination with other types of knowledge in the activities of specific communities. The empirical experience of the authors' research of artistic communities shows that the creative and instrumental activities of members of artistic communities combine elements of different types of knowledge, primarily scientific, specialized, everyday, artistic, of which expert knowledge is currently described least fully, while it is this kind of knowledge that contributes to the integration and self-awareness of artistic communities. The description of the activities of artistic communities in this way requires clarification of the composition and existential characteristics of expert professional knowledge.

Materials and methods. The presented research is based on philosophical ideas about empirical knowledge, its essence and forms of existence, methods of abstraction and analysis, comparative method, elements of the biographical method, content analysis of sites of artistic professional communities are used.

Results. Expert knowledge is mainly empirical in nature, and the real forms of its existence allow us to assert its specific logical-epistemological and socio-communicative foundations. The former correspond to the forms of existence of empirical knowledge adapted to a specific type of activity (facts, patterns, laws, phenomenological theories specific to this type of activity), the latter are determined by the functional role of the subject in the process of artistic production and reproduction and are presented in the form of tasks of storing and distributing specialized knowledge, presenting expert knowledge in the world of everyday operations, forming and maintaining the unity of the artistic community. The successful solution of the tasks set allows us to assert that the community, as a collective subject of activity, has a specific communicative rationality that allows not only to make decisions of an instrumental nature, but also to form specific moral conventions governing issues of collective and individual responsibility.

Discussion and conclusions. The study of expert knowledge in the context of the activities of the artistic community makes it possible to clarify the characteristics of expert knowledge, determine its role in the processes of self-regulation of the artistic community, and also raise the question of the processes of interaction of different types of knowledge in the activities of the community and its individual representative.

1. Alekseeva E. A., Medvedev A. O. On the relationship between the concepts of "scientist" and "expert". Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya, 2023, no. 3, pp. 90-102, doi: 10.31249/scis/2023.03.05. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-sootnoshenii-ponyatiy-uchyonyy-i-ekspert (accessed: 13.07.2024). (In Russ.)

2. Aleshinskaya E. V. Theoretical and methodological foundations of delimitation of genres of professional discourse. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya, 2014, no. 5 (31), pp. 5-23. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teoretiko-metodologicheskie-osnovy-razgranicheniya-zhanrov-professionalnogo-diskursa/viewer (accessed: 17.07.2024). (In Russ.)

3. Apel' K. O. Transformation of Philosophy. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2001. 344 p. (In Russ.)

4. Bochkareva O. V. Musical discourse in the context of the modern media space. YAroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 2021, no. 1 (118), pp. 170-177, doi: 10.20323/1813-145X-2021-1-118-170-177. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/muzykalnyy-diskurs-v-usloviyah-sovremennogo-mediaprostranstva (accessed: 23.07.2024). (In Russ.)

5. Burd'e P., Boltanski L., Kastel' R., SHamboredon ZH.-K. Public Art: An Essay on the Social Use of Photography. Moscow, Izdatel'skaya i konsaltingovaya gruppa «Praksis» Publ., 2014. 456 p. (In Russ.)

6. Val'ran V. N. Soviet Photography, 1956-1986. Moscow, Lyudi i knigi Publ., 2023. 736 p. (In Russ.)

7. All about Saxophone and Clarinet Reeds. Magazin «Sax Market.ru»: sajt, 2020, March 18. URL: https://saxmarket.ru/blog/detail/vsye-o-trostyakh-dlya-saksofona-i-klarneta/ (accessed: 17.07.2024). (In Russ.)

8. Ganskaya E. N. Soviet rock journalism as a peripheral practice. Russkaya rok-poeziya: tekst i kontekst, 2023, issue 23, pp. 5-16. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovetskaya-rok-zhurnalistika-kak-periferiynaya-praktika (accessed: 17.07.2024). (In Russ.)

9. Golovanova E. I. Reflection of professional perception of the world in oral communication of photographers. Vestnik CHelGU, 2011, no. 24, pp. 208-211. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otrazhenie-professionalnogo-vospriyatiya-mira-v-ustnoy-kommunikatsii-fotografov (accessed: 20.07.2024). (In Russ.)

10. Guk A. A. Mosaic nature of contemporary photographic art as a set of artistic strategies and subcultures. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv, 2023, no.3 (113), pp. 51-58, doi: 10.24412/1997-0803-2023-3113-51-58. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mozaichnost-sovremennogo-fotograficheskogo-iskusstva-kak-sovokupnost-hudozhestvennyh-strategiy-i-subkultur (accessed: 17.07.2024). (In Russ.)

11. Zappa F. The True Book of Frank Zappa. Moscow, EKSMO Publ., 2003. 396 p. Available at: https://www.kuzmitch.ru/zappabook/i-only_about_music.html (accessed: 25.07.2024). (In Russ.)

12. Ignatova A. S. Photographic "Underground" as a Factor in the Information Revolution in the Domestic Media Culture of the 20th Century. CHelovek v mire kul'tury, 2017, no. 2-3, pp. 160-163. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/fotograficheskiy-andegraund-kak-faktor-informatsionnoy-revolyutsii-v-otechestvennoy-mediakulture-xx-veka (accessed: 20.07.2024). (In Russ.)

13. Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. Moscow, AST Publ., 2020. 784 p. (In Russ.)

14. Kart'e-Bresson A. Imaginary Reality. St. Petersburg, Moscow, Limbus Press Publ.; OOO «Izdatel'stvo K. Tublina» Publ., 2008. 128 p. (In Russ.)

15. Kasavin I. T. Parascience. Enciklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. Moscow, «Kanon+» Publ.; ROOI «Reabilitaciya» Publ., 2009. Pp. 689-691. Available at: https://gtmarket.ru/concepts/6962 (accessed: 30.06.2024). (In Russ.)

16. Koshelev A. A., Ivchenkova M. S. Expert knowledge as a social phenomenon: theoretical and methodological analysis. Nauka. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo, 2022, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 36-43, doi: 10.19181/nko.2022.28.4.3, edn qacnzm. (In Russ.)

17. Koshovec O. B. Economic knowledge and power: from scientific objectivity to technologies of impersonality and social construction. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 2022, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 171-189, doi: 10.5840/eps202259113. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekonomicheskoe-znanie-i-vlast-ot-nauchnoy-obektivnosti-k-tehnologiyam-impersonalnosti-i-sotsialnomu-konstruirovaniyu (accessed: 06.07.2024). (In Russ.)

18. Krasikova K. V. Photography as a part of media culture. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie, 2022, no. 46, pp. 83-99, doi: 10.17223/22220836/46/7. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/fotografiya-kak-chast-mediakultury (accessed: 17.07.2024). (In Russ.)

19. Levashov V. G. Lectures on the history of photography. Moscow, Trimedia Kontent Publ., 2014. 464 p. (In Russ.)

20. Lukoyanova T. V. Frame structuring of specialized knowledge. Lingvistika i obrazovanie, 2020, no. 1, pp. 38-49. Available at:https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/freymovoe-strukturirovanie-spetsialnogo-znaniya (accessed: 30.06.2024). (In Russ.)

21. Malyutin M. A. Special knowledge as a sign of expertise. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, no. 3 (139), pp. 95-100. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/spetsialnye-znaniya-kak-priznak-ekspertizy (accessed: 02.07.2024). (In Russ.)

22. Manik S. A., Grigoryan A. A. Discourse of the musical: definition and characteristic features. Sovremennye issledovaniya social'nyh problem, 2020, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 143-163, doi: 10.12731/2077-1770-2020-6-143-163. (In Russ.)

23. Martishina N. I. Phenomenon and typology of pseudoscientific knowledge. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putej soobshcheniya, 2013, no. 29, pp. 19-28. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/fenomen-i-tipologiya-okolonauchnogo-znaniya (accessed: 23.07.2024). (In Russ.)

24. Mihajlova M. A., Il'duganova G. M., Vahitova R. I. Semantic organization of thesauri of Russian-speaking and English-speaking photographers. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2023, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1294-1298. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/semanticheskaya-organizatsiya-tezaurusov-russkogovoryaschih-i-anglogovoryaschih-fotografov (accessed: 23.07.2024). (In Russ.)

25. Molotkov V. V., Manilov V. A. Technique of jazz accompaniment for a six-string guitar. Minsk, Publishing house of D. M. Shabatura, 2019. Pp. 5, 21. (In Russ.)

26. Morozova E. V. On the development of the terminology of the jazz genre in the first half of the twentieth century in the English-language media discourse. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Rossijskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya, 2022, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 42-53, doi: 10.17072/2073-6681-2022-2-42-53. Available at:https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-razvitii-terminologii-zhanra-dzhaz-v-pervoy-polovine-xx-veka-v-angloyazychnom-diskurse-smi (accessed: 17.07.2024). (In Russ.)

27. Pruzhinin B. I. The Phenomenon of “New Knowledge” in the Conceptual Grid of the Philosophy of Science. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya, 2020, vol. 36, issue 3, pp. 473-483, doi: 10.21638/spbu17.2020.305. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/fenomen-novogo-znaniya-v-kontseptualnoy-setke-filosofii-nauki (accessed: 06.07.2024). (In Russ.)

28. Svetlichnyj A. A. On the issue of the debatable nature of the concept of "special knowledge". Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, 2012, no. 1-2, pp. 279-286. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-diskussionnosti-ponyatiya-spetsialnye-znaniya (accessed: 24.06.2024). (In Russ.)

29. Stigneev V. T. The Age of Photography, 1894-1994: Essays on the History of Russian Photography. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2005. 389 p. (In Russ.)

30. Terekhova L. A. Special knowledge in evidentiary activity. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 2014, no. 4 (41), pp. 136-140. Available at:https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/spetsialnye-znaniya-v-dokazatelstvennoy-deyatelnosti (accessed: 02.07.2024). (In Russ.)

31. Habermas YU. Moral consciousness and communicative action. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2001. 382 p. (In Russ.)

32. CHmyreva I. YU. Lexicon of Russian photography of the XX-XXI centuries. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2022. 824 p. (In Russ.)

33. CHmyreva I. YU. Essays on the history of Russian photography. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2016. 552 p. (In Russ.)

34. Erman V. A., Ermakova A. V. Music review as an interdiscursive text. Crede Experto: transport, obshchestvo, obrazovanie, yazyk, 2018, no. 1, pp. 85-94. Available at:https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/muzykalnaya-retsenziya-kak-interdiskursivnyy-tekst (accessed: 17.07.2024). (In Russ.)

35. Couturier E. Talk about contemporary photography. Paris, Flammarion; London: Thames & Hudson, 2012. 254 p.

36. Durden M. Photography Today: A History of Contemporary Photography. PHAIDON, 2014. 464 p.

37. Hetmański M. Expert knowledge: its structure, functions and limits. Studia Humana, 2018, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 11-20, doi: 10.2478/sh-2018-0014.

38. Holm G. Photography as a performance. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2008, vol. 9, no. 2, art. 38, pp. 1-21. Available at: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/394/857 (accessed: 23.07.2024).

39. Hordern J. Specialized, systematic and powerful knowledge. London Review of Education, 2021, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.14324/LRE.19.1.06.

40. Horn A., Urias E., Klein J. T., Hess A., Zweekhorst M. Expert and non‑expert at the same time: knowledge integration processes and dynamics in interdisciplinary teamwork. Sustainability Science, 2023, vol. 18, pp. 2357-2371, doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01365-6.

41. Jabłońska B. Muzyka jako forma politycznej deliberacji i dyskursywnej argumentacji: refleksje socjologiczne. Dialogi Polityczne, 2022, vol. 1, no. 32, pp. 135-150, doi: 10.12775/DP.2022.006.

42. Maina K. Expertential knowledge as a musical resource. PAN Africal journal of musical arts education, 2024, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.58721/pajmae.v2i1.519.

43. Majdańska-Wachowicz U. Recenzja muzyczna w uwikłaniach dyskursywnych. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica, 2019, vol. 53, pp. 99-112, doi: 10.18778/0208-6077.53.09.

44. Schmitt A. The I of the Photographer: A Historical Perspective. The Photographer as Autobiographer. London, Palgrave MacMillan, 2022. Pp. 15-64. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08855-1.

45. Wood P. Study of the Photographer as a Study: Looking Inside Duncan Winder's Home (sometime between c1962 and 1965). Architectural History Aotearoa, 2022, no. 19, pp. 38-60, doi: 10.26686/aha.v19i.8048.