Essential characteristics of the concept of "research thinking of a teacher" and approaches to its study in domestic and foreign science
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2025-13-1-6
Abstract
Introduction. Human cognitive abilities are currently in the epicenter of attention of many specialists. It happens because of strengthening of their role in improving the efficiency of life activity of both a particular person and society as a whole in conditions of its increasing complexity. The problem of teacher's research thinking development is considered as one of the most important cognitive abilities. Its solution can contribute to improving the efficiency of education and, consequently, the quality of society's intellectual potential. This article focuses on exploring the concept of teachers' research thinking and its development as discussed by both domestic and foreign scholars. The goal was achieved through the use of theoretical research methods such as conceptual analysis, synthesis, and comparative-historical analysis. The article emphasizes the importance of studying the essence and content of “research thinking” for teachers and its role in enhancing their professional effectiveness.
Materials and methods. To achieve the goal, authors created a theoretical basis for the study, including different literary sources (both domestic and foreign). On its basis authors performed such methodological functions as critical (it allowed to identify differences and peculiarities of the essence of the concept under consideration in the approaches of different scientists, to reveal cause-and-effect relationships in different approaches to analyzing the essence of the key concept of this study), explanatory (contributed to deepening the understanding of the nature of research thinking) and synthesizing (led to the emergence of a new definition of the concept of “research thinking of a teacher?”). To realize these functions, such methods of theoretical research as analysis and synthesis, as well as comparative-historical analysis were used.
Results. Through careful analysis, the article identifies the most significant features of research thinking and provides the author's own definition of the concept.
Discussion and conclusions. By examining different methodologies utilized in both Russian and international research, a chronological order was established to showcase the progressive contributions made by scientists in shaping the fundamental nature of research thinking. This analysis unveiled the evolutionary trajectory of its essential attributes. Through meticulous analytical endeavors, the most significant defining features were identified, culminating in the author's precise formulation of the concept. The authors' definition can influence the research methodology, helping to clarify the understanding of its essence in the academic and scientific environment, as well as influence educational programs, methods and technologies for research thinking development.
About the Authors
L. R. KhaliullinaRussian Federation
Liliya R. Khaliullina – Elabuga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University".
Elabuga
Scopus ID 57222878142, Researcher ID O-2725-2016
N. N. Savina
Russian Federation
Nadezhda N. Savina – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Elabuga Institute (branch) of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University".
Elabuga
Scopus ID 57216261489, Researcher ID O-3548-2016
References
1. Alekseeva E. S. Methodological designer for the development of enterprising thinking and behavior / edited by T. V. Svetenko. Pskov, Sterh Publ., 2013. 304 p. (In Russ.)
2. Amonashvili SH. A. Teacher from God. Moscow, Amrita Publ., 2018. 88 p. (In Russ.)
3. Anufriev A. F. Development of diagnostic thinking of student teachers-psychologists using automated case systems for psychological and pedagogical diagnostics. Kollekciya gumanitarnyh issledovanij, 2021, no. 4 (29), pp. 20-27. (In Russ.)
4. Belyalova M. A. Research thinking and research skills of a student in ensuring the quality of modern vocational education. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal eksperimental'nogo obrazovaniya, 2014, no. 10, pp. 78-81. (In Russ.)
5. Belyalova M. A. Formation of research skills of students in the educational process of the university: dissertation of the candidate of pedagogical sciences: 13.00.01. Krasnodar, 2002. 139 p. (In Russ.)
6. Borovkova E. S., Rebro I. V., Mokrecova I. S. Formation of research thinking in students through participation in the research work of the university. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya, 2012, no. 5, p. 98. (In Russ.)
7. Burshit I. E. On the importance of developing engineering thinking of preschool and primary school children. Preemstvennost' mezhdu doshkol'nym i nachal'nym obrazovaniem: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii ot 24 marta 2017 goda. Taganrog, 2017. 218 p. (In Russ.)
8. Vil'keev D. V. Problem lecture on pedagogy at the university. Sovetskaya pedagogika, 1989, no. 3, pp. 103-107. (In Russ.)
9. Gorbenko M. G. Pedagogical principles of formation of research skills and abilities in art classes in senior grades (From the experience of Russian and international education): dissertation of the candidate of pedagogical sciences: 13.00.08. Moscow, 2006. 199 p. (In Russ.)
10. Doncova T. V., Arnautov A. D. Formation of engineering thinking in the process of project activity. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie, 2014, no. 16, pp. 70-75. (In Russ.)
11. D'yui Dzh. Reconstruction in philosophy. Problems of man / trans. from English, afterword and notes. L. E. Pavlova. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2003. 494 p. (In Russ.)
12. Zagvyazinskij V. I. Research activities of the teacher: a teaching aid for university students studying in the specialty "Pedagogy". Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2006. 173 p. (In Russ.)
13. Innovative Russia: Challenges of the Time. Available at: https://alt.ranepa.ru/pressroom/news/innovatsionnaya_rossiya_vizovi_vremeni_5219.html (accessed: 25.11.2024). (In Russ.)
14. Kaverin YU. A. Research activities of the teacher in the system of continuous education as a factor in the development of pedagogical skills. Upravlencheskaya deyatel'nost' rukovoditelej obshcheobrazovatel'nyh uchrezhdenij po realizacii prioritetnogo nacional'nogo proekta «Obrazovanie»: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Voronezh, VOIPKiPRO Publ., 2008. Pp. 251-256. (In Russ.)
15. Kalinin P. E., Majorova N. S., Sitnova E. V. Development of the research style of students' thinking. Nauchnyj poisk, 2012, no. 4, pp. 12-15. (In Russ.)
16. Klimova T. E. Development of the research culture of the teacher: dissertation of the doctor of pedagogical sciences: 13.00.01. Orenburg, 2001. 328 p. (In Russ.)
17. Kraevskij V. V., Berezhnova E. V. Basics of educational research activity: study guide. 10th ed., reprinted. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2015. 124 p. (In Russ.)
18. Kudrova I. A. Formation of ideas about the modern scientific picture of the world in the process of research activities of students: dissertation of the candidate of pedagogical sciences: 13.00.01. Moscow, 2007. 149 p. (In Russ.)
19. Lozinskij M. The art of poetic translation. Translation as a means of mutual rapprochement of peoples. Collection of articles. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987. 201 p. (In Russ.)
20. Lotman YU. M. Works on sign systems, I. Tartu, 1964. 198 p. (In Russ.)
21. Lukackij M. A. Pedagogical science: history and modernity: a teaching aid. GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2012. 448 p. (In Russ.)
22. Methodology of science: research programs / ed. S. S. Neretina. Moscow, IFRAN Publ., 2007. 255 p. (In Russ.)
23. Letter of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated November 15, 2023 No. MN-5/203212 "On the direction of methodological recommendations for the training of teaching staff" (together with the "Methodological recommendations for the training of teaching staff based on unified approaches to their structure and content of educational programs of higher education (bachelor's degree and (or) basic higher education) ("Core of Higher Pedagogical Education")"). Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_474683/ (accessed: 25.11.2024). (In Russ.)
24. Panov V. I. Ecopsychology: paradigmatic search. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2014. 304 p. (In Russ.)
25. Petrova N. V. Psychological and pedagogical essence of the research culture of the individual. Vestnik Adygejskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Pedagogika i psihologiya, 2007, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologo-pedagogicheskaya-suschnost-issledovatelskoy-kultury-lichnosti (accessed: 28.11.2024). (In Russ.)
26. Petrova O. G. Lecture 1. Educational and research activity. Available at: https://www.pinterest.com.mx/pin/483785184955698112/ (accessed: 25.07.2024). (In Russ.)
27. Polyakov E. N. Pedagogical experience and its study. Sovetskaya pedagogika, 1950, no. 6, pp. 3-15. (In Russ.)
28. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated February 22, 2018 No. 121 “On approval of the federal state educational standard of higher education - bachelor's degree in to the board of training 44.03.01 Pedagogical education" (with amendments and additions) Edition with amendments No. 1456 dated 11/26/2020. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_293567/2ff7a8c72de3994f30496a0ccbb1ddafdaddf518/ (accessed: 25.11.2024). (In Russ.)
29. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated February 22, 2018 No. 125 "On approval of the federal state educational standard of higher education - bachelor's degree in the direction of training 44.03.05 Pedagogical education (with two training profiles)" (with amendments and additions) Edition with amendments No. 1456 dated 11/26/2020. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/71897864/ (accessed: 25.11.2024). (In Russ.)
30. Savenkov A. I. Psychological foundations of research-based learning for schoolchildren. Fizika: prablemy vykladannya, 2007, no. 3, pp. 14-24. (In Russ.)
31. Sepik D. Competitiveness of regions: some aspects. Reports of the RECEP. 2004. No. 2. Pp. 47-93. (In Russ.)
32. Slavin A. V. The problem of the emergence of new knowledge. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976. 294 p. (In Russ.)
33. Harchenko L. N. Teacher of a modern university: competence model: monograph. Moscow, Direkt-Media Publ., 2014. 217 p. (In Russ.)
34. Hill T. I. Modern theories of knowledge. Moscow, PROGRESS Publ., 1965. 534 p. (In Russ.)
35. CHervonnyj M.A. The principle of historicism in the formation of a natural-scientific worldview in physics lessons: dissertation of the candidate of pedagogical sciences: 13.00.02. Tomsk, 1999. 162 p. (In Russ.)
36. SHvab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2016. 138 p. (In Russ.)
37. SHCHedrovickij G. P. Organizational and Activity Game: A Collection of Texts. Moscow, Nasledie MMK Publ., 2005. 320 p. (In Russ.)
38. SHCHedrovickij G. P. The Scheme of Mental Activity – Systemic and Structural Structure, Meaning, and Content. Moscow, 1995. P. 281. (In Russ.)
39. Ellis A. Psychotraining Using the Albert Ellis Method. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 1999. 141 p. (In Russ.)
40. YUlov V. F. Activity of Natural-Scientific Consciousness. Moscow, Prometej Publ., 1990. 200 p. (In Russ.)
41. YUlov V. F. Scientific thinking: monograph. Kirov, Sankt-Peterburgskij gumanitarnyj universitet profsoyuzov Publ., 2007. 252 p. (In Russ.)
42. Belanger J. Teachers as researchers: Roles and expectations. An annotated Bibliography. ERIC, 1992. 60 p.
43. Burns T.C., Fuster M.V. 2020. Back to the future of education: Four OECD scenarios for schooling. 2020. 76 p. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/education/back-to-the-future-s-of-education-178ef527-en.htm (accessed: 25.11.2024).
44. Clark A., Erickson G. Teacher inquiry: What’s old is new again! BC Educational Leadership, 2006, no. 1, pp. 44-68.
45. Darling-Hammond L., Baratz-Snowden J. (Eds.). A good teacher in every classroom: preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. San Francisco, Jossey – Bass, 2005. 87 р.
46. Denicolo P. M., Kompf M. Teacher Thinking and Professional Action. Taylor Francis, 2015. 284 p.
47. Diezmann C. M. Growing scholarly teachers and educational re-searchers: A curriculum for a research pathway in pre-service teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 2005, no. 33 (2), рр. 181-193.
48. Ellis A. How to Stubbornly Refuse to Make Yourself Miserable about Anything, Yes Anything. Sydney, Pan Macmillan, 1988. 232 p.
49. Fleck L. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einf. in die Lehre vom Denkstil u. Denkkollektiv. Moscow, Suhrkamp, 1993. 189 p.
50. Frey C.B., Osborne M.A. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Elsevier, 2017, no. 114 (C), рр. 254-280.
51. Girdzijauskaite E.; Radzeviciene A.; Jakubavicius A. Impact of international branch campus KPIs on the university competitiveness: FARE method. Insights into Regional Development, 2019, no. 1 (2), рр. 171-180, https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.2(7).
52. Gomm R., Hammersley M. Research and practice: Two worlds forever at odds? Educational Research: Policymaking and Practice / Ed. M. Hammersley. London, Paul Chapman Publishing, 2002. Pp. 59-82.
53. James W. Psychology: The Briefer Course. New York, H. Holt & Co., 1950. 504 р.
54. Kincheloe J. Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. 2nd ed. London, Routledge, 2002. 304 р. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203497319.
55. Kroll L. R., Meier D. R. Educational Change in International Early Childhood Contexts: Crossing Borders of Reflection Routledge. New York, Routledge, 2014. 200 p.
56. Kumar R. Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (4th ed.). California Thousand Oaks, SAGE, 2014. 366 p.
57. Loughran J. J., Mitchell I. J., Mitchell J. M. Learning from teacher re-search. New York, Teachers College Press, 2002. 274 р.
58. Mackenzie P. Inquiry Mindset Assessment Edition: Scaffolding a Partnership for Equity and Agency in Learning. Elevate Books Edu; Assessment ed. edition, 2021. 264 p.
59. Mackenzie P. Inquiry Mindset: Nurturing the Dreams, Wonders, and Curiosities of Our Youngest Learners. EdTechTeam, 2018. 224 p.
60. MacLean M., Mohr M. Teachers researchers at work. Berkeley. Ca: National Writing Project, 1999. 290 p.
61. Murdoch K. How do inquiry teachers….teach? Available at: https://www.kathmurdoch.com.au/blog/2014/02/21/how-do-inquiry-teachers-teach (accessed: 25.11.2024).
62. Nightingale. Developing a research mindset part 2 – startups. 2023. Available at: https://nightingaledesignresearch.com/insights/developing-a-research-mindset-part-2-startups/ (accessed: 25.11.2024).
63. Oganisjana K., Svirina A., Surikova S., Grīnberga-Zālīte G., Kozlovskis K. Engaging universities in social innovation research for understanding sustainability issues. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 2017, no. 5 (1), рр. 9-22, https://doi:10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1(1).
64. Peim N. Thinking in Education Research: Applying Philosophy and Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018. 296 p.
65. Peirce Ch. S. Pragmatism as a Principle and Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism. SUNY Press, 1997. 305 р.
66. Research Mindset for Data Scientists: The “First Principle”. 2023. Available at: https://towardsdatascience.com/research-mindset-for-data-scientist-the-first-principle-thinking-c7842bc70d93 (accessed: 25.11.2024).
67. Senan N. A. M. Developmental review program impact on enhancing the effectiveness of "teaching and learning" in accounting program: A case study in a saudi university. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 2018, no. 6 (2), рр. 1001-1017, https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(35).
68. Seredkina A. S., Fedotova E. L., Nikitina E. A., Kazorina A. V., Shirina, A. A. Formation of the future teacher’s readiness to work with gifted children. SHS Web of Conferences, 2021, no. 101, рр. 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110103008.
69. Shkedi A. Worlds colliding and communicating: Teachers’ responses to educational research. Qualitative Research in Education / Ed. A. Shai. Jerusalem, David Yelin Education College. (In Hebrew), 2000. Рр. 19-50.
70. Silander Т., Valijarvi J. The Theory and Practice of Building Pedagogical Skill in Finnish Teacher Education. Meyer H.-D., Benavot A. PISA, Power, and Policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Symposium Books Ltd., 2013. Рр. 85-86.
71. Taylor R. Creativity at Work: Supercharge Your Brain and Make Your Ideas Stick. Кogan Page Publishers, 2013. 208 p.
72. The future of education and skills Education 2030. 2018. 23 p. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf (accessed: 25.11.2024).
73. Thompson G. The Global Report on the Status of Teachers. Published by Education International, 2021. 124 p.
74. Viehweg T. Ideologie und Rechtsdogmatik. Baden-Baden, 1995. 113 р.
75. Viehweg T. Systemproblem ein Rechtsdogmatik und Rechtsforschung. Baden-Baden, 1995. 240 р.
76. Zeichner K. Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 2007, no. 58 (1), рр. 36-46.