Features of attention and memory of students – generation Z in the context of digitalization

Introduction. The modern information world has made adjustments to the development of cognitive functions of generations. Many researchers have noted a decrease in memory, attention, and thinking abilities. To a lesser extent, the attention of generation Z (2000-2018 years of birth), especially students, is being studied. More attention is paid to the peculiarities of the attention of schoolchildren. The presented research aims to study the features of attention and some types of memory of 1st and 2nd year students. A review of the literature indicates that representatives of generation Z are immersed in the digital environment in the process of studying at a university and this leaves a certain imprint on their cognitive processes. It is noted that young people have high distraction, reduced concentration, high dependence on electronic games, visually oriented in the learning process.

Materials and methods. The following methods were used in the study: for the study of attention – a "Proof-reading test", the method of "Arranging numbers"; for the study of short-term auditory, RAM - a "Double test". The respondents are 370 people – university students of the 1, 2 year, age 17-19 years, Rostov-on-Don.

Results. As a result, the average performance indicators of attention have been established. The accuracy of attention in the groups is mostly above average. But compared to the 2016 study, the accuracy is reduced. The stability of concentration is high in groups, but in 2016 it was much higher. The arbitrariness of attention in the average groups was below average, and it is lower compared to the 2013 study. High rates of operational and short-term auditory memory of students have been established. The productivity of attention was higher among 2nd year students.

Discussion and conclusions. The conclusions noted that the flow of information in which students exist and study is large, fatigue and anxiety of students are high, which can reduce attention indicators. It is proposed to organize classes with students on information content management. In order not to be overloaded, which in turn will develop the possibilities of students' attention.

1. Makarova N. G. Study of students' attention properties: stability, concentration, distribution. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya: problemy i rezul'taty, 2013, no. 6, pp. 76-80. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-u-studentov-svoystv-vnimaniya-ustoychivost-kontsentratsiya-raspredelenie (accessed: 16.04.2024). (In Russ.)

2. Nemcev O. B., Gadzhimirzoeva N. A., Grekalova I. N., Nemceva N. A., Kucherenko YU. O. Stability of some indicators of attention in high school students. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P. F. Lesgafta, 2016, no. 3, pp. 301-305. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/stabilnost-nekotoryh-pokazateley-vnimaniya-u-starsheklassnikov (accessed: 16.04.2024). (In Russ.)

3. Collection of psychological tests. Part II: manual / compiled by E. E. Mironova. Minsk, ZHenskij institut ENVILA Publ., 2006. 146 p. (In Russ.)

4. Smirnova YA. K. The role of the "model of the mind" in the coordination and unification of attention in the orienting part of the joint activities of preschoolers. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2018, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 11, doi: 10.26795/2307-1281-2018-6-3-11. (In Russ.)

5. SHevel' T. M., Falikman M. V. “Glance cue” as a key to the mechanisms of joint attention: main research results. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya, 2022, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 6-16, doi: 10.17759/chp.2022180101. (In Russ.)

6. Bjelajac Ž., Filipović A. M., Stošić L. V. Internet Addiction Disorder (IAD) as a Consequence of the Expansion of Information Technologies. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 2022, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 155-165, https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-3-155-165.

7. Boström L., Damber U., Collén C. University students’ study strategies before and during the pandemic: Experiences from Swedish students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2023, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 100543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100543.

8. Brenner C. A. Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learn. Environ, 2022, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5.

9. Dautov D., Korochentseva F., Al Hussini M.K. Features of clip thinking and attention among representatives of generations X and generations Z. SHS Web Conferences. Trends in the Development of Psycho-Pedagogical Education in the Conditions of Transitional Society (ICTDPP-2019), 2019, vol. 70, p. 006001, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197006001.

10. Fergus T. A., Limbers C. A. Reducing Test Anxiety in School Settings: A Controlled Pilot Study Examining a Group Format Delivery of the Attention Training Technique Among Adolescent Students. Behavior Therapy, 2019, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 803-816, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2018.12.001.

11. García-Carrión B., Barrio-García S.D., Muñoz-Leiva F., Porcu L. Effect of social-media message congruence and generational cohort on visual attention and information-processing in culinary tourism: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 2023, vol. 55, pp. 78-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.03.006.

12. Liu M., Zuo J., Tao Y., Zhao L., Wu S., Feng L., Liao L. Influencing factors of learning sustained attention for nursing students in online settings: A structural equation model. Nurse Education Today, 2022, vol. 111, p. 105248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105248.

13. Liu Y., Sun X., Zhang P., Han P., Shao H., Duan X., Jiang J. Generation Z nursing students’ online learning experiences during COVID-19 epidemic: A qualitative study. Heliyon, 2023, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e14755, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14755.

14. Martin-Perpina M. M., Poch F. V., Cerrato S. M. Media multitasking impact in homework, executive function and academic performance in spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 2019, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 81-87, https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.178.

15. Moser J. S., Moran T. P., Leber A. B. Manipulating Attention to Nonemotional Distractors Influences State Anxiety: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Low- and High-Anxious College Students. Behavior Therapy, 2015, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 834-843, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2015.07.001.

16. Mrazek A. J., Mrazek M. D., Brown C. S., Karimi S. S., Ji R. R., Ortega J. R., Maul A., Carr P. C., Delegard A. M., Kirk F. C. Attention training improves the self-reported focus and emotional regulation of high school students. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2022, vol. 3, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000092.

17. Robb M., Shellenbarger T. The distracted online student: Strategies to capture attention and promote connection. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 2021, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 389-392, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2021.05.008.

18. Sharma M., Kaushal D., Joshi S. Adverse effect of social media on generation Z user's behavior: Government information support as a moderating variable. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2023, vol. 72, p. 103256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103256.

19. Smith D. D., Meca A., Bottenhorn K. L., Bartley J. E., Riedel M. C., Salo T., Peraza J. A., Laird R. W., Pruden S. M., Sutherland M. T., Brewe E., Laird A. R. Task-based attentional and default mode connectivity associated with science and math anxiety profiles among university physics students. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2023, vol. 32, p. 100204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2023.100204.

20. Soldatova G. U., Nikonova E. Yu., Koshevaya A. G., Trifonova A. V. Media multitasking: from cognitive functions to digital. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 8-21, https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090401. (In Russ.)

21. Taner H. A., Sarı B. S., Kulaçoğlu K. C., Mayalık A., Mecit H., Özekicioğlu K., Zorbaz Z. O. Internet gaming disorder’s correspondence with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and game/in-game purchases among university students. Entertainment Computing, 2022, vol. 42, p. 100486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2022.100486.

22. Twenge J. M. iGen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. New York, NY, Atria, 2017. 342 p. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12345.

23. Uzdil N., Günaydın Y. The effect of sense of coherence on mindful attention awareness and academic self-efficacy in nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 2022, vol. 64, p. 103429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103429.

24. Wang Z., Yuan R., Luo J., Liu M.J., Yannopoulou N. Does personalized advertising have their best interests at heart? A quantitative study of narcissists’ SNS use among Generation Z onsumers. Journal of Business Research, 2023, vol. 165, p. 114070, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114070.

25. Yang J., Zhang Y., Pi Z., Xie Y. Students’ achievement motivation moderates the effects of interpolated pre-questions on attention and learning from video lectures. Learning and Individual Differences, 2021, vol. 91, p. 102055, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102055.

26. Yun M.R., Shin N., Kim H., Jang I.S., Ha M.J., Yu B. Effects of School-Based Meditation Courses on Self-Reflection, Academic Attention, and Subjective Well-Being in South Korean Middle School Students. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 2020, vol. 54, p. e61-e68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.05.002.