Digitalization of education: problems and prospects

Introduction. The article analyzes the process of digitalization of modern education. The relevance of the study is determined by the special role of education in the life of modern society, based on the principles and values of the post-industrial era. The quality of human potential and people's readiness to face natural and social challenges largely depend on the effectiveness of the education system. In the process of improving national education, modern technologies are becoming more and more important every year, the introduction of which contributes to the modernization and development of education, as well as improving the quality of training of future specialists and bringing education closer to science. At the same time, such technologies require a review of existing approaches to educational activities, as well as an analysis of their impact on society and individual social groups. In this regard, the study of the digitalization of education and its social consequences is a very relevant area of research. The purpose of this study is to identify the main problems and determine the prospects for digitalization in education.
Materials and methods. To achieve this goal, we used methods of dialectics of social cognition, analysis of philosophical, sociological, and pedagogical literature, and synthesis and modeling of socio-cultural processes.
Results. The conclusions identify the main problems of digitalization of education: the dehumanization of educational, and then all other social relations, the possible deepening of the crisis of people's intellectual culture, their ability to create, the growth of pragmatism and individualism based on the values of personal comfort and selfish consumption. Prospects for the development of digitalization in the education system are outlined: instrumental - equipping educational institutions with high-quality software, information systems that provide access to educational resources, the introduction of information (distance) technologies, online learning, changing requirements for teachers and students, the formation of new organizational educational structures, inevitable changes in the usual forms and methods of training and value-semantic – finding a harmonious unity with the best traditions of domestic education.
Discussion and Conclusions. These conclusions are aimed at solving practical issues related to the implementation of the state policy of digitalization of various spheres of public relations. They can help coordinate the efforts of scientists, politicians, and civil society institutions to promote the socio-economic and cultural development of our society. The results obtained allow us to approach the fundamental problems of managing the cultural policy of modern society more objectively and meaningfully. They are designed to stimulate the creation of new forms of culture based on the priorities of harmonizing national cultural characteristics and the specifics of the world's techno-scientific processes.

1. Ahromeeva T.S., Malineckij G.G., Posashkov S.A. The meanings and values of digital reality: the future. War. Synergetics. Filosofskie nauki, 2017, no. 6, pp. 104-120. (In Russ.)

2. Bodrijyar ZH. In the shadow of the silent majority, or the End of the social. Yekaterinburg, Publishing House of the Ural University, 2000.96 p. (In Russ.)

3. Budanov V.G. A new digital life techno-structure - prospects and risks of transformations of the anthroposphere. Filosofskie nauki, 2016, no. 6, pp. 47-55. (In Russ.)

4. Dubrovskij D.I. Electronic culture. Who is against? Filosofskie nauki, 2017, no. 2, pp. 50-57. (In Russ.)

5. Ivanova V.P., Eremenko V.V. The intellectual culture of a digital society. Cifrovoe obshchestvo kak kul'turno-istoricheskij kontekst razvitiya cheloveka: sbornik nauchnyh statej / pod obshch. red. R.V. Ershovoj. Kolomna, Gosudarstvennyj social'nogumanitarnyj universitet Publ., 2016. Pp. 151-155. (In Russ.)

6. Il'in I.A. I peer into life: Book of reflection. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007.526 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kutyrev V.A. On the fate of management and law in the digital society. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii, 2019, no. 1(45), pp. 278-281. (In Russ.)

8. Luman N. The reality of mass media. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2005. 256 p. (In Russ.)

9. Maklyuen M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Becoming of Man Printing / Translation by I.O. Tyurina. 2nd Edition. Moscow, Akademicheskij Proekt Publ., Gaudeamus Publ., 2013. 496 p. (In Russ.)

10. Markuze G. One-dimensional man. Eros i civilizaciya. Odnomernyj chelovek: issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial'nogo obshchestva / per. s angl. A.A. YUdina; sost. V.YU. Kuznecova. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. Pp. 251-515. (In Russ.)

11. Maslanov E.V. Digitalization and development of information and communication technologies: new challenges or aggravation of old problems? Cifrovoj uchenyj: laboratoriya filosofa, 2019, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6-21. (In Russ.)

12. Macheret D.A. "Digital socialism" or the expansion of individual freedom? Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 2019, no. 2, pp. 54-65. (In Russ.)

13. Petrunin YU.YU. Artificial intelligence: the key to the future? Filosofskie nauki, 2018, no. 4, pp. 96-113. (In Russ.)

14. Rakitov A.I. Man in the digitized world. Filosofskie nauki, 2016, no. 6, pp. 32-46. (In Russ.)

15. Stepin V.S. Civilization and culture. St. Petersburg, SPbGUP Publ., 2011. 408 p. (In Russ.)

16. Toffler E. Shock of the future: translation from English. Moscow, AST: AST MOSKVA Publ., 2008. 557 p. (In Russ.)

17. Tul'chinskij G.L. Digital Transformation of Education: Challenges to Higher School. Filosofskie nauki, 2017, no. 6, pp. 121-136. (In Russ.)

18. Tul'chinskij G.L. Digital humanism. Filosofskie nauki, 2018, no. 11, pp. 28-43. (In Russ.)

19. Fortunatov A.N. Media Reality: Captured by Techno-Humanism. Nizhny Novgorod, NNGU Publ., 2009. 212 p. (In Russ.)

20. Frankl V. Man in search of meaning. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. 368 p. (In Russ.)

21. Fromm E. Revolution of hope / translation from English, foreword by P.S. Gurevich. Moscow, Ajris-press Publ., 2005. 352 p. (In Russ.)

22. Halin V.G., CHernova G.V. Digitalization and its impact on the Russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie, 2018, no. 10, pp. 46-63. (In Russ.)

23. CHernyshov A.G. Strategy and philosophy of digitalization. Vlast', 2018, no. 5, pp. 13-21. (In Russ.)

24. SHmidt E., Koen Dzh. The New Digital World. How technology is changing people's lives, business models and the concept of the state / translation from English by S. Filin. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., 2013. 368 p. (In Russ.)

25. Barglow R. The Crisis of the Self in the Age of Information: Computers, Dolphins and Dreams. London – N.Y.: Routledge, 1994. 227 р.

26. Broadbent S. Approaches to Personal Communication. Horst Н.A., Miller D. (eds.) Digital Anthropology. London, Berg, 2012. Рp. 127-146.

27. Cross J. An informal history of eLearning. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240601967_An_informal_history_of_eLearning (accessed: 20.04.2020).

28. Ivashevsky S.L. Education and ideology. Russian education and society, 2011, vol. 53, no. 6, pр. 42-48.

29. Gryaznova E., Kozlova T., Sulima I. Forming and realizing a pedagogue’s philosophical culture. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication-TOJDAC, 2018, special edition, pp. 2136-2142.

30. Horst H.A. New Media Technologies in Everyday Life. Horst Н.A., Miller D. (eds.) Digital Anthropology. London, Berg, 2012. Рp. 61-79.

31. Kaplan J. Humans need not apply: A guide to wealth and work in the age of artificial intelligence. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2015. 256 p.

32. Lundie D. The givenness of the human learning experience and its incompatibility with information analytics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2017, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 391-404, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1052357.

33. Malsch Т. Sozionik: Soziologische Ansichten über Künstlicher Sozialität / Ed. by T. Malsch. Berlin, Edition Sigma, 1998. 393 p.

34. Miller D., Horst H.A. The Digital and the Human: A Prospectus for Digital Anthropology. Horst Н.A., Miller D. (eds.) Digital Anthropology. London, Berg, 2012. Рp. 3-38.

35. Negroponte N. Being Digital, First Vintage Books. Available at: http://governance40.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Nicholas-Negroponte-Being-Digital-Vintage-1996.pdf (accessed: 20.04.2020).

36. Polletta F. Participatory Enthusiasms: A Recent History of Citizen Engagement Initiatives. Journal of Civil Society, 2016, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 231-246, https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1213505.

37. Sonnemann U. Negative Anthropologie. Versuch einer Sabotage des Schick-sals.Reinbek bei Hamburg, Rowohlt, 1969. 137 р.

38. Smith A. Is There A Global Culture? Intermedia, 1992, vol. 20, no. 4-5, pp. 11-12.

39. Vaidhyanathan S. The Googlization of everything: (and why we should worry). Univ of California Press, 2012. 280 p.

40. Turkle S. Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, Basic Books, 2011. 384 p.