Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

Psychological image of childhood characteristic of modern schoolchildren’s parents

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2019-7-4-11

Abstract

Introduction: psychological image of childhood is considered as a set of parents’ social representations about the value of childhood as a period of life, the purpose and the point of education, the future they want for their children, social and cultural resources of the family. We have assumed that the subjective image of childhood determines the educational trajectory parents choose for their child and becomes relevant in a situation of choice. We present the results of a three-year-long empirical research on structure and content of social representations about the main components of childhood characteristic of the parents whose children move up to a new stage of education: enter primary school, move to secondary school and graduate from secondary school.

Materials and research methods: the research was carried out in the framework of the structural approach by J.-C. Abric, developed in line with the conception by S. Moscovici. As the main methodological technique, we used the method of prototypical analysis of free associations by P. Verges.

The results of the research: it has been found out that parents’ psychological image of childhood is stable in the part which is based on the stereotypes and cultural traditions of the society, as well as on their own life experience. Another part of the childhood image, that is more mobile and variable, reflects the changes associated with the age-related needs of the children as well as the parents’ goals.

Discussion and conclusion: we have confirmed the hypothesis that parents whose children go to schools that implement educational programs of different complexity have different representations about the values and goals of childhood as a life period. Based on the data received, we have reconstructed descriptive models of childhood image that are characteristic of parents who choose schools with different requirements for children’s intellectual and psychological development: ordinary secondary schools or educational institutions having high rating positions.

About the Author

A. D. Andreeva
FGBNU “Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education”
Russian Federation

Andreeva Alla Damirovna – PhD in Psychology, Head of the Laboratory of the Scientific Foundations of Applied Child Psychology

Moscow



References

1. Abul'hanova-Slavskaya K.A. Social thinking of personality. Sovremennaya psihologiya. Sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanij. CHast' 3. Social'nye predstavleniya i myshlenie lichnosti. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2002. Pp. 88-103. (In Russ.)

2. Andreeva A.D. Parental perfectionism as a motivational basis for the upbringing and education of children. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental'naya psihologiya, 2015, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 40-48. (In Russ.)

3. Andreeva G. M. Psychology of social cognition. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2000. 288 p. (In Russ.)

4. Andreeva G.M. Social cognition and social problems. Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2013, no. 1(9), pp. 39-49. (In Russ.)

5. Berulava G.A. The image of the world as a mythological symbol: a textbook. Moscow, Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii Publ., 2001. 45 p. (In Russ.)

6. Bovina I.B. Strategies for the study of social representations. Sociologicheskij zhurnal, 2011, no. 3, pp. 5-23. (In Russ.)

7. Brushlinskij A.V. Social psychology in Russia and the theory of Serge Moscovici. Moskovichi S. Vek tolp. Istoricheskij traktat po psihologii mass. Moscow, 1998. Pp. 5-21. (In Russ.)

8. Emel'yanova T.P. The construction of social representations in the context of the transformation of Russian society. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2006. 400 p. (In Russ.)

9. Emel'yanova T.P. Social representations - tools for the analysis of social phenomena in a transitional society. Konstanta v neopredelennom i menyayushchemsya mire. Moscow,: MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova Publ., 2010. Pp. 217-228. (In Russ.)

10. Leont'ev A.N. The image of the world. Mir psihologii, 2003, no. 4, pp. 11-18. (In Russ.)

11. Minigalieva M. Social representations: structures and characteristics. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012.257 p. (In Russ.)

12. Moskovichi C. Social representations: a historical view. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 1995, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3-18. (In Russ.)

13. Abric J-C. A Structural Approach to Social Representations. Deaux K., Philogène G. (eds) Representations of the Social: Bridging Theoretical Traditions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001. Рp. 42-47.

14. Doise W., Spini D., Clemence A. Human rights studied as social representations in a cross-national context. European journal of social psychology, 1999, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-29.

15. Foster J. Unification and differentiation: a study of the social representations of mental illness. Papers on Social Representations, 2001, vol. 10, pp. 3.1-3.18.

16. The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, J.Valsiner. Cambridge University Press, 2015. 498 p.

17. Vergès P. L’Evocation de l’argent: une méthode pour la définition du noyau central d’une representation. Bulletin de psychologie, 1992, vol. XLV, no. 405, pp. 203-209.


Review

Views: 1109


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)