Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

Language as a reflection of person’s cognitive status in late adulthood

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2019-7-2-9

Abstract

Introduction: topical for present-day psychology problem of psychological peculiarities of persons at the age of late adulthood is considered in the article. Possibility to use language and speech as a basis for cognitive functioning study is considered as well. Thought-language problem is traditional for psychology but the main scope is of theoretical character. The proposed study is an empiric one.

Materials and methods: a number of procedures have been used to reveal interrelations between language and different types of thinking (divergent, convergent and conceptual). J. Guilford’s test was used for divergent thinking, R. Kettell’s Culture-Fair Intelligence Test, CFIT was used for convergent thinking and B.V. Zejgarnik’s test for conceptual one. Stroop’s test was used for cognitive flexibility measurement. Direct association test and Chain association test were used for language study. 84 respondents aged 25-84 participated in the study. By means of cluster analysis they were divided into four groups with average of 28,6, 52,4, 64,9 and 75,8 years.

Results: comparative analysis reveals statistically significant differences only for paradigmatic reactions. Factor and regression analyses were used for analysis of interrelations between language and different types of thinking.

The results showed that only characteristics of convergent thinking correlate with language indices that characterized its complexity.

Discussion and Conclusions: dynamic characteristics of language correlate with person’s cognitive flexibility. But these dynamic characteristics do not change with person’s age and their use for thinking diagnostic in late adulthood is disputable. 

About the Authors

E. Yu. Shurupova
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Shurupova Elena Yuryevna – lecturer.

Moscow.



N. B. Karabuschenko
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Karabuschenko Natalya Borisovna – D.Sc. (Psychology), Professor, Head of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogics.

Moscow.



References

1. Belovol Е.V. The manifestation of the properties of temperament in the acoustic characteristics of speech: the author's abstract of the thesis of the candidate of psychological sciences. Moscow, 1999. 24 p. (In Russ.)

2. Belovol Е.V., Bojko Z.V., Radysh I.V., SHurupova Е.YU. Improving the quality of life and the dynamics of cognitive processes as a result of training in the "third age". Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya Psihologiya i pedagogika, 2015, no. 4, pp. 77-84. (In Russ.)

3. Belovol Е.V., SHurupova Е.YU. To the problem of experimental study of formed speech in psychology. Procedury i metody eksperimental'no-psihologicheskih issledovanij / otv. red. V.A. Barabanshchikov. Moscow, Publishing House "Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 2016. Pp. 39-45. (In Russ.)

4. Bojko Z.V., Belovol Е.V., Radysh I.V. Aejism as a psychological problem of the XXI century. Gumanitarnij visnik DVNZ «Pereyaslav-Hmel'nic'kij derzhavnij pedagogichnij universitet imeni Grigoriya Skovorodi». Dodatok 4 do Vip. 31, Tom I (9): Tematichnij vipusk «Mizhnarodni CHelpanivs'ki psihologo-pedagogichni chitannya». Kiev, Gnozis, 2014. Pp. 120-124. (In Ukrainian)

5. Boldyryov N.N. Cognitive linguistics: A course of lectures on English philology. Tambov, TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina Publ., 2002. 123p. (In Russ.)

6. Bolotnova N.S. Philological analysis of the text: a textbook. Moscow, Flinta Publ., Science Publ., 2009. 520 p. (In Russ.)

7. Buras M., Krongauz M. Life and fate of the hypothesis of linguistic relativity. Nauka i zhizn', 2011, no. 8. Available at: https://elementy.ru/nauchno-populyarnaya_banglioteka/431377/Nauka_i_zhizn_8_2011 (accessed: 05.03.2019). (In Russ.)

8. Vygotskij L.S. Thinking and speaking. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2019. 432 p. (In Russ.)

9. Galunov V.I., Manerov V.H., Tarasov V.I. . Auditory analysis of speech obtained using various methods of modeling emotional states. Rech' i emocii: materialy simpoziuma. Leningrad, 1979. Pp. 79-83. (In Russ.)

10. Luriya A.R. Speech and thinking. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1975. 120 p. (In Russ.)

11. Morozov V.P. Psychoacoustic aspects of speech perception. Mekhanizmy deyatel'nosti mozga cheloveka / pod red. N.P. Bekhterevoj. Moscow, Science Publ., 1988. Pp. 578-601. (In Russ.)

12. Nikonov A.V. Psychological problems of acoustic diagnostics of functional states of a human operator in special conditions. Psihologicheskie problemy deyatel'nosti v osobyh usloviyah. Moscow, Science Publ., 1985. Pp. 136-153. (In Russ.)

13. Nosenko E.L. Features of speech in a state of emotional tension. Dnepropetrovsk: Dnepropetrovsk University Publishing House, 1975. 132 p. (In Russ.)

14. Nushikyan E.A. Typology of intonation of emotional speech. Kiev - Odessa: Vishcha School Publishing, 1986. 157 p. (In Russ.)

15. Praktikum po obshchej, eksperimental'noj i prikladnoj psihologii: uchebnoe posobie / V.D. Balin, V.K. Gaida, V.K. Gorbachevsky and others, under the general ed. A.A. Krylova, S.A. Manicheva., St. Petersburg, Piter Publ.,2000. 560 p. (In Russ.)

16. Remeslo M.B. Changes in the psycholinguistic characteristics of patients with neuroses in the process of psychotherapy. Biopsihosocial'naya paradigma mediciny i ee vliyanie na razvitie psihonevrologicheskoj nauki i praktiki: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii molodyh uchenyh (Bekhterevskie chteniya). St. Petersburg, 2004. Pp. 189-193. (In Russ.)

17. Baddeley A. Human Memory. Theory and Practice (Revised). Psychology Press, 1997. 423 p.

18. Bavin E.L. Language acquisition in crosslinguistic perspective. Annu. Rev. Anthropol, 1995, no. 24, pp. 373-396.

19. Berman R.A, Slobin D.I. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994. 748 p.

20. Bowerman M. The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: cognitive versus linguistic determinants. Gumperz J.J, Levinson S.C. (eds.) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996. Pp. 145-176.

21. Bromley D.B. The idea of ageing: An historical and psychological analysis. Comprehensive Gerontology Series, 1988, no. 2, pp. 30-41.

22. Evans V., Green M. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. 830 p.

23. Harris R., Taylor T.J. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought 1: The Western Tradition from Socrates to ...Saussure. Psychology Press, 1997. P. 178.

24. Hauser M.D., Chomsky N., Fitch W.T. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 2002, vol. 298, no. 5598, pp.1569-1579.

25. Humboldt On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species. Cambridge University Press, 1999. 342 p.

26. Hunt E., Agnoli F. The Whorfian hypothesis: a cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 1991, no. 98(3), pp. 377-389. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.377

27. Jackendoff R. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983. 283 p.

28. Langacker R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical Prerequisites.Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1987. 540 p.

29. Bowerman M., Levinson S.C. (eds.) Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press., 1997. 602 p.

30. Carroll J.B., Levinson Stephen C., Lee Penny (eds.) Language, thought, and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., 2012. 448 p.

31. Laslett P. A fresh map of life. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan Press, 1996. 328 p.

32. Levinson S.C. From outer to inner space: linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. Nuyts J., Pederson E. (eds.) The Relationship between Linguistic and Conceptual Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997. Pp. 13-45.

33. Lucy J.A. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992. 211 p.

34. Lucy J.A. Linguistic relativity. Annu. Rev. Anthropol, 1997, no. 26, pp. 291-312.

35. Bäckman Lars, Nyberg Lars (eds.) Memory, Aging and the Brain: A Festschrift in Honour of Lars-Göran Nilsson. Hove, England: Psychology Press, 2009. 356 p.

36. Gumperz J.J, Levinson S.C. (eds.) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996. 488 p.

37. Rubinstein R.L. The Qualitative Interview with Older Informants: Some Key questions. Rowles G.D., Schoenberg N.E. (eds.) Qualitative Gerontology: A Contemporary Perspective. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company Inc., 2002. Pp. 137-152. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49281016_Quality_of_Life_Indicators_The_objective-subjective_inter-relationship_that_exists_within_one's_place_of_residence_in_old_age (accessed: 05.03.2019).

38. Rumsey A. Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist, 1990, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 346-361.

39. Slater R. The Psychology of Growing Old: Looking Forward. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1995. 164 p.

40. Slobin D.I. Two ways to travel: verbs of motion in English and Spanish. Shibitani M., Thompson S.A. (eds.) Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning. Clarendon Press., 1996. Pp. 195-220.

41. Tomasello M. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003. P. 56.

42. Tversky B. Visualizing Thought. Cognitive Science, 2011, no. 3, pp. 499-535. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x

43. Wharf B.L. Linguistics as an exact science. Carroll J.B., Levinson Stephen C., Lee Penny (eds.) Language, thought, and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., 2012. Pp. 281-298.

44. Whorf B.L. The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. Carroll J.B., Levinson Stephen C., Lee Penny (eds.) Language, thought, and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012. Pp. 173-204.

45. Wierzbicka A. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992. 492 p.

46. Efremova G.I., Timoshenko G.V., Leonenko E.A., Bochkovskaya I.A., Sorokoumova S.N., Potekhina E.V. The Projective Study of The Impact of The Vertical Position of a Person on The Nosological Specificity of Psychosomatic Risk. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 2016, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 685-691. Available at: https://www.rjpbcs.com/pdf/2016_7(6)/[86].pdf (accessed 05.03.2019).


Review

Views: 964


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)