FAMILY STORIES IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF DISCOURSE

Introduction: the last decades are characterized by a rising tide of interest of Russian citizens for the history of their families. The main form of its existence are family stories - both about the present of the family and its subjects, and about their past. These stories become natural part of our communicative space, no matter which type of activity and what social roles we are involved in. Materials and methods: the study was conducted on the material of texts - both oral and written, - containing information about addresser’s family. The main methods included the method of communicative behavior observation, the method of studying the forms and types of representation of family stories in different types of conversation, the method of analyzing and the method of generalization. Results: the purpose of this article was to analyze various types of discourse in order to identify the presence/absence of family stories in each of them, and to determine the role of such stories in various spheres of our life. Having considered interpersonal and several types of institutional discourse (scientific, popular scientific, political, medical, pedagogical and advertising), we examined how each of them presents family stories, for what purpose subjects use this kind of stories in each of the analyzed types of discourse and which aspects of family history are most relevant in each case. As a result of the study, it was determined that family stories play a significant role in our communication in each of the analyzed types of discourse, but in each of them they are used with a specific purpose. Discussion and conclusion: if we consider everything we know about our family as a family history (that consists of many separate, private family stories), then we can conclude that it flows into all spheres of our life. Our family history is penetrated by different types of discourse in which we participate, and, being included in our communication, is preserved in it.

1. Agafonov B.V., ZHuchenko L.A., Kalinenkova S.G., Kotov S.V., Neretin V.YA., Sidorova O.P., Kuz'micheva N.A., Selivanova E.A., SHestopalova E.A. Genetics in the practice of a family doctor. Al'manah klinicheskoj mediciny, 2004, no. 7, pp. 179-187. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9464905 (accessed: 21.12.2018). (in Russ.)

2. Alefirenko N.F., Golovaneva M.A., Ozerova E.G., Chumak-Zhun' I.I. Text and discourse: a textbook for undergraduates. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., Nauka Publ., 2012. 232 p. (in Russ.)

3. Bezrukova L.N. "And all as a dream passed your age" ... The diary of the wife of the commander of the Red Army for 1938-1941. Prostranstvo i vremya, 2017, no. 1(27), pp. 136-152. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29065442 (accessed 21.10.2018). (in Russ.)

4. Brimkulov N.N., Sydykova S.ZH., Zhajloobaeva A.T., Kubanychbek K.M., Shapovalova A., Botbaeva EH., Nurdinov B., Oshbaeva A., Kozhokulova N., Osmonkanova N., Zapar K.Z. Family doctors - leaders on the path to better health. Vestnik KGMA im. I.K. Ahunbaeva, 2018, no. 1, pp. 31-36. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35617693 (accessed 21.12.2018). (in Russ.)

5. Busyreva E.V. Ethnic identity of representatives of families with Finnish ancestry (Murmansk region). Ezhegodnik finno-ugorskih issledovanij, 2017, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 78-89. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30682497 (accessed 21.12.2018). (in Russ.)

6. Vargina S.A., Priz E.V., Rudenko A.YU. Family doctor - a stranger in the city? Sociologiya goroda, 2011, no. 3, pp. 15-21. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19122611 (accessed 21.12.2018). (in Russ.)

7. Vasil'eva E.V., Strel'nikova A.V. Biographical memory of urban families: the experience of analyzing photo albums. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Filosofiya, Sociologiya, Iskusstvovedenie, 2012, no. 2 (82), pp. 288-304. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17565206 (accessed 25.11.2018). (in Russ.)

8. Gorodilina M.V. Dialogue with the history of his family: foreign research experience. Pedagogika i psihologiya obrazovaniya, 2017, no. 2, pp. 110-119. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29762056 (accessed 15.11.2018). (in Russ.)

9. Gramatchikova N.B. Metamorphosis of family history: from the Sigitovs to Elston-Biron. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya, 2017, no. 3, pp. 192-220. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30071061 (accessed 15.10.2018). DOI: 10.17223 / 2312461X / 17/11. (in Russ.)

10. Domaneckaya L.V. Psychology of family and family education. Uch. allowance. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University. V.P. Astafieva. 2013, 212 p. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21355593 (accessed 29.11.2018). (in Russ.)

11. Egorova L.A. On the definition of the concept of "popular science discourse". Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Russkij i inostrannyj yazyki i metodika ih prepodavaniya», 2009, no. 1, pp. 42-46. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11731868 (accessed 25.11.2018). (in Russ.)

12. Ivanova G.V., Polyatykina T.S., Sevast'yanova G.I. Study of the influence of family relations on the effectiveness of prevention and treatment of arterial hypertension (in the practice of a family doctor). Vestnik Ivanovskoj medicinskoj akademii, 2007, vol. 12, no. 3-4, pp. 34-35. . Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12895817 (accessed 19.12.2018). (in Russ.)

13. Igolkin K.S., Domrachev S.S. Citizens' awareness of their family history and its role in the formation of socio-historical memory. Socium i vlast', 2016, no. 5(61), pp. 43-48. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27412198 (accessed 19.10.2018). (in Russ.)

14. Karasik V.I. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 477 p. (in Russ.)

15. Krasina M.N. Discourse, discourse analysis methods of their use in interdisciplinary projects. Vestnik TvGU. Seriya «Filologiya», 2018, no. 2, pp. 159-165. (in Russ.)

16. Krasnoborov M.A. Mechanisms of interaction of family and national historical memory in the process of formation of local identity. Vestnik Permskogo nacional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Social'no-ehkonomicheskie nauki, 2017, no. 3, pp. 123-131. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30107586 (accessed: 24.10.2018). DOI: 10.15593 / 2224-9354 / 2017.3.10 (in Russ.)

17. Krih A.A. Skuratov: family history in a historical retrospective (XVIII-XX century). Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoricheskie nauki», 2017, no. 1(13), pp. 85-91. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/skuratovy-semeynaya-istoriya-v-istoricheskoy-retrospektive-xvii-xx-veka (accessed: 15.10.2018) (in Russ.)

18. Kuznecova O.YU. Introduction to family medicine. Rossijskij semejnyj vrach, 2007, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 8-19. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11741794 (accessed: 15.12.2018). (in Russ.)

19. Kurin A. Family values. Why are the Nidan commercials prompting voting. Industriya reklamy, 2007, no. 15-16. Available at: http://adindustry.ru/doc/798 (accessed: 12.12.2018). (in Russ.)

20. Lobastova N.V. Psychology of family conflict. Prioritetnye nauchnye napravleniya: o teorii k praktike: sbornik materialov XXXVIII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Novosibirsk, 2017, pp. 94-98. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29174651 (accessed: 24.10.2018). (in Russ.)

21. Makusheva ZH.N. The study of the structure of the text of the article of the scientific medical discourse. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2018, no. 7 (196), pp. 15-18. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36351328 (accessed: 29.12.2018). (in Russ.)

22. Nikul'shina N.L. Written scientific discourse as an object of modeling for educational purposes. Vestnik TGU, 2008, vol. 3 (59), pp. 245-250. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=10333149 (accessed: 29.10.2018). (in Russ.)

23. Ovshieva N.L. On the issue of differences in the understanding of the term "discourse". Vestnik OGU, 2004, no. 11, pp. 165-169. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11660470 (accessed: 19.10.2018). (in Russ.)

24. Prohorov YU.E. Actuality. Text. Discourse: study guide. 3rd ed. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., Nauka Publ., 2009. 224 p. (in Russ.)

25. Romanov A.A. Political discourse in the system of social and institutional practice. Mir lingvistiki i kommunikacii: ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal, 2007, no. 9, pp. 8-13. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11565394 (accessed: 13.11.2018). (in Russ.)

26. Saksel'cev G.I. The evolution of the peasant family in Russian history at the end of the XVII-XX centuries. (on the example of the genus Sakseltsevs). The dissertation of the candidate of historical sciences. 07.00.02. Tomsk, 2013. 310 p. (in Russ.)

27. Saporovskaya M.V., Zolotova M.A. Transgeneration in the family in line with the narrative approach: family stories of survival / coping. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Social'naya rabota. Yuvenologiya. Sociokinetika, 2013, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 106-110. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19109418 (accessed: 23.11.2018). (in Russ.)

28. Sirkiya N.P. Political discourse vs political Internet discourse: similarities and differences (cognitive aspect). Istoricheskaya i social'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl', 2018, vol. 10, no. 2-2, pp. 164-170. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35085351 (accessed: 13.11.2018). DOI: 10.17748 / 2075-9908-2018-10-2 / 2-164-170 (in Russ.)

29. Suvorova S.L. Phenomenology of the study of the concepts of "discourse" and "pedagogical discourse". Vestnik YUzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Obrazovanie. Pedagogicheskie nauki, 2012, no. 4(263). P. 84-87. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17715202 (accessed: 13.11.2018). (in Russ.)

30. Timoshina N.A. The value of archival documents of personal origin in the study of the history of culture of the Kirov-Apatity region. Trudy Kol'skogo nauchnogo centra RAN, 2018, vol. 9, no. 2-13, pp. 10-15. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34957466 (accessed: 12.29.2018). DOI: 10.25702 / KSC.2307-5252.2018.9.2.10-15. (in Russ.)

31. Tolpygina O.A. Discourse and discourse analysis in political science. Politicheskaya nauka, 2002, no. 3, pp. 76-89. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=1232778 (accessed: 13.12.2018). (in Russ.)

32. Thao Vu T.F. Family Values in Promotional Texts in the National-Cultural Aspect. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2012, no. 4, pp. 206-210. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/semeynye-tsennosti-v-reklamnyh-tekstah-v-natsionalno-kulturnom-aspekte (accessed: 17.11.2018). (in Russ.)

33. Tyurina S.YU. On the concepts of advertising discourse and advertising text. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo ehnergeticheskogo universiteta im. V.I. Lenina, 2009, no. 1, pp. 75-77. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12849203 (accessed: 17.11.2018). (in Russ.)

34. Shevcova N.N. Features of the approach to the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in the practice of the family doctor. Al'manah klinicheskoj mediciny, 2004, no. 7, pp. 148-159. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9464902 (accessed: 15.12.2018). (in Russ.)

35. Dellios A. Memory and Family in Australian Refugee Histories. Immigrants & Minorities, 2018, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 79-86. DOI: 10.1080/02619288.2018.1471860

36. Evans P.R. A portrait of the discipline of general practice/family medicine. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2004, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 303-315. DOI: 10.1080/13561820410001731340

37. Frude N., Killick S. Family storytelling and the attachment relationship. Psychodynamic Practice, 2011, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 441-455. DOI: 10.1080/14753634.2011.609025

38. Gagalis-Hoffman K., Zabriskie R. B., Freeman P. A. A Retrospective Consideration of Recreational Family Storytelling Among Parents and Their Adult Children. Marriage & Family Review, 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 392-412. DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2015.1100696

39. Grotevant H. D. Orchestrating Differences. Marriage & Family Review, 2002, vol. 31, no. 3-4, pp. 113-127. DOI: 10.1300/J002v31n03_07

40. Hagemeister D.T., Pal A., Naidoo N., Kristen U., Mokgosana N., Joubert G. Undergraduate medical students’ interest in specialising in Family Medicine at the University of the Free State, 2014. South Africa Family Practice, 2017, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 166-171. DOI: 10.1080/20786190.2017.1317977

41. Hogg J., Hart A., Collins Z. V. Service family support – a small-scale project of educational psychologists working with parents. Educational Psychology in Practice, 2014, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 167-180. DOI: 10.1080/02667363.2014.899488

42. Kaslow F., Schwartz L.L. To whom does the fetus or baby belong? Surrogate motherhood and family psychology/therapy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 1990, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 385-392. DOI: 10.1080/01926189008250987

43. Kaslow N.J., Kaslow S., Kaslow H.I. Family Togetherness. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 2004, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 235-250. DOI: 10.1300/J085v15n01_17

44. Kellas J.K. Family Ties: Communicating Identity Through Jointly Told Family Stories. Communication Monographs, 2005, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 365-389. DOI: 10.1080/03637750500322453.

45. Krok D. Examining the role of religion in a family setting: religious attitudes and quality of life among parents and their adolescent children. Journal of Family Studies, 2018, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 203-218. DOI: 10.1080/13229400.2016.1176589

46. L'abate L. Family psychology and family therapy: Comparisons and contrasts. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 1992, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3-12 DOI: 10.1080/01926189208250871

47. L’Abate L. Highlights From 60 Years of Practice, Research, and Teaching in Family Therapy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 2015, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 180-196. DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2014.1002367

48. León E., Palacios J., Román M., Moreno C., Peñarrubia M.G. Parental stress, family functioning and children’s psychological adjustment in adoptive families: A comparative and longitudinal study. Family Science, 2015, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 50-57. DOI: 10.1080/19424620.2015.1080991

49. Michels N., Maagaard R., Buchanan J., Scherpbier N. Educational training requirements for general practice/family medicine specialty training: recommendations for trainees, trainers and training institutions. Education for primary care, 2018, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 322-326. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2018.1517391

50. Prins E. Digital storytelling in adult education and family literacy: a case study from rural Ireland. Learning, Media and Technology, 2017, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 308-323. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2016.1154075

51. Shapiro A. The Theme of the Family in Contemporary Society and Positive Family Psychology. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 2004, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 19-38. DOI: 10.1300/J085v15n01_03

52. Sperry L., L'Abate L. The Acknowledged Father of Family Psychology. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 2016, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 169-171. DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2016.1203193

53. Thomson P.A., Schrodt P. Perceptions of Joint Family Storytelling as Mediators of Family Communication Patterns and Family Strengths. Communication Quarterly, 2015, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 405-426. DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2015.1058286.

54. Thorson A.R., Rittenour C.E., Kellas J.K., Trees A.R. Quality Interactions and Family Storytelling. Communication Reports, 2013, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 88-100. DOI: 10.1080/08934215.2013.797482