DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EDUCATIONAL EVENT IN THE TRAINING OF FUTURE MANAGERS

Introduction: the existing contradiction between the reproduction of traditional methods of vocational training and the productivity of professional activity determines the relevance of the search and approbation of new forms of organization of the educational process. As such a form, an educational event can be used to effectively engage students in various types of interaction, develop professional motivation, organize independent and joint activities, obtain a meaningful product, and provide a reflexive awareness of the experience gained. The study of the possibilities of implementing an educational event in the professional preparation of future managers, taking into account the specifics of professional management, has a high theoretical and practical significance. Materials and methods: experimental work on studying the effectiveness of the implementation of an educational event was carried out in three stages. At the first, a theoretical substantiation of the possibilities of applying the event-based approach in vocational education was carried out, at the second, a methodology for designing an educational event was developed, and at the third, an assessment was made of the effectiveness of an educational event for students — future managers. In the process of research, general theoretical methods, interrogation, observation and generalization of pedagogical experience, static methods were used. Results: as a result of the work carried out, the features of the application of the event approach in vocational education were formulated, the requirements for the educational event were specified. The revealed features of this form of the educational process are reflected in the method developed by the authors for the design of an educational event, including a description of the motivational, event and reflective stages. Further, experimental work was carried out to implement the educational event within the discipline, to collect and process the results. As a result, indicators of current and final certification (by point-rating system) were evaluated, and a survey of the participants of the educational event regarding the advantages and disadvantages of this form of the educational process was conducted. Discussion and Conclusions: conclusions were drawn on the significant didactic potential of the implementation of the educational process on the discipline in the form of an educational event, provided that the methodical study of the content of the activities of the students and the high level of development of skills of independent work with them.

1. Valeev R.G. Cognitive independence of students as a prerequisite and result of educational events. Sobytijnost' v obrazovanii i pedagogicheskoj deyatel'nosti / pod red. N.B. Krylovoj i M.YU. Zhilinoj, 2010, no. 1 (43), pp. 63-69. (in Russ.)

2. Volkova N.V. Educational eventiness: signs and characteristics. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal'nogo universiteta im. M.K. Ammosova, 2010, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 78-82. (in Russ.)

3. Volkova N.V. Technology of designing educational events. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2017, vol. 19, no.4, pp. 184-200. DOI: 10.17853 / 1994-5639-2017-4-184-200(in Russ.)

4. Zhilina M.YU. Educational event: reading options. Organizaciya t'yutorskogo soprovozhdeniya v obrazovatel'nyh uchrezhdeniyah: soderzhanie, normirovanie i standartizaciya deyatel'nosti t'yutora: materialy Vserossijskogo nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara «Standarty t'yutorskoj deyatel'nosti: teoriya i praktika» (Moskva, 18-19 maya 2009 g.) / nauch. red. T.M. Kovaleva; otv. red. A.A. Terov, M.YU. Zhilina. M.: APKiPPRO, 2009, pp. 152-158. (in Russ.)

5. Innovative educational model of adolescent and high school “School of effective maturity”: a tutorial. Ed. N.V. Muha, L.N. Antropyanskoj, E.V. Sharaburovoj. Tomsk, 2007. (in Russ.)

6. Krylova N.B. Conditions of manifestation of eventfulness of education. Sobytijnost' v obrazovanii i pedagogicheskoj deyatel'nosti / pod red. N.B. Krylovoj i M.YU. Zhilinoj; nauchnyj redaktor serii N.B. Krylova, 2010, no. 1 (43), pp. 136-145. (in Russ.)

7. Melik-Gajkazyan I.V. “Event-in-reality” and “event-in-reality”. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009, no. 3(7), pp. 54-76. (in Russ.)

8. Prohorova M.P., Semchenko A.A. Innovative activity of a university teacher as a factor in the quality of pedagogical education. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2016, no. 1. (in Russ.)

9. Prohorova M.P., Vaganova O.I., Rumyanceva N.A. Methods of designing an educational event in high school. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya: sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Ser. Pedagogika i psihologiya. Yflta: RIO GPA, 2018, vol. 59, part 4, pp. 153-157. (in Russ.)

10. Prohorova M.P., Golubeva O.V., Madadanova K.H. Didactic possibilities of a learning event as a form of organization of educational activities. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya: sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Ser. Pedagogika i psihologiya. Yflta: RIO GPA, 2018, vol. 58, part 4, pp.230-233. (in Russ.)

11. Slobodchikov V.I. Co-being educational community - the source of development and the subject of education. Sobytijnost' v obrazovanii i pedagogicheskoj deyatel'nosti / pod red. N.B. Krylovoj i M.YU. Zhilinoj; nauchnyj redaktor serii N.B. Krylova, 2010, no.1 (43), pp. 5-14. (in Russ.)

12. Eventfulness in educational and pedagogical activity. Ed. N.B. Krylova, M.YU. Zhilina. 2010, no. 1 (43). 157 p. (in Russ.)

13. Solov'ev G.E. Event approach in the education of schoolchildren. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta, 2009, no. 2, pp. 103-111. (in Russ.)

14. Frolova S.V., Ilaltdinova E.YU. The concept of an educational event in the practice-oriented paradigm of higher education. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2017, no. 1. (in Russ.)

15. Ehl'konin B.D. Sample as a construct of the educational system. Pedagogika razvitiya: klyuchevye kompetentnosti i ih stanovlenie: materialy 9-oj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Krasnoyarsk, 2003, pp. 5-22. (in Russ.)

16. Armstrong Lloyd. Barriers to Innovation and Change in Higher Education. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d513/141cb6af397d22a68d99fa9264875f888312.pdf (accessed: 07.08.2017).

17. Barber M., Donneliy K. and Rizvi S. An avalanche is coming. Higher education and the revolution ahead. Institute for Public Policy Research.Washington, Columbia region, 2013.

18. Bronkhorst L., Meijer P., Koster B., Vermunt J. Fostering meaning-oriented learning anddeliberate practice in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016, vol. 27, pp. 1120-1130.

19. Budsankom P., Sawangboon T., Damrongpanit S., Chuensirimongkol J. Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Educational Research and Reviews, 2016, vol. 10(19), pp. 2639-2652.

20. Bulganina S.B., Golubeva O.B., Lebedeva T.E., Prokhorova M.P. Managing students’ independent work at university. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 2017, vol. 7, no. 10.

21. Ennis R.H. The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. Available at: https://education.illinois.edu/docs/default-source/faculty-documents/robert-ennis/thenatureofcriticalthinking_51711_000.pdf?sfvrsn=7bb51288_2 (accessed: 27.12.2018).

22. Ilyashenko L.K., Prokhorova M.P., Vaganova O.I., Smirnova Z.V., Aleshugina E.A. (2018) Managerial preparation of engineers with eyes of students. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), 2018, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1080-1087.

23. Jang H., Reeve J., Deci E.L. Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It Is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2010, vol. 102(3), pp. 588-600.

24. Loh K.Y.E., Tam S.W.L. The role of emotionality in teacher change: the case of Chinese language teachers in Hong Kong. Teacher Development, 2017, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 462-479. DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2016.1266381

25. Roblyer M.D., Knezek G.A. New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2003, vol. 36(1), pp. 60-71.

26. Saavedra A., Opfer V. Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 2012, vol. 94(2), pp. 8-13.

27. Schuh K. Knowledge Construction in the Learner-Centered. Classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, vol. 95(2), pp. 426-442.

28. Sobon A. ICT Tools Support of Erasmus+: Lessons Learned of Polish Military Universities. Ishmuhametov I., Misnevs B. (eds) International Scientific and Educational Conference «Actual Problems of Education» (25-26 February, 2016), Riga, 2016. Available at: http://www.tsi.lv/sites/default/files/editor/science/Conferences/MIP2016/mip_2016_2v_1.pdf (accessed: 27.12.2018).

29. Stepien W.J., Gallagher S.A., & Workman D. Problem-based learning for traditional and interdisciplinary classrooms. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1993, vol. 16, pp. 338-357.

30. Teacher Policy Development Guide. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002352/235272e.pdf (accessed: 27.12.2018).

31. Thomas J.W. A review of research on project-based learning. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.330.1249&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed: 27.12.2018).