EXPERIENCE OF FORMATION OF COMMUNICATIVE UNIVERSAL EDUCATIONAL ACTIONS YOUNGER SCHOOLCHILDREN

Introduction: The article presents the problem of formation of universal educational actions of younger schoolchildren, affecting their development, education and socialization. The theoretical analysis of the works that interpret the concepts of "universal educational actions", "communicative universal educational actions" is given. The results of the study aimed at identifying the level of formation of communicative universal educational actions of younger schoolchildren and determining the positions of the subjects in communication are considered. Possible variants of individual educational routes for children of this category are described.

Materials and methods: The study was carried out on the basis of theoretical methods (analysis of psychological, pedagogical and methodical literature, including clarification of the essence of the concepts of "individual educational route", "universal educational actions", selection of features of the formation of universal educational actions of Junior schoolchildren, etc.), empirical methods (psychological and  pedagogical experiment aimed at studying the level of formation of communicative universal educational actions of Junior schoolchildren and the development of options for individual educational routes), data processing methods (quantitative and qualitative analysis).

Results: The study enabled us to trace the positive dynamics of growth of the level of formation of communicative universal educational actions of Junior schoolchildren before and after the experimental work with the use of designed individual educational routes.

Discussion and conclusions: The obtained data confirm that the designed individual educational routes for younger schoolchildren were effective, as a positive dynamics in changing the level of formation of communicative universal educational actions of the subjects was noted as well as, the ability to conduct a dialogue, take into account the position of the interlocutor, to carry out joint actions with the peer. The materials of the article can be useful for specialists and teachers of educational organizations interested in the formation of communicative universal educational activities of younger schoolchildren.

designing, individual educational route, universal educational actions, communicative universal educational actions, younger schoolchildren

1. Aref'eva O.M. Features of formation of communicative universal educational abilities of younger schoolboys. Nachal'naya shkola; 2012; no. 2; pp. 74-78. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17542613 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

2. Asmolov A.G. How to design universal educational activities in primary school: from action to thought: a manual for a teacher / ed. A.G. Asmolova; G.V. Burmensky; I.A. Volodarskaya; OA Karabanova; S.V. Molchanov. Moscow: Prosveshchenie; 2008. 151 p. Available at: http://docplayer.ru/42293-Pod-redakciey-a-g-asmolova.html (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

3. Balashova A.I.; Ermolova N.A.; Potylicyna A.F. To the question of the development of universal educational activities. Municipal'noe obrazovanie: innovacii i ehksperiment; 2009; no. 5; pp. 69-73. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16382365 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

4. Bolotov V.A.; Isaev E.I.; Slobodchikov V.I.; SHajdenko N.A. Designing of professional pedagogical education. Pedagogika; 1997; no. 4; pp. 66-72. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20385283 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

5. Butorina O.V. Formation of universal educational activities in children with disabilities. Nachal'naya shkola; 2016; no. 7; pp. 74-76. Available at: https://n-shkola.ru/archive/viewarticle/2812 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

6. Vazhnova O.G. Designing the pedagogical activity of the school complex: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of pedagogical sciences. Yaroslavl; 1999. 21 p. Available at: https://search.rsl.ru/en/record/01000241613 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

7. Vinogradova N.F. Formation of universal educational activities among junior schoolchildren. Nachal'noe obrazovanie; 2016; vol. 4; no. 2; pp. 3-5. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26499047 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

8. Vinokurova N.V. Formation of communicative universal educational activities among younger schoolchildren in the process of studying spelling. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie; 2017; no. 1(29); pp. 61-65. Available at: https://www.mordgpi.ru/upload/iblock/caa/1_29_-_yanvar_mart_.pdf (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

9. Gnevehk O.V. To the logic of the formation of universal educational activities in the learning process. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki; 2016; no. 6; pp. 79-85. Available at: http://www.nauteh-journal.ru/index.php/--gn16-06/2604-a (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

10. Gordienko N.V. Formation of communicative universal educational activities among younger students. Pedagogicheskij zhurnal; 2017; vol. 7; no. 3A; pp. 200-210. Available at: http://www.publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-pedagogy-2017-3/21-gordienko.pdf (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

11. Grishanova I.A. Didactic concept of formation of communicative success of younger schoolchildren: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the doctor of pedagogical sciences. Izhevsk; 2010. 39с. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19332015 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

12. Egorova K.V. The multicultural approach as a general scientific basis for the formation of communicative universal educational activities for junior schoolchildren. Prioritetnye nauchnye napravleniya: ot teorii k praktike; 2016; no. 22; pp. 47-52. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25430618 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

13. ZHukovina YU.V. Formation of communicative universal educational activities among younger students. Novaya nauka: Opyt; tradicii; innovacii; 2016; no. 1-2 (123); pp. 66-68. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27705708 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

14. Inevatkina S.E.; Levanova E.S. Designing an individual educational route for preschool children with a pronounced mental retardation. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii; 2016; no. 12-3; pp. 609-612. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19332015 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

15. Karabanova O.A. What are universal learning activities and why are they needed? Municipal'noe obrazovanie: innovacii i ehksperiment; 2010; no. 2; pp. 11-12. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chto-takoe-universalnye-uchebnye-deystviya-i-zachem-oni-nuzhny (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

16. Kuznecova N.V. Opportunities for the formation of universal educational activities in the lessons of literary reading in the process of using the group form of work. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie; 2017; no. 1(29); pp. 65-69. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28856771 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

17. Lomakina D.A.; Markushevskaya E.A. Formation of communicative universal educational actions of younger schoolchildren. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya v Rossii; 2016; no. 38; pp. 34-37. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25448268 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

18. Mamonova E.B.; Suvorova O.V.; Personova A.A. Group and individual routes for the development of universal educational activities (UUD) of junior schoolchildren. Nauka i Mir; 2016; vol. 2; no. 4(32); pp. 86-88. Available at: http://scienceph.ru/d/413259/d/science_and_world_no_4_(32);_april;_vol._ii.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2018).

19. Markushevskaya E.A.; Nikandrova A.V. The Game as a Means for the Formation of Communicative Universal Educational Actions of Junior Schoolchildren. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya v Rossii; 2016; no. 38; pp. 7-9. Available at: https://vivliophica.com/articles/ education/379773 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

20. Morozova E.E.; Evdokimova E.G.; Dvorzheckaya O.YU. Development of universal educational action of younger schoolchildren in ecological design. Nauchnoe obozrenie: gumanitarnye issledovaniya; 2016; no. 4; pp. 101-106. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26145966 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

21. Morozova I.A. Innovative ways of formation of universal educational actions. Simvol nauki; 2016; no. 2-1(14); pp. 155-156. Available at: https://os-russia.com/SBORNIKI/SN-16-2-1.pdf (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

22. Mostova O.N. Development of communicative skills of junior schoolchildren on the basis of individual-typological features: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of pedagogical sciences. St. Petersburg; 2007. 24 p. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15875891 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

23. Neyasova I.A. Formation of personal universal educational activities among younger schoolchildren in the educational process. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie; 2017; no. 1(29); pp. 47-50. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28856765 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

24. Nosova N.V.; Caturyan M.O. Psihologo-pedagogical model of formation of universal educational actions at younger schoolboys in extracurricular activity. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya; 2016; no. 51; pp. 374-380. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25838978 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

25. Petuhova O.A. Formation of universal educational actions among younger schoolchildren as a social and pedagogical problem. Koncept; 2016; vol. 11; pp. 811-815. Available at: https://e-koncept.ru/2016/86175.htm (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

26. Polomoshnova S.A. The vector of training: from general educational skills to universal educational actions. Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. YAroslava Mudrogo; 2016; no. 2(93); pp. 91-94. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26084058 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

27. Sannikova N.I. Monitoring the formation of universal educational activities. Koncept; 2016; vol. 48; pp. 8-19. Available at: https://e-koncept.ru/2016/76604.htm (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

28. Sultanova G.M. Peculiarities of the formation of communicative universal educational activities in Russian language lessons in primary school. Obuchenie i vospitanie: metodiki i praktika; 2016; no. 27; pp. 72-77. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26184973 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

29. Federal state educational standard of primary general education. Available at: https://kpfu.ru/docs/F2009061155/FGOS.NOO_23_10_09_Minjust_3._1_.pdf (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

30. Cukerman G.A.; CHudinova E.V. Diagnosis of the ability to learn. Moscow; 2016. 64 p. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/book.nsf/65882296/ Diagnostics + skills + study (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

31. SHemelova O.YU. Psychological and pedagogical diagnostics as a means of controlling the formation of communicative universal educational activities in the junior school. Prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya; 2016; no. 1(8); pp. 213-215. Available at: https://interactive-plus.ru/ru/article/16932/discussion_platform (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

32. YAkovleva N.O. Designing as a pedagogical phenomenon. Pedagogika; 2001; no. 6; pp. 83-98. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21851841 (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

33. YAnkina L.A. Formation of logical universal educational actions of younger schoolchildren in the study of geometric concepts. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie; 2017; no. 1(29); pp. 78-81. Available at: https://www.mordgpi.ru/upload/iblock/caa/1_29_-_yanvar_mart_.pdf (accessed 20.02.2018) (in Russian).

34. Adair J. Effective Communication. American Journal of Educational Research; 2016; vol. 1; no. 9; pp. 406-412. Available at: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/EDUCATION/archive (accessed 20.06.2018).

35. Billing D. Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills. Higher Education; 2007; vol. 53; pp. 483-516. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-005-5628-5 (accessed 20.06.2018)

36. Dodge K.A.; Pettit G.S.; Bates J.E. Socialization Mediators of the Relation between Socioeconomic Status and Child Conduct Problems. Child Development; 1994; vol. 65(2); pp. 649-665. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8013245 (accessed 20.06.2018).

37. Dougherty L.R. Children's Emotionality and Social Status: A Meta-analytic Review. Social Development; 2006; vol. 15(3); pp. 394-417. Available at: http://www.ijese.net/makale/139 (accessed 20.06.2018).

38. Frederiksen J.R.; White B.Y. Conceptualizing and constructing linked models: Creating coherence in complex knowledge systems. The Role of Communication in Learning to Model. Mahwah; NJ: Erlbaum; 2002. Vol. 34. Рр. 69-96. Available at: https://education.uw.edu/people/faculty/frederik (accessed 20.06.2018).

39. Hasson G. Brilliant Communication Skills. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education; 2015; vol. 11; no. 11; pp. 4578-4586. Available at: http://www.ijese.net (accessed 20.06.2018).

40. Marilyn S.; Rochel G. The Development of Communication Skills: Modifications in the Speech of Young Children as a Function of Listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. American Journal of Educational Research; 2016; vol. 1; no. 9; pp. 406-412. Available at: https://www.scilit.net/article/ d4c7c1d1e183962088c88996cf966c00 (accessed 20.06.2018).

41. McKeough A. Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning. Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyian pragmatism. Educational Psychologist; 2013; vol. 29(1); pр. 23-35. Available at: https://play.google.com/store/books/details/Anne_McKeough_Teaching_for_Transfer?id=GVFcAgAAQBAJ (accessed 20.06.2018).

42. Meenakshi R.; Sharma S. Technical Communication: Principles and Practice. Second Edition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2017. Available at: https://ru.scribd.com/document/356280462/Raman-Meenakshi-Sharma-Sangeeta-Technical-Communication-Principles-and-Practice-Oxford-University-Press-2015 (accessed 20.06.2018).

43. Nielsen M.; Kapitany R.; Elkins R. The perpetuation of ritualistic actions as revealed by young children‘s transmission of normative behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior; 2015; vol. 36(3); pр. 191-198. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/18174953/The_perpetuation_of_ritualistic_actions_as_revealed_by_young_childrens_transmission_of_normative_behavior (accessed 20.06.2018).

44. Pintrich P.R.; De Groot E.V. Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology; 1990; vol. 82; pр. 33-40. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.315.6253&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 20.06.2018).

45. Salomon G.; Perkins D.N. Do technologies make us smarter? ... Lessons to be Learned From Research on Peace Education in the Context of Intractable Conflict. Theory to Practice; 2005; vol.44 (4); pр. 293-302 . Available at: http://studylib.net/doc/7505864/salomon--g (accessed 20.06.2018).

46. Schoonmaker S. Kids in Context: The Sociological Study of Children and Childhoods. Contemporary Sociology; 2006; vol. 35(6); pp. 579-580. Available at: http://www.ijese.net/makale/139 (accessed 20.06.2018).

47. Schraw G.; Nietfeld J.A Further Test of the General Monitoring Skill Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology; 1998; vol. 90; pр. 236-248. Available at: http://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1240465 (accessed 20.06.2018).

48. Wichmann C.; Coplan R.J.; Daniels T. The Social Cognitions of Socially Withdrawn Children. Social Development; 2004; vol. 13(3); pp. 377-392. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ687369 (accessed 20.06.2018).