CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The goals and values of human life, the search for the meaning of human existence contain the potential for a meaningful, progressive development of philosophical and anthropological ideas at any time in history. One of the tasks of philosophical anthropology is the formation of the image of man, the choice of ways to achieve the ideal, the methods of comprehension and resolution of universal problems. The increasing processes of differentiation in science led to the formation of different views on the nature of man, to the distinction between classical and non-classical philosophical anthropology. А comparative analysis of these trends is given in this article.

Materials and methods: The dialectical method is preferred in the question of research methodology, the hermeneutic and phenomenological approaches are used.

Results: The development of philosophical anthropology correlates with the challenges of modernity. By tracking the trends of human change, philosophical anthropology changes the approach to the consideration of its main subject of research. The whole array of disciplines that study man comes to new discoveries, new theories, and philosophical anthropology changes its view of the vision, challenging the principles of classical philosophical anthropology.

Classical philosophical anthropology elevates the biological nature of man to a pedestal, non-classical philosophical anthropology actualizes questions of language, culture, thinking, understanding, actualizes the hermeneutic and phenomenological approaches. The desire to understand a person in classical philosophical anthropology is based on the desire to fully reveal the biological mechanisms in a person. The perspective of treating a person in nonclassical philosophical anthropology is polyformen: man as a text, as a dreaming self, as an eternal transition. Non-classical philosophical anthropology, goes from the idea of identity to the idea of variability, from biological concepts to questions of culture, language, thinking.

Discussion and Conclusions: The global society carries a whole spectrum of changes. The fragmentation and pluralism of the era of human deconstruction transforms the thinking, imagination and needs of man. The person himself is transformed, in connection with which the development of philosophical anthropology in the modern era is actualized.

1. Alejnik R.M. The Problem of Man in the Philosophical Postmodern Literature. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007, no. 296, 69 p. (In Russian)

2. Bejtson G. Jekologija razuma. Izbrannye stat'i po antropologii, psihiatrii i jepistemologii. 1969-1972 [Ecology of Reason. Selected articles on anthropology, psychiatry and epistemology]. Available at: http://www.koob.ru/bateson_gregory/ (accessed 12.04.2017) (in Russian).

3. Bodrijjar Zh. Simuljakry i simuljacija [Simulacra and simulation]. Available at: http://lit.lib.ru/k/kachalow_a/simulacres_et_simulation.shtml (accessed 04.03.2018) (in Russian).

4. Borodaj Ju.M. From fantasy to reality (the origin of morality). Moscow, Instituta filosofii RAN Publ. 1994. 297 p. (In Russian)

5. Delez Zh. Difference and repetition. St. Petersburg, TOO TK «Petropolis». 1998. 204 p. (In Russian)

6. Derrida Zh. Jesse ob imeni [Essay about the name]. Available at: http://royallib.com/book/derrida_gak/esse_ob_imeni.html (accessed 07.06.2017) (in Russian).

7. Zhukova O.I. The split of the personality's self in the philosophy of postmodern. Vestnik KemGU, 2008, no. 1, pp. 87-95 (in Russian).

8. Il'enkov Je.V. Chto znachit lichnost'? [What does the personality mean?]. Available at: http://phil.ulstu.ru/files/studentam/person.p (accessed 06.06.2017) (in Russian).

9. Il'enkov Je.V. Philosophy and culture. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1991. 464 p. (in Russian).

10. Il'in I.P. Postrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [Posturalism. Deconstructivism. Postmodernism]. Available at: http:// www.nietzsche.ru/influence/philosophie/iliin (accessed 07.07.2017) (in Russian).

11. Liotar Zh.-F. Sostojanie postmoderna [The state of postmodernity]. Available at: http://teatr-lib.ru/Library/Bahtin/esthetic/ (accessed 04.05.2017) (in Russian).

12. Methodology of science and anthropology. Ed. O.I. Genisaretskij, A.P. Ogurcov. M.: IF RAN Publ., 2012. 288 p. (in Russian).

13. Petrova G.I. The modern constructivist answer in solving the classical pedagogical-anthropological problem of "taking care of oneself". Vestnik TGPU, 2014, no. 12, pp. 131-134 (in Russian).

14. Philosophical anthropology. Comp. F.I. Girenok, N.N. Rostova. M.: MGU im. Lomonosova Publ., 2014. Available at: http://philos.msu.ru/kaf/antrop/guides/ (accessed 03.06.2017) (in Russian).

15. Fuko M. Germenevtika subekta [Hermeneutics of the subject]. Available at: http:e-libra.ru/read/353594-germenevtika-subekta.html (accessed 07.06.2017) (in Russian).

16. Sheler M. Chelovek i istorija [Man and history]. Available at: http://www.max-scheler.spb.ru/content/view/17/37/ (accessed 04.02.2017) (in Russian).

17. Jepshtejn M.A. Space symbol: On the future of the humanities. Moscow: New Literary Review Publ., 2004. 864 p. (In Russian)

18. Bateson G., Donaldson R. E. A Sacred Unity: Further Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Harper Collins, 1991. 346 p.

19. Bateson G. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. Hampton Press, 1979. 220 p.

20. Paul Strathern. Derrida in 90 minutes. Chicago: Ivan R.Dee, 2000. Available at: http://psylib.org.ua/books/stret01/txt21.htm#1 (accessed 16.11.2017).

21. Brent A. Philosophical Foundations for the Curriculum. L.-Boston, 1978.

22. De Beistegui Miguel. The Deleuzian reversal of Platonism. Cambridge.: University Press, 2012. P. 55-81.

23. Deleuze G. Empirisme et subjectivité. P.: PUF, 1953.

24. Deleuze G. Critique et clinique. Available at: https://ec56229aec51f1baff1d-185c3068e22352c56024573e929788ff.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/attachments/original/0/6/3/002742063.pdf (accessed 16.11.2017)

25. Deleuze G. Logique du sens. Available at: http://www.uboeschenstein.ch/texte/Deleuze-logiquedusens.pdf (accessed 16.11.2017).

26. Deleuze G. Le Pli: Leibniz et le Baroque. Available at: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/philosoph/deleuze%3Dle_pli%3Dleibniz_et_le_baroque.pdf (accessed 16.11.2017).

27. Deleuze G. Différence et répétition. Available at: https://www.puf.com/content/Diff%C3%A9rence_et_r%C3%A9p%C3%A9tition (accessed 16.11.2017).

28. Patton Paul. Deleuze’s political philosophy. Cambridge.: University Press, 2012. Р. 198-219.

29. Somers-Hall Henry. Introduction. Cambridge.: University Press, 2012. Р. 1-12.

30. Somers-Hall Henry. Deleuze’s philosophical heritage: unity, difference, and onto-theology. Cambridge.: University Press, 2012. Р. 337-356.

31. Williams, James. Difference and Repetition. Cambridge.: University Press, 2012. Р. 33-54.

32. Willatt, Edward; Lee, Matt. Editorial Introduction: 'On the Very Idea of Conditions of Thought'. N.Y.: Continuum, 2009. Р. 1-10.