Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

THE DOCTRINE OF SAINT BASIL THE GREAT'S ABOUT DISTINCTION BETWEEN ESSENCE AND ENERGY

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2017-3-18

Abstract

The doctrine Saint Basil the Great's about distinction between God's essence and God's energy which has arisen in the course of long-term fight of Saint Basil against the heresy of Arius is researched in this article. The basic principle of the heresy of Arius is that God the Son is not born, but only created by God the Father. God the Son is the original creation, and, therefore, there is not God. The doctrine Saint Basil the Great's arises, strictly speaking, as reaction to heresy of Evnomy who was the most radical follower of Arius. According to Evnomy, the Son isn't similar in anything to the Father and, therefore, the essence of the Son isn't similar to essence of God Father. God is entirely known and there is absolutely simple. To connect absolute not cognoscibility of God to cognoscibility of God, complexity and plurality of God to absolute simplicity of God, Saint Basil allocates two conditions of existence of God, namely: existence "in essence" and existence "out of essence". Saint Basil separates God's essence from God's numerous actions and properties as which he understands energy. God's essence is entirely not learned, but God is learned on the numerous actions and energy.  God's essence is absolutely simple, but God is difficult and diverse on the numerous actions.

About the Author

D. V. Vorobiov
Minin Nizhny Novgorod Statе Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Vorobyov Dmitriy Valerevich - Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences



References

1. Anthropology of Eastern Christian theological thought. St. Petersburg, Nikea Publ., 2009, t. 1, 672 c. (In Russian)

2. Bolotov V.V. Lectures on the history of the ancient Church. Minsk, Kharvest, 2008, t. 3, t. 4. 767 p. (In Russian)

3. Brilliantov A.I. Lectures on the history of the ancient Church. St. Petersburg, "Publishing house of Oleg Abyshko", 2013. 464 p. (In Russian)

4. Vasilij Velikij. Against Eunomius. Tvorenija: v 3-h tomah [Creations: in 3 volumes]. Moscow, Siberian Blagozvonitsa, 2008, t. 1, 1136 p. (In Russian)

5. Vasilij Velikij. To Amphilochius of Iconium. Tvorenija: v 3-h tomah [Creations: in 3 volumes]. Moscow, Siberian Blagozvonnitsa, 2012, t. 2, 1232 p. (In Russian)

6. Grigorij Nisskij. The refutation of Eunomius. Dogmaticheskie sochinenija [Dogmatic writings]. Krasnodar, The text, 2006, t. 2. 448 p. (In Russian)

7. Ioann Damaskin. Exact statement of the Orthodox faith. Istochnik znanija [Source of knowledge.]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2006. 357 p. (In Russian)

8. Kiprian Kern. Anthropology of St. Gregory Palamas. Kiev: Society of Lovers of Orthodox Literature, 2005. 613 p. (In Russian)

9. Kartashev A.V. Ecumenical Councils. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2006. 672 p. (In Russian)

10. Losskij V.N. Theophany. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 759 c. (In Russian)

11. Florovskij G. V. Eastern Fathers of the Church. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 637 p. (In Russian)

12. Russell Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, page xi. Simon & Schuster, 1972. P. 333.

13. Serafim Sobolev. New composition about Sofia of God's Wisdom. Jordanvill. N.Y. (USA): Holy Trinity Monastery, 1993. P. 269.


Review

Views: 1059


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)