EDUCATIONAL MODELS of the ORGANIZATION of SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF UNDERGRADUATES AND GRADUATE STUDENTS IN RUSSIA I V OF THE USA. Part 1: PLAN STAGE
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2017-3-9
Abstract
Positions of scientists and results of author's researches on problems of the organization of research activity at the universities of Russia and the United States of America are presented in article. Motives of the choice of a scientific subject and personal meanings of graduate students to performance of scientific research are considered. Mechanisms of the choice of a problem of a research are defined and functions of the research supervisor and the researcher at a stage of a plan of scientific work are opened. Authors brought and compared educational models of the organization of scientific research of students and graduate students in Russia and in the USA. In article are also given the content of activity of research supervisors in a foreshortening presented models of relationship them with young researchers at a stage of the choice of a problem and a subject of a research. Sources of scientific problems and ways of the description of the problem field of a research are shown. The similarity and difference of positions of research supervisors in the USA and Russia is determined by interaction problems with young researchers during preparation them to defense of a thesis. Article represents discussion of results of the author's research conducted in six higher education institutions of Russia and the USA.
About the Authors
E. Evans
Western New Mexico University
United States
United States
Evans Allison – PhD, political science, assistant professor of political science
E. B. Bystritskaya
Minin Nizhny Novgorod Statе Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bystritskaya Elena Vitalyevna – doctor of pedagogical sciences, associate professor, professor of department of the general and social pedagogics
R. U. Arifulina
Minin Nizhny Novgorod Statе Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Arifulin Ramil Umyarovna – to. item of N, associate professor, associate professor of the general and social pedagogics
References
1. Aleksandrova N.M., Markova S.M. Methodology of prognostic research of professional pedagogical education. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2015, no. 3(11), p. 13 (in Russian).
2. Bahtin M.M. To the methodology of the humanities. Razvitie lichnosti, 2008, no. 4, pp. 186-197 (in Russian).
3. Bordovskaja N.V., Kraevskij V.V. Fundamental and applied aspects of scientific work in the field of education. Pedagogika, 2005, no. 4, pp. 119-121 (in Russian).
4. Bystrickaja E.V., Dmitriev S.V., Neverkovich S.D., Voronin D.I. Is it necessary to change the methodological paradigms in the system of education in the field of physical culture and sports? Antropnye obrazovatel'nye tehnologii v sfere fizicheskoj kul'tury: sbornik statej po materialam II Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. 17 marta 2016 g.: v II t. [Anthropic educational technologies in the field of physical culture: a collection of articles on the materials of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. March 17, 2016: in the second volume]. N.Novgorod, Mininskij universitet Publ., 2016, t. 2, pp. 14-37 (in Russian).
5. Vaganova O.I. Technology of problem dialogue in vocational education. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2013, no. 4 (in Russian).
6. Gruzdeva M.L., Chanchina A.V. Designing an integrative-pedagogical system in professional educational institutions. N. Novgorod, 2009 (in Russian).
7. Dmitriev S.V., Neverkovich S.D., Voronin D.I. Semantic design and programming of actions in the context of the development of the consciousness of the educational subject. Mir psihologii, 2015, no. 4, pp. 185-187 (in Russian).
8. Zinchenko V.P. Thought and word: approaches LS. Vygotsky and G.G. Shpeta (part 2). Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie, 2014, no. 1, pp. 5-17 (in Russian).
9. Kulichenko A.I., Serdceva O.A., Shpakova A.E., Mamchenko T.V. Research work as a factor in the formation of professional competence of students of secondary professional educational institutions. Molodoj uchenyj, 2014, no. 19, pp. 567-569 (in Russian).
10. Kraevskij V.V. Methodological characteristics of scientific research. Narodnoe obrazovanie, 2010, no. 5, pp. 135-143 (in Russian).
11. Kraevskij V.V. Scientific research in pedagogy and modernity. Pedagogika, 2010, no. 2, pp. 13-20 (in Russian).
12. Markova S.M., Sedyh E.P. Theoretical bases of project management of educational systems. Nauka i shkola, 2011, no. 3, pp. 8-10 (in Russian).
13. Prohorova M.P., Vaganova O.I., Gladkova M.N., Gladkov A.I., Dvornikova E.I. Independent work of students in conditions of implementation of educational standards of higher education. Uspehi sovremennoj nauki, 2016, t. 1, no. 10, pp. 119-124 (in Russian).
14. Filatova O.N., Prohorova M.P. Development of methodological support of innovative training of teachers in the university. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija, 2015, no. 4, p. 164 (in Russian).
15. Hutorskoj A.V. Scientific school of human-like education: the concept and structure. Izvestija Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2009, no. 6, pp. 4-11 (in Russian).
16. Hutorskoj A.V. Metapredmetnoe content in the standards of a new generation. Shkol'nye tehnologii, 2012, no. 4, pp. 36-47 (in Russian).
17. Cyplakova S.A. Theoretical bases of design training of students in high school. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2014, no. 1 (in Russian).
18. Aksenov S., Arifulina R., Bistrickaya E., Burkhanova Y., Voronin D. Expansion of professional pedagogical thinking of master’s students in conditions of practice // Man in India. 2017. Vol. 97. Issue 3. P. 187-198.
19. Bistrickaya E., Burkhanova Y., Grigorieva E., Ivanova S. Rhizome-modular teach-ingofstudents as a basis of their professional creative self-consciousness formation // International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 2016. Vol. 11(2). P. 85-94.
20. Evans A. Ingram A.L., Hathorn L.G., Educates chat on the Internet // Computers & Education. 2010. Vol. 35(1). P. 21-35.
21. Evans A., Sil R. Science and education in is modern the university // Computers & Education. 2014. Vol. 18(1). P. 121-131.
22. Science Resources Statistics. Arlington, 2005. P. 2.
23. Science and Engineering Indicators. P. A 5-9, A 5-10.
24. World Bank Urges Action on R and D // The Moscow Times. 2006. 26 March.
Review
Views:
840
Email this article 