DESIGNING THE EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STUDENTS EDUCATIONAL-RESEARCH WORK AT THE UNIVERSITY
Abstract
When designing a competence model of training of future bachelor, it is necessary to use specially designed assessment forms that are based on active learning methods, focused on the formation of competencies. The article discusses the research work of students (UIRS) as a form for assessment of educational results of students at the University. The essence of this approach on the example of the design-build evaluation forms to evaluate the results of UIRS on the topic "Methods of teaching motor actions on the lessons of physical culture in schools," the process of studying the discipline "Methods of teaching physical culture." Presented in the study assessment form contains organizational, methodological, and substantive criteria and assessment part. For this example evaluation forms UIRS proposed criteria, rating scale and levels of achievement of educational outcomes.
About the Author
A. V. Stafeeva
Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
assistant professor of theoretical foundations of physical culture
Russian Federation
assistant professor of theoretical foundations of physical culture
References
1. Bordovskaja S.Ju. Ocenka urovnja sformirovannosti kljuchevyh kompetencij budushhih rabochih s pomoshh'ju kejs-metoda [Assessment of level of formation of key competences of future workers through the case method]. Vestnik TGPU (TPSU Bullletin), 2011, no. 13 (in Russian).
2. Garafutdinova G.R., Upshinskaja A.E. Model' ocenivanija professional'nyh kompetencij [Model of assessment of professional competencies]. Innovatsii v obrazovanii, 2011, no. 4, pp. 15-25 (in Russian).
3. Gusev A.N., Stafeeva A.V. Prikladnaja fizicheskaja podgotovka studentov kak osnova koncepcii razrabotki soderzhanija disciplin «Fizicheskaja kul'tura» v ramkah FGOS 3+ [Applied physical training of students as the basis of the concept of development of the contents disciplines of "Physical culture" in the framework of the FSES 3+]. Vestnik Tol'yattinskogo universiteta.2016, no. 4, pp. 57-64. (In Russian)
4. Gushhin Ju.V. Interaktivnye metody obuchenija v vysshej shkole [Interactive methods of learning in higher education]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo universiteta prirody, obshhestva i cheloveka «Dubna» (DubnaPsychologicalJournal), 2012, no. 2, pp.1-18 (in Russian).
5. Dudareva V.I., Panjukov A.V. Uchebno-issledovatel'skaja rabota. Problemy i perspektivy [Educational and research work. Problems and prospects]. Trudy Nauchno-pedagogicheskogo seminara «Nauka v shkole» [Proceedings of Scientific-pedagogical workshop "Science in School"]. Moscow, NTA «APFN» Publ., 2004, t.2, pp.131-141 (in Russian)
6. Eliseev I.N. Metodologija ocenki urovnja sformirovannosti kompetencij studentov [Methodology of estimation of level of formation of competences of students]. Informatika i obrazovanie, 2012, no. 4, pp.80-85 (in Russian).
7. Efremova N.F. Problemy formirovanija fondov ocenochnyh sredstv vuzov [Problems of formation of funds of assessment tools universities]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnja, 2011, no. 3, pp. 17-21 (in Russian).
8. Markova S.M. Proektirovanie uchebnyh zavedenij integrativnogo tipa [Design schools integrative type]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2013, no. 2. Available at: URL:http://http://www.mininuniver.ru/scientific/scientific_activities/vestnik/archive/no2 (in Russian).
9. Perevoshhikova E.N. Konceptual'nye osnovy konstruirovanija sredstv dlja ocenivanija obrazovatel'nyh rezul'tatov [Conceptual bases of designing of means for assessing learning outcomes]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2016, no. 2. Available at: http://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/reader/search/kontseptualnye-osnovy-konstruirovaniya-sredstv-dlya/ (accessed 7.10.2016) (in Russian).
10. Perevoshhikova E.N. Ocenka obrazovatel'nyh rezul'tatov [The assessment of educational outcomes]. Innovacii i innovacionnye tehnologii v nauke: sb. statej Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferencii (10 aprelja 2016 g., g. Moskva) [Innovations and innovation in science: Sat. Articles of the International scientific-practical conference (April 10, 2016, Moscow)]. Moscow, RIO EFIR Publ., 2016, pp. 58-60 (in Russian).
11. Professional'nyj standart. Pedagog (Pedagogicheskaja dejatel'nost' v doshkol'nom, nachal'nom obshhem, osnovnom obshhem, srednem obshhem obrazovanii) (Vospitatel', Uchitel'). Utverzhden prikazom Ministerstva truda i social'noj zashhity Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18 oktjabrja 2013 g. №44n. [The professional standard. Teacher (Educational activities in preschool, primary general, basic general, secondary general education) (Mentor, Teacher). Approved by order of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation dated October 18, 2013 No.44 n.] (in Russian).
12. Hutorskoj A.V. Sistemno-dejatel'nostnyj podhod v obuchenii: nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie [System and activity approach in education: scientific - methodological manual]. Moscow, «EHjdos» Publ., 2012. 63 p. (In Russian)
13. Federal'nyj gosudarstvennyj obrazovatel'nyj standart vysshego obrazovanija po napravleniju podgotovki 44.03.05 Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie (s dvumja profiljami podgotovki). Uroven' vysshego obrazovanija Bakalavriat. Utverzhden prikazom Ministerstva obrazovanija i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii ot 9 fevralja 2016 g. №91. [The Federal state educational standard of higher education in the field of training 44.03.05 Teacher education (with two training profiles). Level Undergraduate Higher Education. Russian Federation approved by Order of the Ministry of Education and Science on February 9, 2016. No. 91.]. (In Russian)
14. Vetrevich H. Matrica buksirov (TOWSmatrix) – instrument dlja situacionnogo analiticheskogo planirovanija [The tows matrix (TOWS matrix) is a tool for situational analytical planning ]. Dolgosrochnye plany, 1982, no. 15(2), pp.54-66. (In Russian)
15. Vil'son K.L., Hanna M.S. Rukovodstvo i kontekstnoe obuchenie v malyh gruppah. N.I. [The management and contextual learning in small groups. NI]. 1990. Pp. 8-12 (in Russian).
16. Shestkova G.L. Rihter T.V., Haritonova E.A. Ocenka obrazovatel'nyh rezul'tatov studentov pedagogicheskogo kolledzha s pomoshh'ju kejs-stadi [Evaluation of educational outcomes of students of pedagogical college with the help of case studies]. Indijskij zhurnal «Nauka i tehnologii», 2016, t.9, no. 21, pp.9-22. (In Russian)
Review
Views:
588
Email this article 