NEW APPROACHES TO DESIGN OF THE TARGET COMPONENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
Abstract
This article discusses the basic requirements for the formulation of the target component of the educational programmes implemented within the framework of the project of modernization of educational process at the Minin University. Modern requirements to the level of training of graduates are reflected in Federal State Educational Standards of higher education and professional standards of teachers. Analysis of these documents shows that often there is no relationship between them, which has a negative effect on the quality of the graduates. As a result, there is an objective need to establish consistency between the competences of the educational standard and labor actions of the professional standard, formulated in the form of learning outcomes. The proposed approach is based in the logic of the activity and competence-based approach reflects the learning plan specification as opposed to teaching in the learning process. Results of the approbation of new approach at Mininsky university are shown.
About the Authors
E. Y. Ilaltdinova
Minin Nizhny Novgorod Statе Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Education, professor, Head of the Department of General and Social Pedagogy
Russian Federation
Doctor of Education, professor, Head of the Department of General and Social Pedagogy
N. B. Vorobyov
Minin Nizhny Novgorod Statе Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Psychological Sciences, docent, Head of the Department of TFPC
Russian Federation
Candidate of Psychological Sciences, docent, Head of the Department of TFPC
References
1. Ilaltdinova E.Ju., Aksenov S.I. Istoricheskij kontekst modernizacii pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija [The historical context of the modernization of pedagogical education]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2016, no. 2. Available at: http://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/upload/iblock/a68/ilaltdinova.pdf (accessed 30.10.2016) (in Russian).
2. Kasprzhak A.G., Kalashnikov S.P. Modeli podgotovki pedagogicheskih kadrov v akademicheskom bakalavriate i issledovatel'skoj magistrature: prezentacija [Models of teacher training in the academic bachelor's and master's research: presentation]. Available at: http://pedagogicheskoeobrazovanie.rf/documents/lists (accessed 30.10.2016) (in Russian).
3. Kashtanova S.N., Kudrjavcev V.A. Sillabus kak instrument reglirovanija uchebnoj dejatel'nosti studentov [Syllabus as an educational activity of students the tool of regulation]. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2016, no. 2. Available at: http://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/upload/iblock/747/kashtanova.pdf (accessed 30.10.2016) (in Russian).
4. Proektirovanie uchebno-metodicheskogo obespechenija modulej innovacionnoj obrazovatel'noj programmy: metodicheskoe posobie [Design of training modules and methodological support of innovative educational program: handbook]. Pod red. C.A. Goncharova. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gercena, 2007. 159 p. (In Russian)
5. Smirnov S.A. Obrazovatel'nye rezul'taty v kategorijah antropologicheskogo diskursa [Obrazovatel'nye rezul'taty v kategorijah antropologicheskogo diskursa]. Materialy XV Vserossijskoj konferencii «Pedagogika razvitija: obrazovatel'nye rezul'taty, ih izmerenie i ocenka» 21 – 23 aprelja 2008 goda, g. Krasnojarsk [Proceedings of the XV All-Russian Conference "Pedagogy of: educational results, their measurement and evaluation" on April 21-23, 2008, Krasnoyars]. Available at: http://www.antropolog.ru/doc/persons/smirnov/smirnov20 (accessed 22.01.2016) (in Russian)
6. Frolova S.V. Organizacija sobytij individual'nogo obrazovatel'nogo marshruta vneuchebnoj dejatel'nosti studentov [Organization of the event an individual educational route extracurricular activities of students: Textbook]. Pod red. V.V. Nikolinoj. N. Novgorod: NGPU im. K. Minina. 2013. (In Russian)
7. Armstrong G. RBM Training. Six reasons to Use Result-Based Management [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.rbmtraining.com/6_reasons_to_use_RBM.html (accessed 22.01.2016).
8. Baume D. Writing and using good learning outcomes [Electronic resource]. Leeds Metropolitan University, 2009. Available at: https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/publications/files/Learning_Outcomes.pdf (accessed 01.11.2016).
9. Bingham R. Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria. Learning and Teaching Institute Sheffield Hallam University. 2002 [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.bolton.ac.uk/quality/pda/moduleandprogrammedesign/documents/learnoutcomesasscrit eria.pdf (accessed 30.10.2016).
10. Bloom B. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals // In Bloom B.S. (Ed.) Susan Fauer Company, Inc., 1956. Pp. 201-207.
11. Davies A. Writing Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria in Art and Design [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://arts.brighton.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/67278/WritingLearning-Outcomes-and-Assessment-Criteria-in-Art-and-Design.pdf (accessed 30.10.2016).
12. Kennedy D., Hyland Á., Ryan N. Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: a Practical Guide. Implementing Bologna in your institution. C 3.4-1.30 рp. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.tcd.ie/teaching-learning/academic-development/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_ Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdf (accessed 22.01.2016).
13. Methodical Instruction on the Modularisation of Teaching. the OP EC project entitled Increasing the Permeability between SOKRATES and Universities, registration number CZ.1.07/2.1.00/32.0079. 2013 [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.sokrates.cz/vos/wpcontent/uploads/2014/05/Methodical-Instruction-on-the-Modularisation-of-Teaching.pdf (accessed 30.10.2016).
14. Moon J. The Module and Programme Development Handbook: A Practical Guide to Linking Levels, Outcomes and Assessment Criteria. London: Kogan Page, 2002.
15. Osters S., Tiu F.S. Writing Measurable Learning Outcomes. 3rd Annual Texas A&M Assessment Conference. Austin, US. 2003 [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.gavilan.edu/research/spd/Writing-Measurable-Learning-Outcomes.pdf (accessed 30.10.2016).
16. Ramsden P. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London, UK: Kogan Page, 2003.
Review
Views:
557
Email this article 