Formation of personal formations constituting the psychological structure of personality resilience of adolescents, high school students and students in the conditions of modern educational environment

Introduction. The analysis of theoretical approaches to the study of personality resilience is given, which allowed to determine the importance of creating a specially organized educational environment for its development. The program for the formation of personality resilience to difficult life situations, based on the author's concept of the psychological structure of resilience and its implementation in the educational environment of school, university is presented. The analysis of the dynamics of the results of the study of the most important personal formations that make up the psychological structure of personality resilience of adolescents, high school students, and undergraduates according to the results of the forming program is carried out.

Materials and Methods. The sample: 623 people, including 196 students, 427 schoolchildren; the program of the forming experiment Upon completion of the forming program, a control section was conducted to study the components of the psychological structure of resilience.When conducting the control section, the same psychodiagnostic tools were used: questionnaire S. S. Goncharova “Ways of overcoming negative situations”, Test for unfinished sentences (J. Sachs and S. Levy). S. Goncharova's questionnaire “Ways of overcoming negative situations”, Test on incomplete sentences (J. Sachs and S. Levy) Personality diagnostic technique on motivation to success, T. Ehlers, Personality diagnostic technique on avoidance of failures, T. Ehlers, Affiliation questionnaire A. Mehrabian, Methodology of personality diagnostics on motivation to success, T. Ehlers, Methodology of personality diagnostics on avoidance of failures, T. Ehlers, Affiliation questionnaire. Mehrabian, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, N.S. Endler in co-authorship with D.A. Parker, Uncertainty Tolerance Questionnaire, M. McLean, Resilience Test (method by S. Muddy, adapted by D.A. Leontiev). The results were processed using methods of mathematical statistics (Student's T-criterion, correlation analysis), computer program STATISTIKA (version 10.0).

Results. As a result of the implementation of the formative program, the number of strategies related to social support in difficult life situations has increased among all age groups, positive dynamics and acceleration in the development of strategies for overcoming negative situations through switching to various types of activity in all age groups have been observed; the number of adolescents and students choosing care rather than solving the problem has significantly decreased; among high school students and students , there is a positive trend in reducing the choice of a blame-finding strategy; there is a dynamic increase in positive attitude towards oneself among all age groups; the number of people in all age groups with a low level of motivation for success has decreased; there has been an increase in the choice of problem-oriented behavior; an increase in the number of students who showed a high level of acceptance in a false, uncertain situation in all age groups; there has been a positive dynamics of involvement in what is happening, interest in activity in all age groups; positive dynamics of the indicator of general resilience among respondents of all age groups.

Discussion and Conclusions. It can be concluded that the obtained data testify in favor of the effectiveness of the proposed program. It should be noted the positive influence of the formative program that promotes accelerated and purposeful formation of the most important personal formations that make up the psychological structure of the author's understanding of personality resilience of adolescents, high school students and students.

1. Averin V. A. Psychology of children and adolescents. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo Mihajlova V. A. Publ., 1998. 379 p. (In Russ.)

2. Anufrieva O. V. Psychological determinants of adolescents' resistance to asocial influences: abstract of the dissertation of a candidate of psychological sciences. Bishkek, 2018. 23 p. (In Russ.)

3. Baeva I. A. Psychological safety in education. St. Petersburg, SOYUZ Publ., 2002. 271 p. (In Russ.)

4. Bityuckaya E. V. Modern approaches to the study of coping with difficult life situations. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya, 2011, no. 1, pp. 100-101. (In Russ.)

5. Bozhovich L. I. Problems of personality formation / ed. D. I. Feldshteyna. Moscow, Institut prakticheskoj psihologii Publ., Voronezh, NPO «MODEK» Publ., 1995. 352 p. (In Russ.)

6. Bozhovich L. I. Personality resilience, process and conditions of its formation. XVIII Mezhdunarodnyj psihologicheskij kongress. Simpozium No. 35. Moscow, 1966. Pp. 326-331. (In Russ.)

7. Belinskaya E. P. Coping with difficulties in the era of uncertainty and global risks: main research trends. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2022, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 760-771. (In Russ.)

8. Gayazova L. A. Cross-cultural studies of resistance resources in childhood. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena, 2011, no. 139, pp. 35-40. (In Russ.)

9. Gorohovatskij L. YU. Formation of psychological resistance of the personality of future customs specialist to professional difficulties: abstract of the dissertation of a candidate of psychological sciences. Volgograd, 2013. 23 p. (In Russ.)

10. Dubrovin D. N. Psychological adaptation as a factor of personal self-determination in late adolescence. Mir psihologii, 2007, no. 4, pp. 64-75. (In Russ.)

11. Dunaeva N. I., Sorokoumova S. N. Psychological structure of personality resistance of adolescents, high school students and students: main empirical results. Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo voennogo instituta vojsk nacional'noj gvardii, 2024, no. 1(26), pp. 109-117. (In Russ.)

12. ZHukov A. M. Stress in the life of officers of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and its psychoprophylaxis: dissertation of the candidate of psychological sciences. Moscow, VU MO RF Publ., 2004. 195 p. (In Russ.)

13. Ivanova S. P. Psychological stability of the individual as a factor in counteracting the negative influences of the social environment in early adolescence and youth. Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Social'no-gumanitarnye nauki, 2009, no. 9, pp. 99-108. (In Russ.)

14. Ionesku SH. Resistance and related concepts. Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost', ustojchivost', psihotravma: sbornik nauchnyh statej Pervogo mezhdunarodnogo foruma / pod red. I. A. Baevoj, SH. Ionesku, L. A. Regush. St. Petersburg, 2006. Pp. 17-20. (In Russ.)

15. Kryukova T. L. Psychology of coping behavior in different periods of life: dissertation of the doctor of psychological sciences. Kostroma, 2005. 473 p. (In Russ.)

16. Laktionova A. I. The relationship between viability and social adaptation of adolescents: abstract of the dissertation of a candidate of psychological sciences. Moscow, 2010. 24 p. (In Russ.)

17. Narushevich A. A. On the phenomenon of resistance in modern foreign psychology. Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya, 2007, no. 42, pp. 7-9. (In Russ.)

18. Posohova S. T. The risk of destructive behavior of adolescents: causes and resources of resistance. Psihologiya obrazovaniya: regional'nyj opyt: materialy vtoroj nacional'noj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Moscow, 2005. Pp. 65-66. (In Russ.)

19. Psychology of safety as a basis for humanitarian technologies in social interaction: scientific and methodological materials / edited by prof. I. A. Baeva. St. Petersburg, OOO «Knizhnyj Dom» Publ., 2008. 288 p. (In Russ.)

20. Psychology of communication and trust: theory and practice: collection of materials of the International conference of the Ural Russian Academy of Education, Pi RAO, Moscow State University. November 6-7, 2014 / edited by T. P. Skripkina. Moscow, Universitet RAO Publ., 2014. 777 p. (In Russ.)

21. Sorokoumova S. N., Dunaeva N. I. Study of the resistance of the personality of adolescents, high school students and students to difficult life situations. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2022, vol. 24, no. 6(94), pp. 802-808. (In Russ.)

22. Garmezy N. Stress resilient children: the search for protective factors // Stevenson J. E. (ed.) Recent research in developmental psychopathology. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1985. Pp. 213- 233.

23. Maddi S. R. Relevance of Hardiness Assessment and Training to the Military Context. Military Psychology, 2007, vol. 19 (1), pp. 61-70, https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600701323301.

24. McDonald M., McCormack D., Avdagic E., Hayes L., et al. Understanding resilience: Similarities and differences in the perceptions of children, parents and practitioners. Children and Youth Services Review, 2019, vol. 99, pp. 270-278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.016.

25. Sanders J., Munford R., Boden J. Culture and context: The differential impact of culture, risks and resources on resilience among vulnerable adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 2017, vol. 79, pp. 517-526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.07.007.

26. Troy A. S., Willroth E. C., Shallcross A. J., Giuliani N. R., Gross J. J. Psychological Resilience: An Affect-Regulation Framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 2023, vol. 74, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020122-041854.

27. Zolkoski S. M., Bullock L. M. Resilience in children and youth: а review. Children and Youth Services Review, 2012, vol. 34(12), pp. 2295-2303, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009.