Formation of a polypositional team in the conditions of continuing advanced education

Introduction. In the conditions of transformational changes in the higher education system, focused on building a nationally oriented education and ensuring technological and ideological sovereignty of the Russian Federation, one of the basic requirements is the creation of new models of human resource development management and the design of team-distributed work of an educational organization, including the processes of reprogramming, rethinking the results of professional activity to achieve leadership positions of professorships.-the teaching staff of the university.

The authors of the article attempt to present a managerial mechanism for the formation of a polypositional team of organizational changes in the conditions of the formation of a new strategy for the development of a pedagogical university with the application of the theory of self-learning organization as a methodological framework for designing the content of cross-functional teams in business education. Based on the analysis of this theory of team building in the organization, the philosophy and essence of the reflexive management mechanism aimed at establishing the position of strategic leadership and achieving results due to the transfunctional (synergetic) effect in situations of uncertainty and multitasking are revealed.

The article discusses the mechanisms of forming a polypositional team as a universal network resource for co-organizing positions within the framework of managing the development of a system of continuous advanced pedagogical education and experimental testing of the results of the federal innovation area of the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of the Russian Federation "Network project for training mentors for development" (2022-2027).

The аim of the article is determined by the need to present a new organizational and managerial format, the essence of which is to create an educational space for the co-organization of subjects of continuous advanced education, including network design zones: problem, information, design and organizational activity zone (broadcasting and scaling results and experience). The designated organizational format sets the ways and meanings of the formation of a new professional position of the project participants in the preparation of a mentor for development.

Materials and Methods. The development of a mechanism for the formation of a polypositional team as a team of professionals - leaders of organizational change is based on the methodology used in business education when managing a team–building system under the leadership of leaders of change, on an interdisciplinary methodology for creating a self-learning organization and on the principles of a convergent approach. At the initial stage, the project participants were offered two methods used to assess the transformational leadership of the organization's leaders, namely: a scale of self-assessment of innovative personality qualities (N.M. Lebedev, A.N. Tatarko) and a test for assessing managerial (managerial) style of behavior (I. Adizes method).

Results. A management mechanism for the formation of a polypositional team in the conditions of continuous advanced education has been developed, a methodology for the organization of network design and diagnostics of leadership and innovative personality qualities of the leaders of a network project for the training of a mentor for development has been defined, and positions at the stages of event meetings within the framework of a project experiment of the federal innovation platform of the Ministry of Higher Education have been identified and Science of the Russian Federation "A network project for training mentors for development", that allowed us to substantiate the hypothesis about the effectiveness of the developed conditions for the transformation of the pedagogical profile university and its leading position in the system of regional education and Russian as a whole.

Discussion and Conclusions. The degree of novelty of the research results is determined by the authors in two interrelated aspects. The fundamental novelty is represented by a set of provisions and ideas in the proposed universal mechanism for the formation of a polypositional code in the context of the theory of self-learning organization and the justification of the regularity of the relationship of the project-type content in the construction of event meetings and new formats of continuous advanced adult education, which qualify as a solution to the scientific problem of designing strategies and programs for the development of the university of design- of a programmatic nature. The novelty at the level of concretization and refinement of the results is represented by the organization of the project experiment and the methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of the developed conditions for the formation of a polypositional team of continuous advanced pedagogical education, the implementation of which increases the productivity of scientific research and its practical and socio-cultural significance.

1. Avilov A. V. Reflexive control. Methodological grounds: monograph. Moscow, 2003. 174 p. (In Russ.)

2. Adizes I. K. Ideal leader. Why you can’t become one and what follows from this: translation from English. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2007. 262 p. (In Russ.)

3. Adizes I. K. Management styles – effective and ineffective: translation from English. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2009. 199 p. (In Russ.)

4. Adizes I. K. How to overcome management crises. Diagnostics and solution of management problems: translation from English. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., 2014. 430 p. (In Russ.)

5. Adizes I. K. Development of leaders: how to understand your management style and effectively communicate with carriers of other styles: translation from English. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2018. 259 p. (In Russ.)

6. Alekseev N. G. Project approach to the formation of reflective thinking in education and management. Refleksivno organizacionnye problemy formirovaniya myshleniya i lichnosti v obrazovanii i upravlenii: sbornik statej / otv. red.-sost. I. N. Semenov, T. G. Boldina. Moscow, IRPTiGO Publ., 2003. Pp. 51-65. (In Russ.)

7. Asmolov A. G. Psychology of modern times: challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, no. 8 (40), https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i40.550. (In Russ.)

8. Balabanova E. S., Deminskaya V. E. Manager as a transformational leader: the role of personal qualities and management practices. Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta, 2017, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 263-288. (In Russ.)

9. Bermus A. G. Digital transformation of higher education from the perspective of an interdisciplinary approach: the image of humanitarian research. Kant, 2022, no. 1 (42), pp. 6-16. (In Russ.)

10. Gromyko YU. V. Personalization in education: initiating education, raising consciousness and personal growth. Antropologicheskie matricy HKH veka. L. S. Vygotskij – P. A. Florenskij: nesostoyavshijsya dialog. – Priglashenie k dialogu / A. A. Andryushkov [i dr.]. Moscow, 2007. Pp. 52-98. (In Russ.)

11. Davydov V. V. Theory of developmental training. Moscow, INTOR Publ., 1996. 544 p. (In Russ.)

12. Efimchuk O. S. Leadership potential as a special quality of a modern specialist. Uchenye zapiski OGU. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i social'nye nauki, 2012, no. 1, pp. 349-353. (In Russ.)

13. Ignat'eva G. A., Sdobnyakov V. V., Tulupova O. V. Methodology for designing personalized tracks for advanced training of teachers based on the results of complex diagnostics of the formation of professional competencies: monograph / ed. G. A. Ignatieva. Moscow: Znanie-M, 2022. 326 p. (In Russ.)

14. Ignat'eva G. A., Sdobnyakov V. V. Design of personalized additional professional education for teachers: event-positional methodology. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2022, vol. 10, no. 3 (40), doi: 10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-3-7. (In Russ.)

15. Klarin M. V. Tool of innovative education: organizational and activity-based pedagogy. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek, 2016, no. 1 (13), pp. 1-18. (In Russ.)

16. Knyazeva E. N. Transdisciplinary research strategies. Vestnik TGPU, 2011, no. 10, pp. 193-201. (In Russ.)

17. Knyazeva P. S. Psychological characteristics of a leader as a factor in the formation of corporate culture. Tomsk, NITGU Publ., 2023. 118 p. (In Russ.)

18. Korneli Dzh, Danoff Dzh. CH. Paragogy: synergy of independent and organized educational activities. Problemy upravleniya v social'nyh sistemah, 2014, no. 11, pp. 84-97. (In Russ.)

19. Lazarev V. S. The crisis of the “activity approach” in psychology and possible ways to overcome it. Voprosy filosofii, 2001, no. 3, pp. 33-48. (In Russ.)

20. Mamardashvili M. K. Possible person. Moscow, Ripol-Klassik Publ., 2019. 495 p. (Figures of Philosophy). (In Russ.)

21. Mokij V. S., Luk'yanova T. A. Transdisciplinarity: stereotypes, approaches and directions. Universum: obshchestvennye nauki: elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal, 2021, no. 3 (72), doi: 10.32743/UniSoc.2021.72-3.7-19. (In Russ.)

22. National doctrine of education of the Russian Federation. Project / ed. Corresponding member RAO V.I. Slobodchikova. Ed. 2nd, corrected and supplemented. Moscow, 2022. 34 p. Availableat: https://rnk-concept.ru/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/777-2022_Doktrina.pdf (accessed: 22.07.2023). (In Russ.)

23. Popov A. A., Proskurovskaya I. D. Pedagogical anthropology in the context of the idea of self-determination. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2007, no. 3, pp. 186-198. (In Russ.)

24. Rozin V. M., Kovaleva T. M. Personalization or individualization: psychological-anthropological or cultural-environmental approaches. Pedagogika, 2020, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 18-28. (In Russ.)

25. Samerhanova E. K., Krupoderova E. P., Panova I. V. Digital resources for organizing the educational process and assessing the achievements of students in a distance format: a review of digital resources for distance education. Nizhny Novgorod, Mininskij universitet Publ., 2020. 50 p. (In Russ.)

26. Sdobnyakov V. V., Ignat'eva G. A., Tulupova O. V., Sotkina S. A., Moiseenko A. V. Network project for training development mentors: a practice-oriented monograph. Nizhny Novgorod, 2022. 64 p. (In Russ.)

27. Senge P. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of a self-learning organization: translation from English. Moscow, ZAO «Olimp-Biznes» Publ., 2003. 408 p. (In Russ.)

28. Slobodchikov V. I. Anthropological perspective of domestic education. Moscow – Ekaterinburg, Publishing department of the Ekaterinburg diocese, 2009. 264 p. (In Russ.)

29. Slobodchikov V. I., Ignat'eva G. A. Postgraduate education of teachers: anthropological projection. CHelovek i obrazovanie, 2014, no. 3 (40), pp. 13-20. (In Russ.)

30. Sovetova O. S. Social psychology of innovation. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Publishing House, 2000. 264 p. (In Russ.)

31. Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation / ed. A. Yu. Uvarova and I. D. Frumina. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2019. Pp. 205-214. (In Russ.)

32. SHCHedrovickij G. P. Reflection in activity. Voprosy metodologii, 1994, no. 3-4, pp. 76-121. (In Russ.)

33. YAkushkina M. S., Ilakavichus M. R. Methods and forms of self-organization of communities of different ages in event networks of informal education. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2021, no. 2 (214), pp. 125-133. (In Russ.)

34. Hase St., Kenyon C. Moving from andragogy to heutagogy in vocational education. Research to Reality: Putting VET Research To Work. Proceedings of the Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA) Conference (4th, Adelaide, Australia, March 28-30, 2001). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37357847_Moving_from_ andragogy_to_heutagogy_implications_for_VET (accessed: 15.10.2023).

35. Knowles M. S. The Modern Practice of Adult Education. From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Chicago, Association Press, 1980. 400 р.