Phylogenesis and ontogenesis of intelligence future officer

Introduction. The article raises the question of the causes, conditions and circumstances of the development of intelligence, the existence and possibility of the emergence of intelligence in ontogenesis or phylogenesis. It seems necessary to understand the features of the formation of personality and subjectivity in individual or collective development, which, in turn, requires an understanding of issues relevant to the domestic intelligentsia: the relationship / conjugation of personal and public, public and state, state and personal. At the same time, intercultural and interpersonal communication acts as a real field for objectification and deobjectification of values and the realization of intelligence as a personality trait, and reflection is the mechanism for improving intelligence.

Materials and Methods. The study of the social existence of intelligence in ontogenesis and phylogenies was carried out from the standpoint of modern psychological approaches: axiological; activity; systemic; subjective. Within the framework of these scientific positions, the main methods for obtaining scientific information in this study were: analysis; abstraction; analogy; deduction; generalization; synthesis; comparison.

Results. Intelligence is a dynamic structure, the core of which is the value-semantic sphere, a high level of culture and education, and the field for the implementation of intelligence is social subjective activity. At the same time, interpersonal communication with representatives of the intelligentsia or subjects of intelligence is a necessary condition for its development in the personality structure. Communication acts as a medium and source for the development of intelligence. Since intelligence always manifests itself in relation to another, others, nature and oneself, it develops in various forms of collective interaction and communication.

Discussions and Conclusions. The communicative and reflexive nature of intelligence, as well as its focus on the implementation of the ideas of justice and equality between social subjects, allow us to say that the real field of its implementation and objectification into objects of social activity is inters objective interaction. This, in turn, is realized and functions in the field of culture, the processes of objectification and deobjectification of values. Intelligence is a dynamic structure, the core of which is the value-semantic sphere, a high level of culture and education, and the field for the implementation of intelligence is social subjective activity.

1. Baranova, G.V. Rol' intelligencii v ustojchivosti rossijskogo obshhestva / G.V. Baranova, A.A. Baranov, I.E. Novikov // Izvestija Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2021. № 1. S. 70‒79. (In Russ.)

2. Zherebcova, V.A. Mehanizmy organizacii vysshih psihicheskih funkcij (obzor literatury s pozicij teorii haosa i samoorganizacii sistem) // Vestnik novyh medicinskih tehnologij. Jelektronnoe izdanie. 2022. T. 16. № 4. S. 42–48. DOI 10.24412/2075-4094-2022-4-1-6. (In Russ.)

3. Zapesockij, A.S. Kul'turologicheskoe nasledie D.S. Lihacheva / A.S. Zapesockij // Voprosy filosofii. 2017. № 5. S. 5‒14. (In Russ.)

4. Zinchenko, Ju.P. Metodologicheskie problemy fundamental'nyh i prikladnyh psihologicheskih issledovanij // Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2011. № 1 (5). S. 42‒49. (In Russ.)

5. Kagan, M.S. Vosproizvodstvo Rossijskoj intelligencii kak pedagogicheskaja problema // Formirovanie rossijskogo intelligenta v universitete / Sankt-Peterburgskij gumanitarnyj universitet profsojuzov. Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskij gumanitarnyj universitet profsojuzov, 2000. S. 120‒152. (In Russ.)

6. Keleman, L.A. Sub#ektno-ob#ektnye osnovanija celostnogo osmyslenija intelligentnosti // Intelligencija i mir. 2007. № 4. S. 15–27. (In Russ.)

7. Keleman, L.A. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie osnovanija issledovanija intelligentnosti // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Sociologija. 2005. № 1. S. 27–39. (In Russ.)

8. Keleman, L.A. Intelligencija kak obrazovannyj sloj rossijskogo obshhestva // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2005. № 287. S. 96–101. (In Russ.)

9. Leont'ev, A.N. Znachenie i smysl // Mir psihologii. 2001. № 2 (26). S. 13‒20. (In Russ.)

10. Leont'ev, D.A. Sub#ektivnoe kachestvo vremeni kak ob#ekt psihologicheskoj diagnostiki / D.A. Leont'ev, E.N. Osin // Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2022. № 83. S. 223‒229. (In Russ.)

11. Leont'ev, D.A. Smysloobrazovanie i ego konteksty: zhizn', struktura, kul'tura, opyt // Mir psihologii. 2014. № 1 (77). S. 104‒117. (In Russ.)

12. Leont'ev, D.A. Dejatel'nost' (popytka jenciklopedicheskogo opredelenija) // Mir psihologii. 2014. № 3 (79). S. 101‒104. (In Russ.)

13. Levin, G.D. Chto est' potrebnost'? // Voprosy filosofii. 2019. № 11. S. 56–65. DOI 10.31857/S004287440007353-3. (In Russ.)

14. Lihachev, D.S. O russkoj intelligencii: pis'mo v redakciju // Novyj mir. 2004. № 2. S. 3‒9. (In Russ.)

15. Loginova, N.A. Ocherk teorii individual'nogo psihicheskogo razvitija B.G. Anan'eva // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2014. T. 35. № 2. S. 91–102. (In Russ.)

16. Lotman, Ju.M. Besedy o russkoj kul'ture [Tekst]: byt i tradicii russkogo dvorjanstva (XVIII – nachalo XIX veka) / Ju.M. Lotman. [2-e izd.]. Sankt-Peterburg: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2008. 412 s. (In Russ.)

17. Mansurova, S.E. Onto-filogeneticheskie aspekty dejatel'nostnogo podhoda v obrazovanii // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2015. № 3-1. S. 9–18. (In Russ.)

18. Naumov, P.Ju. Psihologicheskie mehanizmy razvitija intelligentnosti budushhego oficera // Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. 2022. T. 10. № 3. DOI 10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-3-18. (In Russ.)

19. Naumov, P.Ju. Psihologicheskaja priroda intelligentnosti oficera / P.Ju. Naumov, F.V. Povshednaja // Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. 2020. T. 8. № 2 (31). S. 12. (In Russ.)

20. Naumov, P.Ju. Psihologicheskaja struktura intelligentnosti budushhego oficera: sistemnyj podhod i mezhdisciplinarnyj analiz // Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. 2021. T. 9. № 2 (35). S. 10.DOI 10.26795/2307-1281-2021-9-2-10. (In Russ.)

21. Naumov, P.Ju. Problema vyjavlenija uslovij i sredstv razvitija intelligentnosti budushhih oficerov // Izvestija Baltijskoj gosudarstvennoj akademii rybopromyslovogo flota: psihologo-pedagogicheskie nauki. 2021. № 4 (58). S. 199–202. DOI 10.46845/2071-5331-2021-4-58-199-202. (In Russ.)

22. Naumova, T.V. Mozhno li nyne schitat' rossijskuju intelligenciju osobym sociokul'turnym fenomenom? // Filosofija i kul'tura. 2018. № 6. S. 78‒89. (In Russ.)

23. Naumova, T.V. Sohranilas' li v pamjati naroda russkaja intelligencija kak sociokul'turnyj fenomen? // Social'no-gumanitarnye znanija. 2016. № 2. S. 50‒65. (In Russ.)

24. Smirnova, A.R. Otvetstvennost' kak vysshaja psihicheskaja funkcija lichnosti (na primere koncepcii L.S. Vygotskogo) // Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologija. 2020. T. 8. № 2. S. 5. (In Russ.)

25. Sokolov, A.V. Formula intelligentnosti. Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 5. S. 57‒67. (In Russ.)

26. Stepanov, S.S. Jetapy razvitija lichnosti. Filogenez i ontogenez // Iniciativy XXI veka. 2016. № 1. S. 60–61. (In Russ.)

27. Stepin, V.S. Filosofskij analiz mirovozzrencheskih universalij kul'tury // Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2011. № 1. S. 8‒17. (In Russ.)

28. Tendrjakova, M.V. «Pervobytnoe» myshlenie i myshlenie rebenka: peresekajushhiesja paralleli // Voprosy psihologii. 2021. № 1. S. 92–105. (In Russ.)

29. Ushakova, T.N. O filogeneze jazyka cheloveka (kognitivno-psihologicheskij analiz) // Voprosy psiholingvistiki. 2018. № 37. S. 126–137. DOI 10.30982/2077-5911-2018-37-3-126-137. (In Russ.)

30. Frolov, D.E., Somkina, A.N. Lichnost' i ee vozniknovenie v ontogeneze i filogeneze // Gumanitarij: aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnoj nauki i obrazovanija. 2018. № 3. S. 341–351. DOI: 10.15507/2078-9823.043.018.201803.341-351. (In Russ.)

31. Chesnokova, O.B., Subbotskij, E.V. Social'nyj intellekt v uslovijah slozhnyh social'nyh sistem // Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2010. № 2(4). S. 22–29. (In Russ.)