Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

Formation of resistance to the personality of students in the conditions of modern educational environment

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2023-11-1-10

Abstract

   Introduction. In the conditions of modernization of the education system, the problem of the formation of personality resistance in the educational environment becomes relevant. On the basis of domestic research on the psychology of the environment, an analysis was made of the characteristics, criteria, conditions, approaches to the requirements for the modern educational environment, which will contribute to the formation of psychological determinants of personality resistance. The formation of personal resistance in the educational environment is possible in an innovative personality-developing environment, which should be psychologically safe, humanitarian - based on humanistic and moral values. A system of psychological support is presented, which is based on the principles of trust, using a polysubjective approach. The analysis and comparison of the results of the ascertaining and forming experiment was carried out in order to determine the effectiveness of the activity of the personality-developing environment on a group of students of 1-2 courses of the socionomic profile.
   Materials and Methods. The work used a diagnostic complex, which makes it possible to determine the component structure in order to study the manifestation of personality resistance in the subjects, and also carried out a meaningful analysis and comparison of the results of the ascertaining and forming experiment with the aim of the effectiveness of the program of the forming experiment.
   Results. As a result of the implementation of the formative program, students are dominated by a high level of development of all components of the psychological structure of resistance, which is characterized by a wide range of knowledge about behavior strategies in various situations. A tendency was found to increase the choice of terminal values in comparison with instrumental ones. A more detailed analysis showed that among the terminal values among the groups of subjects, the indicators of long-term goals, which ensure self-development and predicting behavior strategies in various situations, increased. According to the analysis of the content characteristics of instrumental values, the following can be noted: the students' indicators for ethical and business values increased, as well as the indicators for self-affirmation values and, which is especially interesting, for altruistic values. All this, in our opinion, testifies to the assimilation of a wide range of social actions by all subjects in the process of practice (especially in volunteer activities). In the group of students, the values of business and the values of self-affirmation prevail, the values of communication are much less pronounced. It should also be noted that altruistic values are quite clearly represented among students, which indicates an increase in the stability of the individual. An interesting fact, from the point of view of our study, is the lack of individualistic and conformist values among students. It should be noted that the personal position of the subjects has changed significantly in terms of deepening subjectivity, more balanced indicators are observed.
   Discussion and Conclusions. The study was aimed at testing the system of psychological support in the process of formation of resistance as a personality trait in the subjects – students showed its effectiveness. As a result of the implementation of the formative program, a high level of development of the presented components of the psychological structure of resistance prevails.

About the Authors

N. I. Dunaeva
St. Petersburg Military Order of Zhukov Institute of National Guard of the Russian Federation; National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lobachevsky
Russian Federation

Natalia I. Dunaeva, Candidate of psychological Sciences, associate Professor, applicant

St. Petersburg

Nizhny Novgorod



P. A. Gordeeva
Novosibirsk Military Institute of the Order of Zhukov Army General I. K. Yakovlev of the troops of the National Guard of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Gordeeva Polina A., Professor

Department of Social and Human Sciences

Novosibirsk



S. N. Sorokoumova
St. Petersburg Military Order of Zhukov Institute of National Guard of the Russian Federation; Novosibirsk Military Institute of the Order of Zhukov Army General I. K. Yakovlev of the troops of the National Guard of the Russian Federation; Russian State Social University Moscow
Russian Federation

Svetlana N. Sorokoumova, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor at the Faculty, Professor of the Department

Faculty of Political and Social Sciences

Department of Inclusive Social Groups

Faculty Special Forces

Department of Service and Combat Use
of Special Forces

Faculty of Advanced Training of Highly Qualified Personnel and Additional Professional Education

Department of Military Scientific Research 

St. Petersburg

Novosibirsk

Moscow



References

1. Baeva I. A. Psychological safety in education. St. Petersburg, SOYUZ Publ., 2002. 271 p. (In Russ.)

2. Baeva I. A., Volkova E. N., Gayazova L. A., Ibragimova A. G., Laktionova E. B., Yudin N. V. Security psychology as a basis for humanitarian technologies in social interaction. St. Petersburg, OOO «Knizhnyj Dom» Publ., 2008. 288 p. (In Russ.)

3. Belinskaya E. P. Coping with difficulties in the era of uncertainty and global risks: main research trends. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2022, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 760-771. (In Russ.)

4. Bozhovich L. I. Personality and its formation in childhood. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 400 p. (In Russ.)

5. Vachkov I. V. Polysubject interaction in the educational environment. Zhjurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. Psihologiya, 2014, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 36-50. (In Russ.)

6. Volkova E. N. The subjectivity of the teacher: Theory and practice: the dissertation of the doctor of psychological sciences. Moscow, 1998. 308 p. (In Russ.)

7. Vygotskij L. S. Collected Works. Moscow, Direkt-Media Publ., 2008. 928 p. (In Russ.)

8. Grigor'eva M. V. Psychological structure and dynamics of interactions between the educational environment and the student in the process of his school adaptation: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the doctor of psychological sciences. Saratov, 2009. 52 p. (In Russ.)

9. Grishina E. V. Psychological safety of the educational environment and anti-vital experiences of adolescents. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena, 2016, no. 182, pp. 97-103. (In Russ.)

10. Dubrovina I. V., Danilova E. E., Prihozhan A. M.. Psychology. 2nd ed. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2003. 464 p. (In Russ.)

11. Dunaeva N. I. Studying the influence of subjectivity as a personal property of students on the resistance to negative life situations. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. Seriya: Pedagogika i psihologiya: sbornik statej. Yalta, RIO GPA Publ., 2016. Vol. 7. Issue 52. Pp. 555-561. (In Russ.)

12. Zotova O. Yu. Socio-psychological security of personality: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the doctor of psychological sciences. Moscow, MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova Publ., 2011. 43 p. (In Russ.)

13. Kovyleva Yu. E. Building the educational environment of a modern school. Aktual'nye zadachi pedagogiki : materialy V Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Chita, Molodoj uchenyj Publ., 2014. Pp. 117-119. (In Russ.)

14. Kozyrev V. A. Theoretical foundations for the development of the humanitarian educational environment of the Pedagogical University: monograph. St. Petersburg, Russian State Pedagogical University im. A. I. Herzen Publ., 1999. 275 p. (In Russ.)

15. Korchak Ya. How to love a child. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990. 493 p. (In Russ.)

16. Krasnyanskaya T. M., Tylec V. G. The main trends in the formation and development of methods of safety psychology. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2022, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 10. (In Russ.)

17. Kryukova T. L. Psychology of coping behavior in different periods of life: the dissertation of the doctor of psychological sciences: 19. 00. 13. Kostroma, 2005. 473 p. (In Russ.)

18. Laptev A. A., Sorokoumova S. N., Yudin O. A. Psychological impact on the personality and its safety: problem setting. Psihologo-pedagogicheskij poisk, 2021, no. 4 (60), pp. 144-156, doi: 10.37724/RSU.2021.60.4.013. (In Russ.)

19. Panov V. I. Ecological psychology: Experience in constructing a methodology. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2004. 197 p. (In Russ.)

20. Psychology of security as a basis for humanitarian technologies in social interaction : scientific and methodological materials / ed. prof. I. A. Baeva. St. Petersburg, OOO «Knizhnyj Dom» Publ., 2008. 288 p. (In Russ.)

21. Psychology of communication and trust: theory and practice: collection of materials of the International Conference of URAO, PI RAO, Moscow State University. November 6-7, 2014 / ed. T. P. Skripkina. Moscow, Universitet RAO Publ., 2014. 777 p. (In Russ.)

22. Psychology of teacher's subjectivity / ed. E. N. Volkova. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhegorodskij gumanitarnyj centr Publ., 2001. P. 48. (In Russ.)

23. Rubcov V. V., Selyavina L. K., Malyh S. B. The system of psychological support for education. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 1999, no. 2, pp. 5-32. (In Russ.)

24. Skripkina T. P. Psychology of trust: a textbook for higher pedagogical educational institutions. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2000. 264 p. (In Russ.)

25. Slobodchikov V. N. Educational environment: implementation of the goals of education in the space of culture. Novye cennosti obrazovaniya: kul'turnye modeli shkol. Moscow, 1997. Pp. 177-184. (In Russ.)

26. Sorokoumova S. N., Dunaeva N. I. The study of the resistance of the personality of adolescents, high school students and students to difficult life situations. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2022, vol. 24, no. 6 (94), pp. 802-808. (In Russ.)

27. Hlomov K. D., Bochaver A. A., Korneev A. A. Coping strategies and the educational environment of adolescents. Social'naya psihologiya i obshchestvo, 2020, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 180-199, doi: 10.17759/sps.2020110211. (In Russ.)

28. Hmel'kova O. V. Adaptive readiness of students in a general educational dynamic educational environment: the author's abstract of the thesis of the candidate of psychological sciences. Saratov, 2021. 27 p. (In Russ.)

29. Chudnovskij V. E. Formation of personality and problems of the meaning of life. Izbrannye trudy. Moscow, Moskovskij psihologo-social'nyj institute Publ., Voronezh, NPO MODEK Publ., 2006. 768 p. (In Russ.)

30. Shchelina S. O. Coping behavior as a resource for the personal and professional development of psychology students (undergraduate and specialist degrees): the author's abstract of the thesis of the candidate of psychological sciences. Moscow, FGBNU «Psihologicheskij institut Rossijskoj akademii obrazovaniya» Publ., 2021. 27 p. (In Russ.)

31. Yanickij M. S., Seryj A. V. Basic methodological approaches to the study of the value-semantic sphere of personality. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstva, 2012, no. 19, p. 12. (In Russ.)

32. Yasvin V. A. Educational environment: from modeling to design. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2001. 365 p. (In Russ.)

33. Yasvin V. A. Training of pedagogical interaction in a creative educational environment. Moscow, 1997. Pp. 11-15. (In Russ.)

34. Nikonova E. I., Sharonov I. A., Sorokoumova S. N., Suvorova O. V., Sorokoumova E. A. Modern Functions of a Textbook on Social Sciences and Humanities as an Informational Management Tool of University Education // International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016. Vol. 11, no. 10. Pp. 3764-3774. Available at: http://www.ijese.net/makale/593 (accessed: 22. 12. 2022).

35. Rong Ju., Buldakova N. V., Sorokoumova S. N., Sergeeva M. G., Galushkin A. A., Soloviev A. A., Kryukova N. I. Foresight methods in pedagogical design of university learning environment // Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2017. Vol. 13, no. 8. Pp. 5281-5293.

36. Sorokoumova S. N., Efremova G. I., Timoshenko G. V., Leonenko E. A., Bochkovskaya I. A., Potekhina E. V. The Projective Study of The Impact of The Vertical Position of a Person on The Nosological Specificity of Psychosomatic Risk // Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2016. Vol. 7, no. 6. Pp. 685-691.


Review

Views: 454


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)