The manifestation of Christian attitudes in the anthropology of Marcus Aurelius
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2023-11-2-12
Abstract
Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the anthropological attitudes of Marcus Aurelius, formed as a result of the mutual influence of Roman Stoicism and early Christianity. The purpose of this work is to conduct a comparative analysis of the late Stoic and Christian axiology, ethics and demonstrate their relevance in the modern era of postmodernist value disorientation.
Materials and Methods. The material of the study is the writings of Marcus Aurelius, the New Testament canonical epistles, the works of Christian apologists of the first centuries, as well as the works of contemporary domestic and foreign authors devoted to the spiritual situation in the Roman Empire during the reign of Marcus Aurelius, the moral foundations of Roman stoicism; anthropological, ethical ideas of the ancient philosopher associated with Christian thought; the views of early Christian authors on the worldview of the emperor and Roman stoicism. The author relied on civilizational and dialectical approaches, used methods: hermeneutic, analytical, synthesis, generalization, reconstruction of philosophical views, comparative historical.
Results. As a result of the work done, it was found that the essentially Christian anthropological, axiological ideas of Marcus Aurelius (the essence of man, his path in history and posthumous fate, ethical constants) were formed as a result of a bilateral influence: stoicism on the formation of Christian doctrine in the I-II centuries, Christianity - on the worldview of the thinker. Being a persecutor of Christians, the philosopher on the throne unconsciously embodied the goals pursued by the young religion.
Discussion and Conclusions. The author managed to carry out a comparative analysis of the anthropology, ethics and axiology of Marcus Aurelius and early Christianity. The study convincingly showed that the demarcation between ancient pagan antiquity and medieval Christianity accepted in philosophical science is conditional. The chronological definition of these historical periods is also conditional. This interpenetration of eras is confirmed by the enormous influence of Roman stoicism on the formation of Christian apologetics, as well as the anthropological, ethical and axiological attitudes of the Roman Stoic Marcus Aurelius congenial to Christianity.
About the Author
O. V. ParilovRussian Federation
Parilov Oleg V. – Doctor of Philosophical Science, Professor
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Blazhennyj Avgustin. Creations: in 4 volumes. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, Aletejya Publ., Kyiv, UCIMM-Press Publ., 2000. 742 p. (In Russ.)
2. Gusejnov A., Irrlitc G. Brief history of ethics. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1987. 589 p. (In Russ.)
3. Kocherov S. N. Stoic optimism of Marcus Aurelius. ΣΧΟΛΗ, 2016, no. 10.2, pp. 559-570. (In Russ.)
4. Krank E. O. Marcus Aurelius: the formula of incarnation. Kul'turologiya, iskusstvovedenie i filologiya: ot teorii k praktike: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Cheboksary, CHuvashskij gosudarstvennyj institut kul'tury i iskusstv Ministerstva kul'tury, po delam nacional'nostej i arhivnogo dela CHuvashskoj Respubliki Publ., 2021. Pp. 57-70. (In Russ.)
5. Lebedev P. N. “Good” and “bad” Roman emperors in the early Christian apologetics of the 2nd century. Pamyat' i identichnost': osobennosti istoriopisaniya v Antichnosti, v Srednie veka i rannee Novoe vremya: sbornik statej po materialam mezhvuzovskoj nauchnoj konferencii / otv. redaktor P. N. Lebedev. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2019. Pp. 67-76. (In Russ.)
6. Lebedev P. N. “Noster est magis Caesar, a nostro deo constitutes”: the image of the emperor in Christian apologetic literature of the 2nd–3rd centuries. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul'turologiya. Vostokovedenie, 2017, no. 10-1 (31), pp. 31-39. (In Russ.)
7. Lebedev P. N. The Image of Marcus Aurelius in Early Christian Literature. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul'turologiya. Vostokovedenie», 2018, no. 10 (43), pp. 16-24. (In Russ.)
8. Losev A. F. Anniversary collected works: in 9 volumes. Vol. 9. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 2010. 703 p. (In Russ.)
9. Mazurin K. M. Tertullian and his creations. Moscow, Universitetskaya tipografiya Publ., 1892. 356 p. (In Russ.)
10. Mark Avrelij. Alone with yourself / trans. S. Rogovin. Moscow, M. i S. Sabashnikovy Publ., 1914. 199 p. (In Russ.)
11. Panteleev A. D. Lightning Legion: Christian legend and reality. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 2: Istoriya, 2007, no. 3, pp. 143-149. (In Russ.)
12. Pashchak I. V. Mark Avreliy: ethical, social and civic aspects of teaching. LXXI Mezhdunarodnye nauchnye chteniya (pamyati A. I. Notkina): sbornik statej Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Moscow, EFIR Publ., 2020. Pp. 49-55. (In Russ.)
13. Preobrazhenskij P. Early Church Fathers: An Anthology. Brussels, ZHizn' s Bogom Publ., 1988. 734 p. (In Russ.)
14. Prokop'ev S. M. The emergence of Christian historical thought: Origen of Alexandria. Moscow, MGUP Publ., 2010. 175 p. (In Russ.)
15. Renan E. Marcus Aurelius and the End of Antiquity. Moscow, Terra Publ., 1991. 347 p. (In Russ.)
16. Alston L. Stoic and Christian in the Second Century: A Comparison of the Ethical Teaching of Marcus Aurelius with That of Contemporary and Antecedent Christianity. London, Longmans, Green and Co., 1906. 146 р.
17. Anthony J. Guerra. The Conversion of Marcus Aurelius and Justin Martyr: The Purpose, Genre, and Content of the First Apology. Second Century, 1992, vol. 9.3, рр. 171-187.
18. Arnold E. V. Roman stoicism. London, Cambridge university press, 1911. 468 р. 19. Ball W. Rome in the East: The Transformation of an Empire. 2nd edition. London, Routledge, 2016. 594 р.
19. Bowman John L. A Reference Guide to Stoicism. Bloomington, IN, Author House, 2014. 220 р.
20. Buck P. L. Athenagoras’s Embassy. A Literary Fiction. Harvard Theological Review, 1996, vol. 89, pp. 209-226.
21. Burliga B. The emperor’s old clothes: Marcus Aurelius’ attitude towards the Christians again. Studia Elbląskie, 2011, vol. 12, рр. 149-168.
22. Cook J. G. Roman Attitudes Toward the Christians: From Claudius to Hadrian. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2010. 380 р.
23. Dodds E. R. Pagan and Christian in an age of anxiety: some aspects of religious experience from Marcus Aurelius to Constantine. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1965. 144 р.
24. Edwards M. Introduction: Apologetics in the Roman World. Apologetics in the Roman Empire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians / Ed. by M. Edwards, M. Goodman, S. Price. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999. 318 р.
25. Gamble H. Y. Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1995. 337 р.
26. Grant M. The Antonines: the Roman Empire in transition. London, Routledge, 2016. 252 р.
27. Grant R. M. Five Apologists and Marcus Aurelius. Vigiliae Christianae, 1988, vol. 42 (1), рр. 1-17.
28. Holiday R., Hanselman S. Marcus Aurelius the Philosopher King. Lives of the Stoics. New York, Portfolio/Penguin, 2020. 352 р.
29. Kannaday W. C. Apologetic Discourse and the Scribal Tradition. Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature, 2004. 274 р.
30. Keresztes P. Marcus Aurelius a Persecutor? Harvard Theological Review, 1968, vol. 61 (3), рр. 321-341.
31. Kovács P. Marcus Aurelius’ Rain Miracle and the Marcomannic Wars. Leiden/Boston, Brill, 2009. 301 р.
32. MacMullen R. Christianizing the Roman Empire (A.D. 100–400). New Haven, London, Yale University Press, 1984. 183 р.
33. Merrony M. The Plight of Rome in the Fifth Century AD. London, Routledge, 2017. 59 р.
34. Rhee H. Early Christian Literature: Christ and Culture in the Second and Third Centuries. The Apologies, Apocryphal Acts and Martyr Acts. London, New York, Routledge, 2005. 240 р.
35. Robertson D. How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius Archived 4 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine. New York, St. Martin's Press, 2019. 294 р.
36. Sage M. M. Eusebius and the Rain Miracle: Some Observations. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 1987, bd. 36, h. 1, pр. 96-113.
37. Ulrich J. Apologists and apologetics in the second century. In Defence of Christianity: Early Christian Apologists / Ed. by J. Engberg, A.-C. Jacobsen, J. Ulrich. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, 2014. P. 30.