Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

The problem of individualization of learning in the context of change of paradigm bases

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2023-11-2-1

Abstract

Introduction. The problem of individualization of education is one of the leading problems of modern pedagogy and psychology. The article proposes a new perspective of its comprehension: in the subjective projection and in the context of changing the paradigm bases.

Materials and Methods. In the process of scientific research, theoretical research methods were used: logical-subject and comparative analysis, interpretation, generalization, scientific theorization.

Results. In the subjective projection, the individualization of learning manifests itself as an opportunity, assimilating the content being studied, to understand its connection with one's own «I», to know oneself, i.e. subjectivization of the content and procedural aspects of learning. The difference between subjectivization and the subjectivized form of the studied content is shown. The measure of individualization of training is defined: 1) a narrow horizon of subjectivation: subjective reality is represented in a non-subjective way as a rationally autonomous subjectivity; 2) the limiting horizon of subjectification: subjective reality is presented in a subjective way; 3) autonomous subjectification or zero horizon of subjectification: subjective phenomena exist autonomously, without expressing the meaning of the content being studied. It is shown that the measure of individualization as a systemic property is determined by the accepted method of structured knowledge, included the content of education (classical, post-non-classical structuring of knowledge). This method is predetermined by the paradigm foundations of the learning system. The measure of individualization of learning in the article is considered in the context of the classical, non-classical, post-non-classical paradigm.

Discussion and Conclusions. The conclusions proposed in the article are aimed at solving practical issues related to the design of psychological and pedagogical tools for individualizing learning and evaluating their educational effectiveness.

About the Author

I. A. Leskova
Volgograd State Social and Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Leskova Inna A. – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor

Volgograd

ResearcherID: L-8435-2018



References

1. Dubrovskij D. I. On the question of the relationship between the concepts of “knowledge” and “ignorance”. Znanie kak predmet epistemologii / otv. red. V. A. Lektorskij. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 2011. Pp. 26-46. (In Russ.)

2. Dubrovskij D. I. The concept of subjective reality. Basic theoretical questions. Filosofskaya antropologiya, 2018, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 186-217. (In Russ.)

3. ZHurakovskij G. E. Essays on the history of ancient pedagogy. Moscow, Uchpedgiz Publ., 1940. 471 p. (In Russ.)

4. Kemerov V. E. Types of philosophizing: classical, non-classical, post-classica. Gumanitarnyj portal. Available at: https://gtmarket.ru/concepts/7062 (accessed: 02.03.2023). (In Russ.)

5. Kirsanov A.A. Individualization of educational activity as a pedagogical problem. Kazan, Kazan University Press, 1982. 224 p. (In Russ.)

6. Kovaleva T.M. Human dimension as a possible criterion for educational practice. CHelovekorazmernoe obrazovanie: problemy pedagogicheskih praktik v Rossii i stranah Aziatsko-Tihookeanskogo regiona: sbornik materialov vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, 17 dekabrya 2015 g. Vladivostok, Dal'nevostochnyj federal'nyj universitet Publ., 2016. Pp. 9-12. Available at: http://uss.dvfu.ru/e-publications/2016/chelovekorazmernoe-obrazovanie-mater-konf.pdf (accessed: 02.03.2023). (In Russ.)

7. Konev V. A. Anthropological turn / turn of culture – a new version of the modern project. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul'tury, 2014, no. 2 (15), pp. 5-11. (In Russ.)

8. Lebedev S. A. Three epistemological paradigms: classical, non-classical and post-non-classical. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki, 2019, no. 2, pp. 8-21, doi: 10.18384/2310-7227-2019-2-8-21. (In Russ.)

9. Leskova I. A. Subject-centered approach to the construction of the content of higher education: the dissertation of the doctor of pedagogical sciences. Moscow, 2019. 437 p. (In Russ.)

10. Nesyna S. V. Structural and meaningful characteristics of individuality. YAroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 2019, no. 5 (110), pp. 25-31, doi: 10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10518. (In Russ.)

11. Pedagogical encyclopedia: in 4 volumes / Chief Editor I. A. Kairov [et al.]. Vol. 2. Moscow, 1965. (In Russ.)

12. Rubinshtejn S. L. Being and Consciousness. Man and the world. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2003. 512 p. (In Russ.)

13. Slobodchikov V. I. Development of subjective reality in ontogeny (psychological foundations of education design): the author's abstract of the dissertation of the doctor of psychological sciences. Moscow, 1994. 78 p. (In Russ.)

14. Unt I. E. Individualization and differentiation of education. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1990. 192 p. (In Russ.)

15. Frenk D. Dzh., Majer Dzh. The expansion of universities and the knowledge society. Koncepciya «obshchestva znaniya» v sovremennoj social'noj teorii: sbornik nauchnyh trudov / otv. red. D. V. Efremenko. Moscow, 2010. Pp. 213-218. (Theory and history of sociology). (In Russ.)

16.


Review

Views: 632


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)