Reflexive-personalized model formation of pedagogical position "mentor for development
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-4-12
Abstract
Introduction. The methodology of personalized adult education and effective management of the process of reflexive training of "age-appropriate professionals" require from a modern manager of all levels the ability to think in a new way, actually abandoning the established stereotypes of thinking and overcoming the inertia of past experience of professional activity. In this regard, the question of designing a personalized system for the formation of a new professional position "mentor for development", aimed at mastering the mechanisms of reflexive management of educational activities by a teacher, at developing the ability to enter professional communities, to reflect on their own activities and on this conceptual and methodological basis to build and implement fundamentally new professional standards, becomes relevant.-professional activity with the irreversibility of reaching a new level of professional development.
Aim. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the general idea of the unique essence of a modern teacher to become and be a professional, able to set the semantic space of "growing human in a person" by means of his profession and to reveal the conditions and reflexive mechanisms for the formation of a new professional position of a mentor for development.
Materials and Methods. The basis of creative search and an effective means of professional development of teachers in a personalized model of education is reflexive management, in which three basic functions of reflection are distinguished: an organizational function associated with the construction of corporate training, organizations of collective activity of participants in innovative educational events; a developing function aimed at the formation of positionality and reflexivity, which guarantee the possibility of constructing new author's samples and a way of activity with the presence of the ability to change oneself and manage one's activities. The reflexive-activity approach and expert-project methodology serve as a methodological basis for the formation of a mentor for development, incorporating techniques and methods for constructing conceptual schemes of a continuous process of synthesizing and methodological reflection as a teacher's complex thinking ability to constantly critically analyze and evaluate each step of the implementation of a productive action during the decision tasks of.
Results. A reflexive-personalized model of the position of a mentor for development at a pedagogical university, a methodology for organizing and diagnosing synthesizing reflection in personalized teaching of teachers have been developed, the functions of reflection at the stages of solving managerial problems in the context of organizing a federal innovation platform of the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of the Russian Federation “Network project of training the mentor for development”, which made it possible to determine the criteria for building the practice of mentoring in educational organizations - co-executors of the network project, have been defined and highlighted.
Discussion and Conclusion. The scientific novelty of the results and educational products is determined by the development of a set of conditions and reflexive mechanisms for the formation of a professional position of a mentor for development, in whose professional activity the productive and concrete embodiment of the key principle in a specific place "here and now" is revealed - orientation to the personalization of the educational process based on the use of digital technologies and the integration of advanced achievements psychological and pedagogical science and innovative experience of pedagogical activity. The embodiment of this concretization in the conditions of a reflexively personalized model does not reduce the semantic essence of the scientific work being carried out, but on the contrary, productive and effective practice of mentoring activities can be presented and reflected as a whole, coinciding and adequate in terms of meanings, strategic goals and methods of advancing continuous pedagogical education.
About the Authors
G. A. IgnatievaRussian Federation
Galina A. Ignatieva, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Laboratory
Design and Network Laboratory of Advanced Adult Education
Nizhny Novgorod
A. V. Grishina
Russian Federation
Anna V. Grishina, Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department
Department of Scientific Research
Nizhny Novgorod
E. K. Samerkhanova
Russian Federation
Elvira K. Samerkhanova, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, First Vice-Rector
Nizhny Novgorod
O. V. Tulupova
Russian Federation
Oksana V. Tulupova, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Director of the Center
Federal Center for Scientific and Methodological Support of Pedagogical Workers
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Avilov A. V. Reflexive control. Methodological foundations: monograph. Moscow, 2003. 174 p. (In Russ.)
2. Alekseev N. G. Designing conditions for the development of reflexive thinking: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the doctor of psychological sciences. Moscow, MPGU Publ., 2002. 51 p. (In Russ.)
3. Alekseev N. G. Project approach to the formation of reflexive thinking in education and management. Refleksivno-organizacionnye problemy formirovaniya myshleniya i lichnosti v obrazovanii i upravlenii: sbornik statej / otv. red.-sost. I. N. Semenov, T. G. Boldina. Moscow, IRPTIGO Publ., 2003. Pp. 51-65. (In Russ.)
4. Asmolov A. G. Psychology of modernity: challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, no. 8 (40), doi: 10.54359/ps.v8i40.550. (In Russ.)
5. Belbin R. Teams of managers. Secrets of success and causes of failure: translation from English. Moscow, HIPPO Publ., 2003. 315 p. (In Russ.)
6. Gazman O. S. Pedagogy of freedom: the path to the humanistic civilization of the XXI century. Novye cennosti obrazovaniya, 1996, vol. 6, pp. 10-37. (In Russ.)
7. Gargaj V. B., Kurakbaev K. S. Reflexive Pedagogy as a Way of Composing and Developing a Teacher’s Professional Competence (Based on Foreign Experience). Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal, 2009, no. 7, pp. 343-356. (In Russ.)
8. Gargaj V. G. Improving the qualifications of teachers in the West: a reflexive model of teaching. Pedagogika, 2004, no. 2, pp. 72-79. (In Russ.)
9. Gordeeva N. D., Zinchenko V. P. The role of reflection in the construction of objective action. Chelovek, 2001, no. 6, pp. 26-41. (In Russ.)
10. Gromyko Yu. V. Personalization in education: initiating education, the rise of consciousness and personal growth. L. S. Vygotskij – P. A. Florenskij: nesostoyavshijsya dialog. Priglashenie k dialogu. Moscow, 2007. Pp. 52-97. (In Russ.)
11. Gromyko Yu. V. The Russian education system today: a decisive factor in development or a path to the abyss? Education as a political technology. Moscow, LENAND Publ., 2019. 368 p. (In Russ.)
12. Davydov V. V. Theory of developmental education. Moscow, INTOR Publ., 1996. 544 p. (In Russ.)
13. Davydov V. V., Neverkovich S. D., Samoukina N. V. On the functions of reflection in the game training of managers. Voprosy psikhologii, 1990, no. 3, pp. 76-84. (In Russ.)
14. Ermakov S. S. Modern technologies of e-learning: analysis of the influence of gamification methods on the involvement of students in the educational process. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya, 2020, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 47-58, doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2020090304. (In Russ.)
15. Ignat'eva G. A., Tulupova O. V. Innovative technological format of additional professional education of teachers. Pedagogika i prosveshchenie, 2015, no. 4, pp. 359-372. (In Russ.)
16. Ignat'eva G. A., Tulupova O. V. Competence model of a mentor: an assembly tool. Scientific and methodological recommendations for the development of training programs for mentors in the field of continuing education. Nizhny Novgorod, Mininskij universitet Publ., 2021. 48 p. (In Russ.)
17. Ignat'eva G. A., Tulupova O. V. Project-resource management of innovations in education: nauchnyj zhurnal), 2015, no. 5. Available at: http://journal-s.org/index.php/sisp/article/view/6256 (accessed: 22. 07. 2022). (In Russ.)
18. Ignat'eva G. A., Sdobnyakov V. V., Tulupova O. V. Practical andragogy: a model of adult education and self-education. Methodical navigator: teaching aid. Nizhny Novgorod, Mininskij universitet Publ., 2022. 54 p. (In Russ.)
19. Isaev E. I., Slobodchikov V. I. Fundamentals of psychological anthropology. Human psychology: an introduction to the psychology of subjectivity: textbook for students of higher pedagogical educational institutions. Moscow, Shkola-press Publ., 1995. 383 p. (In Russ.)
20. Isaev E. I., Slobodchikov V. I. Psychology of human education: the formation of subjectivity in educational processes: a textbook. Moscow, PSTGU Publ., 2013. 432 p. (In Russ.)
21. Karpov A. V. Psychology of the reflexive mechanism of activity: monograph. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Publ., 2004. 424 p. (In Russ.)
22. Klarin M. V. A tool for innovative education: organizational and activity pedagogy. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek, 2016, no. 1 (13), pp. 1-18. (In Russ.)
23. Knyazeva E. N. Transdisciplinary research strategies. Vestnik TGPU, 2011, no. 10, pp. 193-201. (In Russ.)
24. Korneli Dzh., Danoff Dzh. Ch. Paragogy: synergy of independent and organized learning activities. Problemy upravleniya v social'nykh sistemakh, 2014, no. 11, pp. 84-97. (In Russ.)
25. Lazarev V. S. The crisis of the “activity approach” in psychology and possible ways to overcome it. Voprosy filosofii, 2001, no. 3, pp. 33-48. (In Russ.)
26. Lefevr V. A. Reflection. Moscow, Kogito-Centr Publ., 2003. 496 p. (In Russ.)
27. Mamardashvili M. K. A possible person. Moscow, Ripol-Klassik Publ., 2019. 495 p. (Series: Figures of Philosophy). (In Russ.)
28. Mokij V. S., Luk'yanova T. A. Transdisciplinarity: stereotypes, approaches and directions. Universum: obshchestvennye nauki: ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal, 2021, no. 3 (72), doi: 10.32743/UniSoc.2021.72-3.7-19. (In Russ.)
29. National Doctrine of Education of the Russian Federation. Project / edited by corresponding member of RAO V. I. Slobodchikov. Ed. 2nd, corrected and supplemented. Moscow, 2022. 34 p. Available at: https://rnk-concept.ru/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/777-2022_Doktrina.pdf (accessed: 22. 07. 2022). (In Russ.)
30. Popov A. A., Proskurovskaya I. D. Pedagogical anthropology in the context of the idea of self-determination. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2007, no. 3, pp. 186-198. (In Russ.)
31. Rozin V. M., Kovaleva T. M. Personalization or individualization: psichologo-anthropological or cultural-environmental approaches. Pedagogika, 2020, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 18-28. (In Russ.)
32. Ryabcev V. K., Zverev S. M., Ryashina V. V. Reflexive consciousness of a teacher as a way to manage professional activities. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 2018, no. 4, pp. 223-229. (In Russ.)
33. Samerkhanova Eh. K., Krupoderova E. P., Panova I. V. Digital resources for organizing the educational process and assessing the achievements of students in a distance format: a review of digital resources for distance education. Nizhny Novgorod, Mininskij universitet Publ., 2020. 50 p. (In Russ.)
34. Sdobnyakov V. V. Federal scientific and methodological center as a regional institution for the formation of a personal trajectory of a teacher's professional development. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 2021, no. 12-3 (63), pp. 205-209, doi: 10.24412/2500-1000-2021-12-3-205-209. (In Russ.)
35. Sdobnyakov V. V., Ignat'eva G. A., Tulupova O. V., Sotkina S. A., Moiseenko A. V. Network project for training development mentors. Practice-oriented monograph. Nizhny Novgorod, Mininskij universitet Publ., 2022. 64 p. (In Russ.)
36. Senge P. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of a learning organization: translation from English. Moscow, ZAO «Olimp-BizneS» Publ., 2003. 408 p. (In Russ.)
37. Sitnikov A. P. Acmeological training: Theory, methodology, psychotechnologies. Moscow, Tekhnologicheskaya shkola biznesa Publ., 1996. 428 p. (In Russ.)
38. Slobodchikov V. I. Anthropological perspective of national education. Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Publishing Department of the Yekaterinburg diocese, 2009. 264 p. (In Russ.)
39. Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation / ed. A. Yu. Uvarov and I. D. Frumin. Moscow, Izdatel'skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki Publ., 2019. 344 p. Pp. 205-214. (In Russ.)
40. Shchedrovickij G. P. Reflection in activity. Voprosy metodologii, 1994, no. 3-4, pp. 76-121. (In Russ.)
41. Ehl'konin D. B. Selected psychological works. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnaya pedagogicheskaya akademiya Publ., 1995. 554 p. (In Russ.)
42. Yakushkina M. S., Ilakavichus M. R. Methods and forms of self-organization of communities of different ages in event networks of non-formal education. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2021, no. 2 (214), pp. 125-133. (In Russ.)
43. Brown K. W., Ryan R. M. The Benefits of Being Present: Mindfulness and Its Role in Psychological WellBeing // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003. Vol. 84, no. 4. Рp. 822-848.
44. Burhan-Horasanlı E., Ortaçtepe D. Reflective practice-oriented online discussions: A study on EFL teachers’ re-flection-on, in and for-action // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016. Vol. 59. Pp. 372-382. URL: http://yoksis.bilkent.edu.tr/pdf/files/12733.pdf.
45. Farrell T. S. Reflective Language Teaching: From Research to Practice. 2008. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Reflective-Language-Teaching%3A-From-Research-to-Farrell/ba3737b205a6ee10abce46ec64ba5ae1edb41a2a (accessed: 25. 07. 2022).
46. Florez M. A. C. Reflective Teaching Practice in Adult ESL Settings. ERIC Digest. ED451733 2001-03-00. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED451733.pdf (accessed: 25. 07. 2022).
47. Kang S. Teacher Reflection Research and Its Implications for Physical Education // Teacher Education Japanese Journal of Sport Education Studies. 2003. Vol. 23, no. 1. Pp. 77-88. doi: 10.7219/jjses.23.77.
48. Kenyon C., Hase St. Moving from andragogy to heutagogy in vocational education // Research to Reality: Putting VET Research To Work. Proceedings of the Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA) Conference (4th, Adelaide, Australia, March 28-30, 2001). Available at: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/131098 (accessed: 25. 07. 2022).
49. Knowles M., Holton E. F., Swanson R. A. The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. 9th ed. London: Routledge, 2020. 406 p.
50. Malmir A. Teachers’ Reflective Teaching and Self-Efficacy as Predicators of their Professional Success: A Case of Iranian EFL // Teachers Research in English Language Pedagogy. 2018. Vol. 6 (1). Рp. 117-138.
51. Mathew P., Mathew Pr., Peechattu P. J. Reflective practices: a means to teacher development // Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology (APJCECT). 2017. Vol. 3, no. 1. Рp. 126-131. Available at: https://apiar.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/13_APJCECT_Feb_BRR798_EDU-126-131.pdf (accessed: 25. 07. 2022).
52. Minott M. A. Valli’s Typology of Reflection and the Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Reflective Journals // Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2008. Vol. 33, no. 5. Article 4. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2008v33n5.4.
53. Olmos-Vega F. M, Stalmeijer R., Kahlke R. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149 // Medical Teacher. 2022. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
54. Schon D. A. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1999. 234 p.
55. Shon D. A. The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books, 1983. 380 р.
56. Wallace M. J. Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press, 1998. 273 р.