The nature and essence of interpersonal relations between the subjects of pedagogical activity

   Introduction. The study provides an analysis of modern theoretical research and approaches to the definition of the concept of "interpersonal relationships". The article reveals the nature of interpersonal relations, the relationship between the teacher and the student, their nature of mutual influence on each other. On the basis of theoretical analysis, ideas are formed about the system of interpersonal relations, its components, the specifics of building in the pedagogical process. The main attention is paid to interpersonal relations between the teacher and the student, which act as one of the main factors forming behavioral motives, communication skills, emotional culture of the individual and setting a vector in the development of cognitive interests of the student.methods of information transmission, the nature of interaction, which is the key to building a quality educational process.
   Materials and Methods. The article uses the following methods: analysis of normative documents; analysis of the current state of the problem in scientific literature and practice; study of pedagogical experience; generalization.
   Results. Theoretical studies and educational practice confirm that the non-constructive interaction of subjects of pedagogical activity contributes to the formation of low knowledge indicators in the student, lack of motivation to learn, the emergence of conflicts, difficulty in communication and
hinder the full development of the child's personality. Constructive, humanistic relations between the teacher and the student are a key factor in the successful solution of pedagogical tasks. Interpersonal relations of the subjects of the pedagogical process are mutually influencing, are the starting point in creating a favorable psychological climate in the group, satisfaction with the work process and contribute to achieving a positive result of joint activities.
   Discussion and Conclusions. The conclusion reveals the role of the teacher as a leading figure building interpersonal relationships with the student, and these relationships occur in a complex system of interaction between student and teacher, students among themselves, family and school, teacher and teacher, who also influence educational and pedagogical interaction. The study of relations and interaction within the pedagogical dyad "teacher – student", the problems around which their main communications are formed, is based on the analysis of classical and modern scientific theories, the formulation of conceptual apparatus, the definition of forms of interaction, methods of information transmission, the nature of interaction, which is the key to building a quality educational process.

1. Buhtiyarova I. N. Interpersonal relations between children and parents: theoretical and methodological analysis. Obshchestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika , 2019, no. 3, pp. 76-80. (In Russ.)

2. Grigor'eva M. V. Interaction as a category of modern psychology. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psihologiya razvitiya, 2009, no. 3-4, pp. 3-13. (In Russ.)

3. Dolganov D. N. The structure of the system of interpersonal relations. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya, 2017, no. 1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/struktura-sistemy-mezhlichnostnyh-otnosheniy (accessed: 08. 06. 2022). (In Russ.)

4. Elfimova N. V. Study of deformations of interpersonal interaction in the system "Student teacher". Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 2011, no. 3, pp. 89-92. (In Russ.)

5. Elfimova N. V. Interpersonal interaction in the educational environment. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2009, no. 3, pp. 66-72. (In Russ.)

6. Zhuravleva Yu. A. Some features of interpersonal relations of the subjects of the pedagogical process. Vestnik Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta , 2017, no. 3 (46), pp. 51-56. (In Russ.)

7. Makarova T. V. Harmonization of interpersonal relations between the subjects of the educational process. Nauchnyj forum: Pedagogika i psihologiya: sbornik statej po materialam XII Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya. no. 10 (12) . Moscow, MCNO Publ., 2017. Pp. 12-17. (In Russ.)

8. Moskalenko A. V. Influence of pedagogical interaction on the subjective position of students. MNKO, 2011, no. 2, pp. 219-220. (In Russ.)

9. Petrova T. N., Muhtarova SH. M. Formation of the ethnic component in the content of higher pedagogical education: theory and practice. Vestnik CHGPU imeni I. Ya. Yakovleva, 2015, no. 3 (87), pp. 170-176. (In Russ.)

10. Polyakova A. V. The concept of interpersonal interaction in the social and educational environment. Problemy pedagogiki, 2017, no. 9 (32), pp. 25-27. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-mezhlichnostnogo-vzaimodeystviya-v-sotsialno-obrazovatelnoy-srede (accessed: 16. 06. 2022). (In Russ.)

11. Radionova N. F., Rivkina S. V. The problem of teacher-student relations in pedagogical science: the history of the issue. Uchenye zapiski OGU. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i social'nye nauki, 2014, no. 5, pp. 376-381. (In Russ.)

12. Semenova T. S. Relations "student – teacher". Social'naya pedagogika, 2014, no. 5, pp. 97-103. (In Russ.)

13. Sobkin V. S., Fomichenko A. S. Influence of the relationship between the teacher and the student on the academic achievements of students. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriya i praktika, 2015, no. 3 (19), pp. 34-53. (In Russ.)

14. Suhomlinskij V. A. One Hundred Tips for a Teacher. Izhevsk, Udmurtiya Publ., 1981. 296 p. (In Russ.)

15. Hutorskoj A. V. The theory of elementary education I. G. Pestalozzi. SHkol'nye tekhnologii, 2010, no. 2, pp. 78-82. (In Russ.)

16. Amirkhan J. N. A Facior Analytically Derived Measure of Coping: the Strategy Indicator // Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. Vol. 59. Pp. 1066-1074.

17. Bem S. The measurement of psychological androgyny // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1974. Vol. 42, no, 2. Pp. 155-162.

18. Britt J. E. Teacher-student relationships and student achievement in grades six and seven mathematics. VA, Lynchburg: Liberty University, 2013. 287 p.

19. Bronfenbrenner U., Morris P. A. The ecology of developmental processes // Damon W., Lerner R. M. (eds.) Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1998. Pp. 993-1028.

20. Buhrmester D., Furman W. The development of companionship and intimacy // Child Development. 1987. Vol. 58 (4). Pp. 1101-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01444.x.

21. Bain A. Education as a Science. London: Longmans, 1881.

22. Carles S. A., de Paola С. The measurement of cohesion in work teams // Small Group Research. 2000. Vol. 31, no. 1. Pp. 18-71.

23. Carron A. V., Brawley L. R. Cohesion // Small Group Research. 2000. Vol 31, no. 1. Pp. 89-90.

24. Ferre E.R., Lopez C., Haggard P. Anchoring the Self to the Body: Vestibular Contribution to the Sense of Self // Psychological Science. 2014. Vol. 25, no. 11. Pp. 2106-2108. doi: 10.1177/0956797614547917.

25. Gutsu E. G., Demeneva N. N., Kochetova E. V., Mayasova T. V., Belinova N. V. Studying motivational-axiological component of professional competence of a college teacher // International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016. Vol. 11, no. 18. Pp. 12650-12657.

26. Hillis A. E. Inability to Empathize: Brain Lesions That Disrupt Sharing and Understanding Another’s Emotions // Brain. 2014. Vol. 137, no. 4. Pp. 981-987. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt317.

27. Szasz T. S., Hollender M. H. A Contribution to the Philosophy of medicine // JAMA Internet Medicine. 1956. Vol. 97 (5). Pp. 585-592. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1956.00250230079008.

28. Fan W., Williams C. M. The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation // Educational Psychology. 2010. Vol. 30 (1). Pp. 53-74.

29. Knaak S., Mantler E., Szeto A. Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare Barriers to access and care and evidence-based solutions // Healthc Manage Forum. 2017. Vol. 30, no. 2. Pp. 111-116. doi: 10.1177/0840470416679413.

30. Rey R. B., Smith A. L., Yoon J., Somers C., Barnett D. Relationships between teachers and urban African American children: the role of informant // School Psychology International. 2007. Vol. 28. Pp. 346-364.