Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

From the practice of using clinical interviews in the study of mentality

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-3-14

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of the study is due to the depth and breadth of the concept of "mentality" in psychology. Based on this, the empirical study of mentality presents certain difficulties. In our study, we proceed from the understanding that mentality is a superstructure that determines the existential meaning of phenomena, processes that distinguish the psychological makeup of a particular society. The research is aimed at studying the yakut mentality through the prism of family relations. It is assumed that the family, as the primary institution of socialization, is the most important mechanism ensuring the continuity of traditional cultural values and the stability of mentality in a changing world.

Materials and Methods. The article describes the results of a clinical interview conducted within the framework of psychological counseling. The advantages of a clinical interview in the study of the deep, qualitative features of the mentality of the people are revealed. The study was conducted in Yakutia from 2018 to 2021. The sample size is 99 people. The age of respondents is from 54 to 82 years. Of these, 87 are women, 12 are men.

Results. The results of psychological consultations are presented in the form of detailed texts and tables reflecting the quantitative results of content analysis. Clinical interview protocols are analyzed using microsemantic analysis and content analysis.

Discussion and Conclusions. It is revealed that the traditional values of the sakha people are preserved in the yakut mentality: respect for elders, family as an extended family. Modern yakut families adhere to the norms of the traditional yakut family: child-centrism, parenting in the children's system, the active participation of grandparents in the upbringing of children, the choice of an informal head of the family not by gender, but by personal characteristics. The participation of several generations in the upbringing of children, the expansion of family resources at the expense of the genus are mechanisms that ensure the continuity of mentality in the yakut culture.

About the Author

N. D. Eliseeva
Institute of psychology NEFU
Russian Federation

Eliseeva Natalia D. – Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Institute of psychology The North-Eastern federal university by M. K. Ammosov, Yakutsk; doctoral student Institute of psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow



References

1. Akopov G.V., Davydkina L.V., Semenova T.V. Mentality as a group consciousness. Samara, PGSGA Publ., 2015. 76 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bendrikova A.YU. Intergenerational interaction as a way of broadcasting social values. Sem'ya v XXI veke: problemy i perspektivy: sbornik statej po materialam Vserossijskoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferencii / pod red. T.G. Sobolevoj. Barnaul, IP Kolmogorov I.A. Publ., 2017. Pp. 152-156. (In Russ.)

3. Bodalev A.A. Psychology of communication. Moscow, Kogito centr Publ., 2011. 600 p. (In Russ.)

4. Brushlinskij A.V. Thinking and forecasting. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1979. 230 p. (In Russ.)

5. Burina E.A., Kudinova A.E. Features of the modern Russian family in the context of sociohistorical changes in the institution of parenthood. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2020, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6. (In Russ.)

6. Volovikova M.I. Russian ideas about the moral ideal. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2004. 312 p. (In Russ.)

7. Gucykova S.V. Problem field of professional mentality and mentality of the subject of labor. Institut psihologii RAN. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya truda, 2019, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 153-170. (In Russ.)

8. Grigor'eva A.A. Theory and practice of family ethnopedagogy of the Sakha people: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the doctor of pedagogical sciences. Moscow, Institut pedagogiki social'noj raboty RAO Publ., 1999. 32 p. (In Russ.)

9. Grineva S.V. Mentality and mentality of modern Russia. Nevinnomyssk, Nevinnomysskij TI Publ., 2003. 177 p. (In Russ.)

10. Druzhinin V.N. Family psychology. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2006. 176 p. (In Russ.)

11. Kol'cova V.A. Russian mentality as a subject of socio-psychological research. Istoriogenez i sovremennoe sostoyanie rossijskogo mentaliteta / pod red. V.A. Kol'cova, E.V. Haritonova. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2015. Pp. 5-18. (In Russ.)

12. Kol'cova V.A., ZHuravlev A.L. Essence characteristics and factors of formation of the Russian mentality. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2017, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 5-17, doi: 10.7868/S0205959217030011. (In Russ.)

13. Korolenko A.V., Kalachikova O.N. Reproductive attitudes of young families: factors and conditions for implementation (based on in-depth interviews). Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz, 2022, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 172-189, doi: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.11. (In Russ.)

14. Lancburg M.E. The role of psychological training and support in the implementation of parental functions. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2011, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15-26. (In Russ.)

15. Lebedeva N.M. Introduction to ethnic and cross-cultural psychology. Moscow, Klyuch-S Publ., 1999. 224 p. (In Russ.)

16. Lomov B.F. Mental regulation of activity. Moscow, Kogito centr Publ., 2006. 780 p. (In Russ.)

17. Mid M. Culture and the world of childhood. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 430 p. (In Russ.)

18. Piazhe ZH. Psychology of intelligence. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2003, 192 p. (In Russ.)

19. Repina N.V., Voroncov D.V., YUmatova I.I. Fundamentals of clinical psychology. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2003. 480 p. (In Russ.)

20. Samsonova M.O., Ustimenko A.A. Distribution of responsibilities in the family: a comparative analysis of families of two generations. Studencheskij, 2022, No. 1-4(171), pp. 45-53. (In Russ.)

21. Satir V. Psychotherapy of the family. Moscow, Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij Publ., 2018. 218 p. (In Russ.)

22. Selyugina P.B. The internal image of the ancestors in the structure of personal identity: the author's abstract of the thesis of the candidate of psychological sciences. Moscow, FGAOU VPO Nacional'nyj issledovatel'skij universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki» Publ., 2013. 27 p. (In Russ.)

23. Semyonov V.E. Typology of Russian mentalities and the immanent ideology of Russia. Social'naya psihologiya v trudah otechestvennyh psihologov: hrestomatiya. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000. Pp. 485-492. (In Russ.)

24. Stefanenko T.G. Ethnopsychology. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., «Akademicheskij proekt» Publ., 1999. 320 p. (In Russ.)

25. Tomgorova G.U. Socio-psychological concept of family roles in complete and incomplete extended families. Obshchestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika, 2022, no. 2, pp. 137-143, doi: https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2022.2.19. (In Russ.)

26. Ushakov D.V. Mentality and socio-economic achievements of countries. Vestnik RAN, 2020, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 224-231, doi: 10.31857/S086958732003024X. (In Russ.)

27. Haritonova E.V. Correlation between the concepts of "mentality" and "mentality". Istoriogenez i sovremennoe sostoyanie rossijskogo mentaliteta / pod red. V.A. Kol'cova, E.V. Haritonova. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2015. Pp. 226-237. (In Russ.)

28. The number of divorces per year. Official statistics. Available at: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/31604 (accessed: 28.06.2022). (In Russ.)

29. Number of marriages per year. Official statistics. Available at: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/31604 (accessed: 28.06.2022). (In Russ.)

30. SHCHukina E.G. Psychological and pedagogical support of the family: assistance to parents raising children in the family. Innovacii. Nauka. Obrazovanie, 2021, no. 25, pp. 417-421. (In Russ.)

31. Ejdemiller E.G., YUstickis V.V. Psychology and psychotherapy of the family. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002. 656 p. (In Russ.)

32. Erikson M., Hejli Dzh. Family therapy strategy. Moscow, Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij Publ., 2001. 448 p. (In Russ.)

33. YUrevich A.V. Basic components of the national mentality. Vestnik RAN, 2013, no. 83(12), pp. 1083-1091. (In Russ.)

34. Bowen M. Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, 1978. 565 p.

35. Ejinkeonye U.B. Communication in the family implication for healthy family relationship. Journal of Home Economics, 2011, vol. 14, pp. 204-211.

36. Harrison V. Contributions of nuclear family triangles to variation in physiological reactivity in family systems. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 2013, vol. 9(2), pp. 145-153.

37. Len A.A., Torkunova O.I., Filonenko L.V. Research of sociocultural family value in the consciousness of military university cadets. Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University, 2021, no. 1(53), рр. 18-23, doi: 10.36906/2311-4444/21-1/03.

38. Minuchin S. Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1974. 45 р.

39. Stepanenko E.V., Satraeva J.A. Language interpretation of the picture of the world through the concept of “mentality”. Science and reality, 2020, no. 1, pp. 30-33.

40. Fun Yi., Lin Q. Putting families at the center: the role of family system in employee work-family conflict and voice behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09828-w.


Review

Views: 369


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)