Technogenic ideal in digital culture: building a research model

Introduction.In the context of the development of digitalization processes in all spheres of public life, high technologies generate technical objects and systems capable of independent development and existence, a new structural element of the cultural ideal is formed – technogenic. In the literature, the technogenic ideal is most often considered as an element of a social or anthropological ideal in the cultural system. Due to the fact that the technogenic ideal enters into contradictory relations with the anthropological and social component of the cultural ideal, there is a need to build a model for studying the laws of its development and existence.

Materials and Methods.In the course of the research, the methods of analytical review of scientific literature, comparison, analysis, the method of dialectics and its principles, the structural and functional approach were used.

Results.The conducted research has shown that the most urgent issues in the study of the cultural ideal of modern society are the problems caused by the introduction of new technical forms of subjectivity into public relations. There are particularly acute discussions about the role and consequences of human interaction with them, which can lead to both its improvement and destruction.

Discussion and Conclusions.As a result of the conducted research, the author substantiates the possibility of constructing a model for studying the technogenic ideal at two main levels. The first level will allow determining the nature, essence and forms of being of the technogenic ideal in the digital culture system from the position of philosophical and cultural knowledge: ontology, epistemology, axiology and praxiology. The next level in the proposed model is the structure of the cultural ideal, where the main elements are represented as an anthropological, social and technogenic ideal. This model allows us to build a methodology and logic for the study of the technogenic ideal based on the study of the theoretical foundations (ontological, epistemological, axiological and praxiological aspects) and the structural and functional foundations (typological and functional analysis) of this phenomenon in the digital culture system. This approach will make it possible to systematize and deepen the existing knowledge about the role and place of the technogenic ideal in the system of digital culture, to reveal the patterns and principles of its further evolution.

1. Bel'chevichen S.P., Rybachuk V.B. Social ideal in the philosophy of history of V. Solovyov and D. Merezhkovsky. VestnikTverskogogosudarstvennogouniversiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya, 2018, no. 1, pp. 179-190. (In Russ.)

2. Gavrikov D.S., Norenkov S.V. Natural ideals of tectonics for architectural objects. Klimatipriroda, 2019, no. 3(32), pp. 26-32. (In Russ.)

3. Gryaznova E.V., Hlap A.A. On the issue of the concept of "cultural ideal". Innovacionnayaekonomika: perspektivyrazvitiyaisovershenstvovaniya, 2019, no. 5(39), pp. 32-37. (In Russ.)

4. Gryaznova E.V., Afanas'ev S.V., Hlap A.A. "Information culture" and "psychological virtual reality" as categories of the information concept of virtual reality. CHelovekikul'tura, 2018, no. 6, pp. 83-92. (In Russ.)

5. Gryaznova E.V. Social memory as an element of culture. CHelovekikul'tura, 2015, no. 5, pp. 92-106. (In Russ.)

6. Gurevich P.S. Classical traditions of the philosophy of culture. YAroslavskijpedagogicheskijvestnik, 2016, no. 5, pp. 241-248. (In Russ.)

7. Davydov D.A. The transhumanist "death" of Marxism? Voprosyfilosofii, 2020, no. 3, pp. 54-64, doi: 10.21146/0042-8744-2020-3-54-64. (In Russ.)

8. Danilov A.N. Culture as a genome of civilizational development. Voprosyfilosofii, 2021, no. 3, pp. 215-222, doi: 10.21146/0042-8744-2021-3-215-222. (In Russ.)

9. Ivanov M.A. The ideal of man in the teachings of Karl Marx. Al'ternativy, 2019, no. 3, pp. 6-12. (In Russ.)

10. Ksenofontov S.V. Ideals of traditional education in Russia in the historical past and present. Trudy SaratovskojPravoslavnojDuhovnojseminarii, 2019, no. 13, pp. 308-316. (In Russ.)

11. Kuntuova I. Life of culture and traditions of culture. Sistema cennostejsovremennogoobshchestva, 2011, no. 17-1, pp. 278-283. (In Russ.)

12. Markova T.V., SHetulova E.D. The social ideal in the philosophy of N.A. Berdyaev. VestnikVyatskogogosudarstvennogouniversiteta, 2019, no. 4, pp. 25-30, doi: 10.25730/VSU.7606.19.051. (In Russ.)

13. Mironov V.V. Plato and the modern big-data cave. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogouniversiteta. Filosofiyaikonfliktologiya, 2019, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 4-24, doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2019.101. (In Russ.)

14. Mozzhilin S.I., Ust'yancev V.B. Ideals of culture and the civilizational code of Russia. Voprosyfilosofii, 2021, no. 2, pp. 198-202, doi: 10.21146/0042-8744-2021-2-198-202. (In Russ.)

15. Pavlova S.V. To the question of the legal ideal: a cultural approach. CHernyedyry v Rossijskomzakonodatel'stve, 2019, no. 4, pp. 44-47. (In Russ.)

16. Rakitov A.I. Culture, civilization and modern technologies in the perspective of global transformations. Vekglobalizacii, 2018, no. 3(27), pp. 47-57, doi: 10.30884/vglob/2018.03.05. (In Russ.)

17. Smahtina A.S., SHevchenko L.YU., Veretennikova S.V. National educational ideal: myth or reality? Molodezhnyjinnovacionnyjvestnik, 2020, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 111-113. (In Russ.)

18. Stavceva O.I. Marxism without Leninism: K. Marx's theory and the future of culture. Review of the XVIII International Likhachev Scientific Readings. Voprosyfilosofii, 2018, no. 12, pp. 213-219, doi: 10.31857/S004287440002602-7. (In Russ.)

19. Tkach N.N. Orthodoxy as a synthesis of action and ideals of generations. Gumanitarnyevedomosti TGPU im. L.N. Tolstogo, 2019, no. 4-1(32), pp. 6-12. (In Russ.)

20. Philosophical analytics of the digital age: collection of scientific articles / ed. ed. L.V. Shipovalova, S.I. Angelica. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press, 2020. 368 p. (In Russ.)

21. Clark Kevin B. Digital Life, a Theory of Minds, and Mapping Human and Machine Cultural Universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2020.

22. Cloete Anita L. Living in a Digital Culture: The Need for Theological Reflection. HTS Theological Studies, 2015, vol. 71(2), pp. 01-07.

23. González A.M. Culture as Mediation: Kant on Nature, Culture and Morality. Hildesheim & Zürich & New York, G. Olms, 2011.

24. Gualeni S. The Experience Machine: Existential Reflections on Virtual Worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2016, vol. 9(3).

25. Jackelén A. Technology, Theology, and Spirituality in the Digital Age. Zygon, 2021, vol. 56(1), pp. 6-18.

26. Kokkiou C. Erôs, Song, and Philosophy in Plato: Towards a Synthesis of a Cultural Ideal. Lexington Books, 2020.

27. McDonald M., Gough B., Wearing S. Social Psychology, Consumer Culture and Neoliberalism: A Response to Phelps and White. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 2019, vol. 49(3), pp. 394-400.

28. Nechvatal J. Immersive Ideals / Critical Distances: Study of the Affinity Between Artistic Ideologies in Virtual Reality and Previous Immersive Idioms. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing AG & Co KG, 2010.

29. Ramirez E.J., La Barge S. Real moral problems in the use of virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology, 2018, vol. 4, рp. 249-263.

30. Skowroński K. P. Philosophy in Digital Culture: Images and the Aestheticization of the Public Intellectual’s Narratives. Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, 2020, vol. 4(1), pp. 23-37.

31. Vella D., Gualeni S. Virtual Subjectivity: Existence and Projectuality in Virtual Worlds. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 2019, vol. 23(2), pp. 115-136.