Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

Sobornost as a metaphysical category in the religious personalism of V.S. Solovyov, archpriest Sergiy Bulgakov and archimandrite Sophrony (Sakharov)

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-11

Abstract

Introduction. The article examines collegiality as a category of metaphysics in the religious and philosophical systems of V.S. Solovyov, prot. Sergei Bulgakov and archim. Sophrony (Sakharov). The analysis of the category of collegiality is carried out through the prism of personalism, as a basic concept for the metaphysical thinking of these authors.

Materials and Methods. The research material for the proposed article is monographs and scientific works of Russian researchers devoted to the problems of ecclesiology, sophiology and personalism. In this article, the methods of comparative analysis, historical and philosophical synthesis, generalization, abstraction and interpretation were used.

Results. The main problem posed in this article is the process of reception of the category of collegiality in Russian religious personalism. Sobornost is a term coined in the Slavophil tradition to express the concept of "unity in a plurality." In the metaphysics of total-unity and in neo-patristic synthesis, this category was perceived because it solved one of the basic questions: how are the personality correlated as the One, and the multitude, as the All-unity? This solution was formally different (for sophiology and neopatristic theology), but structurally identical. Sobornost, as unity in the multitude, realized in the Church, has as its prototype the Trinity of God. At the same time, the study states that collegiality was one of the main categories in which the general Sophian personalism of the Russian philosophical tradition was expressed. Sophia in this case means the nature of the Church, open to hypostasis, and through this hypostasis creates the possibility of Theosis of man. The research focuses on three personalities of the Russian intellectual tradition: the philosopher V.S. Soloviev and theologians Archpriest Sergei Bulgakov and Archimandrite Sophrony (Sakharov).

V.S. Soloviev, as the founder of the Russian metaphysics of All-Unity, uses the concept of God-manhood as a metaphysician of conciliarity, transmitting a personalistic impulse to subsequent philosophers. Late nightingale moves away from theistic personalism towards immanetism, but his disciples, among whom was Archpriest. Sergei Bulgakov, connect the category of conciliarity and the concept of God-manhood in sophiological ecclesiology. In this case, prot. Sergei Bulgakov substantiates his cathedral personalism on the basis of a trinitarian anthropological model. The tradition of neo-patristic synthesis, which is analyzed using the example of archimandrite Sophrony (Sakharov), refuses sophiological terminology, preserving the basic intuitions developed in Russian religious philosophy, returning them to the traditional theological field of meanings.

Discussion and Conclusion. In the Slavophil tradition, collegiality is understood historiosophically, in the metaphysics of All-Unity - sophiologically, and in the neopatristic synthesis - ecclesiologically. In the philosophy of the Silver Age and theology, personalism becomes one of the main themes, which leads to the transformation of the category of collegiality towards polyhypostasis as the main property of the nature of the Church. At the same time, we see the transformation of a certain basic personal intuition of collegiality, which comes from the church tradition and returns to it, enriched with philosophical meanings.

About the Authors

D. V. Semikopov
GBUK NO NGIAMZ
Russian Federation

Semikopov Daniil V. – candidate of philosophical sciences, director of Historical Park "Russia is my history", Associate Professor of the Department of Theology and Philosophy

Nizhny Novgorod



I. A. Lebedev
Diocesan Training Center for Church Specialists of the Chuvash Metropolia
Russian Federation

Lebedev Ilya A. (priest) – Master of Theology, Director of the Training Center for Church Specialists named after St. Gurius of Kazan of the Chuvash Metropolia, rector of the Orthodox Parish of the Church of the Dormition of the Most Holy Theotokos v. Akulevo, Cheboksary district of the Chuvash Republic

Cheboksary



А. V. Aksenov
St. Petersburg Theological Academy
Russian Federation

Aksenov Andrey V. (Hieromonk Theodosius) – Master of Theology,  applicant for the Department of Theology; rector of the Orthodox Parish of the Church of the Vladimir Icon of the Mother of God p. Anat-Kinyary Cheboksary district of the Chuvash Republic

St. Petersburg



References

1. Antonij (Hrapovickij), mitropolit. Ilarion (Troickij), svyashchennomuchenik. Sofronij (Saharov), skhiarhimandrit. In the image of the Trinity: a collection of theological articles. Sergiev Posad, STSL Publ., 2013. 174 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bulgakov S.N. Bride of the Lamb: about God-manhood. Moscow, Berlin, Direkt-Media Publ., 2017. 616 p. (In Russ.)

3. Bulgakov Sergij, protoierej. Orthodoxy. Essays on the teachings of the Orthodox Church. St. Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko Publishing House, Satis Orthodox Publishing House, 2011. 224 p. (In Russ.)

4. Vaganova N.A. Sophiology of Archpriest Sergius Bulgakov. Moscow, PSTGU Publ., 2011. 459 p. (In Russ.)

5. Lur'e V.M. "Catholicity": the appearance of the term and concept in the works of Pseudo-Khomyakov. Homyakov A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem: v 12 tomah. T.8. St. Petersburg, Rostok Publ., 2021. Pp. 177-190. (In Russ.)

6. Polovinkin S.M. Russian personalism. Moscow, Sinaksis Publ., 2020. 1156 p. (In Russ.)

7. Samarin YU.F. Collected works: in 5 volumes / ed. ed. A.N. Nikolyukin. St. Petersburg, Rostok Publ., 2013. Vol. 1. 527 p. (In Russ.)

8. Solov'ev V.S. Readings on God-manhood. Solov'ev V.S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem. T. 4. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2011. 812 p. (In Russ.)

9. Solov'ev V.S. Spiritual foundations of life. Solov'ev V.S. Sobranie sochinenij: v 10 tomah. T. 3. St. Petersburg, 1912. Pp. 301-416. (In Russ.)

10. Solov'ev V.S. National question in Russia. Issue 1. Solov'ev V.S. Sobranie sochinenij: v 10 tomah. T.5. St. Petersburg, b.g. Pp. 1-153. (In Russ.)

11. Solov'ev V.S. The concept of God. Solov'ev V.S. Sobranie sochinenij: v 10 tomah. T. 9. St. Petersburg, b.g. Pp. 3-29. (In Russ.)

12. Solov'ev V.S. Theoretical philosophy. Solov'ev V.S. Sobranie sochinenij: v 10 tomah. T. 9. St. Petersburg, b.g. Pp. 89-166. (In Russ.)

13. Sofronij (Saharov), arhim. See God as he is. Holy Trinity Sergius Lavra, 2011. 400 p. (In Russ.)

14. Sofronij (Saharov), arhim. Mystery of the Christian life. Holy Trinity Sergius Lavra, 2009. 272 p. (In Russ.)

15. Hondzinskij P.V., Kyrlezhev A.I. Sobornost in the Russian theological tradition. Voprosy teologii, 2019, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 427-440. (In Russ.)

16. Cvalen R. Different concepts of the image of God in the works of Nikolai Berdyaev and Sergei Bulgakov. Bogoslovie lichnosti. Moscow, BBI Publishing House, 2013. Pp. 168-180. (In Russ.)

17. SHaposhnikov L.E. Conservatism, modernism and innovation in Russian Orthodox thought of the XIX-XXI centuries. 2nd edition, enlarged and revised. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press, 2006. 327 p. (In Russ.)

18. SHaposhnikov L.E. Philosophy of conciliarity. Essays on Russian identity. St. Petersburg, 1996. 199 p. (In Russ.)


Review

Views: 1764


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)