Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

Levels of formation of visual competence of future teachers

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-3-2

Abstract

Introduction. Today, the main informational need of a person is to extract the meaning of the transmitted data in large amounts of information. A popular way to optimize the perception and transmission of information is its visualization. A modern teacher should be ready to convey to the students the necessary amount of knowledge in an accessible form, to increase and maintain interest in the subject being studied. Therefore, for the future teacher, it is relevant to have competencies in the field of perception and development of visual images that determine his visual competence. Understanding what level of formation visual competence corresponds to helps to evaluate the achieved result, to establish strategies for further learning. The purpose of the study is to determine and theoretically substantiate the levels of formation of the visual competence of a future teacher.

Materials and Methods. A systematic approach was used as the methodological basis of the study. To achieve the goal of the study, various methods were used: analysis, synthesis, generalization, comparison, formalization, pedagogical design.

Results. Four levels of development of visual competence of future teachers are indicated: initial, basic, practice-oriented, professionally-oriented. To determine the student's compliance with a specific level of visual competence, a number of criteria were defined: possession of graphic knowledge and skills, search and analysis of information, selection and analysis of the capabilities of software tools and services, use of the capabilities of graphic editors to build visual images, use of the capabilities of visual tools in professional activities. Compliance indicators are indicated for each criterion.

Discussion and Conclusions. The formation of visual competence is an extended process and is carried out in the study of the subject-methodological module, the passage of educational and pedagogical practices, and the performance of research activities. Compliance with the designated criteria at a certain level gives an idea of the preparedness of the future teacher for professional activities.

About the Authors

E. S. Vaseva
Nizhny Tagil state socio-pedagogical Institute (branch) of Federal State Autonomous educational institution «Russian state vocational pedagogical University»
Russian Federation

Vaseva Elena S. – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, assistant professor at Information Technology Department

Nizhny Tagil



N. V. Buzhinskaya
Nizhny Tagil state socio-pedagogical Institute (branch) of Federal State Autonomous educational institution «Russian state vocational pedagogical University»
Russian Federation

Buzhinskaya Nadezhda V. – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, assistant professor at Information Technology Department

Nizhny Tagil



References

1. Buzhinskaya N.V., Vaseva E.S. Implementation of an individual approach in the process of studying computer graphics by students. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Pedagogicheskie nauki, 2020, no. 4, pp. 69-74. (In Russ.)

2. Vatkova O.A. Infographics as a means of forming the visual competence of a student of a pedagogical university. APRIORI. Ceriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2015, no. 6, p. 7. (In Russ.)

3. Velilyaeva Z.R., Tarhan L.Z. Graphic literacy of a vocational education teacher. Innovacionnaya nauchnaya sovremennaya akademicheskaya issledovatel'skaya traektoriya (INSAJT), 2021, no. 3(6), pp. 92-102, doi: https://doi.org/10.17853/2686-8970-2021-3-92-102. (In Russ.)

4. Kirillova A.K., Petrov A.K. Problems of using graphic technologies in education. Aktual'nye problemy dizajn-obrazovaniya: materialy X Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-metodicheskoj konferencii vuzov Rossii, Sankt-Peterburg, 23–28 aprelya 2018 goda. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskij gosudarstvennyj universitet promyshlennyh tekhnologij i dizajna Publ., 2018. Pp. 61-67. (In Russ.)

5. Kolyhmatov V.I. Digital transformation of education: a new quality of the modern teacher of the future. Sovremennoe obrazovanie: soderzhanie, tekhnologii, kachestvo, 2021, vol. 1, pp. 22-25. (In Russ.)

6. Komenskij YA.A. Great didactics. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1989. 416 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kroshenova M.E., Malenova O.E. Visualization of information and infographics: a teaching aid for students in the field of study 42.03.03 "Publishing". Ulyanovsk, UlGTU Publ., 2018. 80 p. (In Russ.)

8. Onishchenko L.A., Matushkina I.YU. Curriculum as a basis for organizing the educational process. Vestnik Permskogo nacional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Mashinostroenie, materialovedenie, 2015, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 110-117, doi: https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9877/2015.3.11. (In Russ.)

9. Prozorov R.YU. Anthropological meaning of the category of "visual communication". Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, no. 14, pp. 169-173. (In Russ.)

10. Romanova E.K., Trojnikova E.V. Portfolio technology as a way to develop visual cultural competence. Voprosy lingvodidaktiki i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannyh yazykov: sbornik nauchnyh statej po materialam XIII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Cheboksary, 2016. Pp. 161-165. (In Russ.)

11. Rudneva N.E., YUstus I.V. The system of formation of visual competence among design students. Srednee professional'noe obrazovanie, 2019, no. 4, pp. 13-18. (In Russ.)

12. Russo ZH.-ZH. Pedagogical essays. Vol. 1. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1981. 653 p. (In Russ.)

13. Tokareva YU.A., Gasparovich E.O. Management of professional competencies: teaching aid. Yekaterinburgб Ural University Press, 2021. 327 p. (In Russ.)

14. Trojnikova E.V. The study of visual competence in the didactics of intercultural communication. Mnogoyazychie v obrazovatel'nom prostranstve, 2016, no. 8, pp. 16-23. (In Russ.)

15. Ugryumova M.V. Place and name of disciplines and practices in the curriculum of educational programs of higher education. Nauchno-metodicheskij elektronnyj zhurnal Koncept, 2017, no. 7, pp. 7-20, doi: https://doi.org/10.24422/MCITO.2017.V11.8133. (In Russ.)

16. Ushinskij K.D. Pedagogy. Selected works. Moscow, Yurait Publishing House, 2019. 258 p. (In Russ.)

17. Federal state educational standard of higher education in the direction of training 44.03.01 Pedagogical education (bachelor's degree level). Available at: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/fgosvob/440301.pdf (accessed: 18.01.2022). (In Russ.)

18. Federal state educational standard of higher education in the direction of training 44.03.05 Pedagogical education (with two training profiles) (undergraduate level)”. Available at: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/fgosvob/440305.pdf (accessed: 18.01.2022). (In Russ.)

19. Filatova O.P., Komissarova S.A. Formation of information competence of teachers in the field of visualization of educational and methodological material. Vestnik Volgogradskoj akademii MVD Rossii, 2015, no. 4(35), pp. 117-123. (In Russ.)

20. Hutorskoj A.V. Five typologies of competencies in education. Vestnik Instituta obrazovaniya cheloveka, 2022, no. 1. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_48940244_45367410.pdf (accessed: 18.01.2022). (In Russ.)

21. CHervonnyj M.A. The context of pedagogical education. Praksema. Problemy vizual'noj semiotiki, 2019, no. 4(22), pp. 206-222, doi: https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-206-222. (In Russ.)

22. An official website of the European Union. The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomp/digital-competence-framework (accessed: 18.01.2022).

23. Billmayer F. Acquiring visual competencies with situation-based assignments. International Journal of Education through Art, 2019, vol. 15, pp. 85-94, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/eta.15.1.85_1.

24. Carretero Gomez S., Vuorikari R., Punie Y. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2760/38842.

25. Chervonnyy M.A. Semiotic potential of teacher education. Education & Pedagogy Journal, 2022, no. 1(3), pp. 13-22, doi: https://doi.org/10.23951/2782-2575-2022-1-13-22.

26. Fernandes A., Ribeiro M. Teacher digital literacy. 2021. Рр. 1101-1110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2021.0323.

27. Haanstra F., Wagner E. A European Framework for Visual Competencies. 2019. Pp. 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978061.ead101.

28. Hanan A., Firman E., Putri A. Investigating English teachers’ digital literacy in the context of online learting. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i3.3544.

29. Kulikova T., Poddubnaya N., Bagdasaryan L., Ardeev A. The technique for future teachers’ digital literacy development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, vol. 1691, article number 012129.

30. Mincheva K., Planska-Simeonova K. Scientific research in the field of visual competency. 2019. Pp. 5110-5117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.1263

31. Prakel D. Visual literacy. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003103943-10.

32. Schonau D. Visual Competency and the Structure of «Making» in Art Education. Cloutier et al. Making. Proceedings InSEA 2019 World Congress. Viseu, InSEA Pubications, 2019. Pp. 694-699. Available at: https://www.insea2019.org/congress-proceedings-abstracts (accessed: 18.01.2022).

33. Serafini F. Visual Literacy. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.19.


Review

Views: 388


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)