Children's vision of the covid-19 pandemic: gender-specific views of older preschoolers and younger schoolchildren
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2021-9-4-14
Abstract
Introduction. This article presents the results of the research project "Children's Vision of the COVID-19 pandemic" implemented in 2020. According to many experts, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to negative consequences for the physical (somatic), psychic and psychological and the health of the population. The works of foreign and domestic authors state the facts of a number of negative psychological effects of an emotional, mental and behavioral nature. However, against the background of the available research, a significant gap is found, which concerns the children's version of the perception of the situation of the pandemic and forced isolation, and above all its gender specificity in relation to the stage of early ontogenesis – senior preschool and primary school age.
Materials and Methods. To collect the actual data, a projective verbal method of writing a story on the theme "The Tale of the Coronavirus" was used. In total, 138 stories were collected (68 of them were composed by girls and 70 by boys), the content analysis of which was carried out through the open coding procedure. Comparative gender analysis of the texts of the stories was conducted in seven main categories: "characteristics of the coronavirus", "origin of the coronavirus", "current (frustrated) needs", "resources for overcoming difficulties", "emotions", "key events" and "gender of the characters".
Results. The data obtained showed the predominantly negative nature of children's views of the coronavirus, pronounced discomfort in most of them caused by frustration of the needs for security, freedom, positive emotions and social contacts, the predominance of a mostly anxious emotional background of the perception of the pandemic situation with a predominance of fear, as well as a special emphasis on such resources for overcoming difficulties as compliance with preventive measures and hygiene rules, medical care and restriction of activity. At the same time, the gender specificity of children's ideas about the COVID-19 pandemic was found, which consists in a more pronounced orientation towards people of their own sex, emphasizing their own role in solving the problem and focusing on active resistance to the threat in boys and focusing on the emotional side of events, emphasizing the role of others and waiting for salvation from outside in girls.
Discussion and Conclusions. According to the results of the study, it is concluded that the content of ideas about the COVID-19 pandemic and self-isolation of girls and boys of senior preschool and primary school age, along with general trends, has a gender specificity, which reflects the results of differentiated gender socialization prevailing at the stages of early ontogenesis, based on the tradition of gender polarization.
Keywords
About the Authors
L. E. SemenovaRussian Federation
Semenova Lidiya E. – Doctor of psychology, Assistant Professor, Professor of Department of General and Clinical Psychology
Researcher ID: O-6416-2017
Nizhny Novgorod
V. E. Semenova
Russian Federation
Semenova Vera E. – Candidate of philosophy, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor of Department of Preschool Education
Nizhny Novgorod
I. A. Koneva
Russian Federation
Koneva Irina A. – Candidate of psychology Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor of Department of Special Pedagogy and Psychology
Researcher ID: J-7619-2017
Nizhny Novgorod
N. V. Karpushkina
Russian Federation
Karpushkina Natalya V. – Candidate of psychology, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor of Department of Special Pedagogy and Psychology
Researcher ID: J-7028-2017
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Alyohin A.N., Dubinina E.A. Pandemic: clinical and psychological aspect. Arterial'naya gipertenziya, 2020, no. 26(3), pp. 312-316, doi: 10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-3-312-316. (In Russ.)
2. Byhovec YU.V., Kogan-Lerner L.B. Pandemic COVID-19 as a multifactorial traumatic situation. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social'naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya, 2020, vol. 5, no. 2(18), pp. 291-308. (In Russ.)
3. Gayazova L.A., Vihristyuk O.V. Features of requests for remote psychological assistance during self-isolation (COVID-19). Vyzovy pandemii COVID-19: psihicheskoe zdorov'e, distancionnoe obrazovanie, internet-bezopasnost': sbornik materialov. Tom 1 / sostaviteli: V.V. Rubcov, A.A. SHvedovskaya; red.: V.V. Rubcov, A.A. Margolis, I.V. Vachkov, O.V. Vihristyuk, N.V. Dvoryanchikov, T.V. Ermolova, YU.M. Zabrodin, N.N. Tolstyh, A.V. Haustov, A.B. Holmogorova, A.A. SHvedovskaya. Moscow, FGBOU VO MGPPU Publ., 2020. Pp. 403-419. (In Russ.)
4. Gerasimova A.A., Holmogorova A.B. Coping strategies, psychological well-being and problematic use of the Internet during a pandemic. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2020, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 31-40, doi: 10.17759/pse.2020250603. (In Russ.)
5. Gricenko V.V., Reznik A.D., Konstantinov V.V. i dr. Fear of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and basic beliefs of the personality. Klinicheskaya i special'naya psihologiya, 2020, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 99-118, doi: 10.17759/cpse.2020090205. (In Russ.)
6. Enikolopov S.N., Bojko O.M., Medvedeva T.I., Voroncova O.YU., Kaz'mina O.YU. Dynamics of psychological reactions at the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya, 2020, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 108-126, doi: 10.17759/psyedu.2020120207. (In Russ.)
7. Ermolova T.V., Litvinov A.V., Savickaya N.V., Krukovskaya O.A. Сovid-19 and students' mental health: foreign studies. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya, 2021, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 79-91, doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100108. (In Russ.)
8. Kon I.S. A man in a changing world. Moscow, Vremya Publ., 2009. 496 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kochetova YU.A., Klimakova M.V. Studies of the mental state of people in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya, 2021, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 48-56, doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100105. (In Russ.)
10. Nestik T.A. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on society: a socio-psychological analysis. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social'naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya, 2020, vol. 5, no. 2(18), pp. 47-83, doi: 10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.002. (In Russ.)
11. Ostrovskij D.I., Ivanova T.I. The impact of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19 on human mental health (Literature review). Omskij psihiatricheskij zhurnal, 2020, no. 2-1S(24), pp. 4-10, doi: 10.24411/2412-8805-2020-10201. (In Russ.)
12. Radina N.K., Nikitina A.A. The Social Psychology of Masculinity: A Socio-Constructivist Approach. Moscow, Borges Publ., 2011. 172 p. (In Russ.)
13. Rasskazova E.I., Leont'ev D.A., Lebedeva A.A. Pandemic as a challenge to subjective well-being: anxiety and coping. Konsul'tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya, 2020, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 90-108, doi: 10.17759/cpp.2020280205. (In Russ.)
14. Semenova L.E. Formation of a child as a gender subject in the process of personal development in senior preschool and primary school age in conditions of ontogenesis and dysontogenesis: the dissertation of the doctor of psychological sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, 2010. 521 p. (In Russ.)
15. Semenova L.E., Sachkova M.E., CHevachina A.E. Gender characteristics of the manifestation of egocentrism in the process of interpersonal relations of older preschoolers. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta, 2016, no. 2. Available at: https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/220 (accessed: 17.04.2021). (In Russ.)
16. Semenova L.E., Semenova V.E. Pandemic of coronavirus infection COVID-19 and self-isolation in the perception of children of senior preschool and primary school age. Sistemnaya psihologiya i sociologiya, 2020, no. 3(35), pp. 85-101, doi: 10.25688/2223-6872.2020.35.3.7. (In Russ.)
17. Sorokin M.YU., Kas'yanov E.D., Rukavishnikov G.V., Makarevich O.V., Neznanov N.G., Lutova N.B., Mazo G.E. Psychological reactions of the population as a factor of adaptation to the COVID-19 pandemic. Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoj psihologii, 2020, no. 2, pp. 87-94, doi: 10.31363/2313-7053-2020-2-87-94. (In Russ.)
18. Strauss A., Korbin Dzh. Fundamentals of qualitative research: grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2001. 256 p. (In Russ.)
19. Ushakov D.V., YUrevich A.V., YUrevich M.A. Expert survey on the psychological context of the coronavirus epidemic. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social'naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya, 2020, vol. 5, no. 2(18), pp. 115-153, doi:10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.004. (In Russ.)
20. Fedosenko E.V. Life after quarantine: the psychology of meanings and the coronavirus COVID-19. Psihologicheskie problemy smysla zhizni i akme, 2020, no. XXV, pp. 34-47. (In Russ.)
21. SHuruhina T.N., Dovgal' G.V., Gluhih E.V., Klyuchnikov D.A. Analysis of the first results of the transition of Russian education to distance learning formats during the COVID-19 global pandemic. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2020, no. 6. Available at: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=30265 (accessed: 24.03.2021). (In Russ.)
22. Ahorsu D.K., Lin Ch.-Y., Imani V., Saffari M., Griffiths M.D., Pakpour A.H. The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8.
23. Bish A., Michie S. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2010, vol. 15, pp. 797-824.
24. Brooks S.K., Webster R.K., Smith L.E. et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet, 2020, vol. 395, рp. 912-920, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8.
25. Caleo G., Duncombe J., Jephcott F. et al. The factors affecting household transmission dynamics and community compliance with Ebola control measures: a mixed-methods study in a rural village in Sierra Leone. BMC Public Health, 2018. 232 р.
26. Cullen W., Gulati G., Kelly B.D. Mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2020, vol. 113, no. 5, рp. 311-312.
27. Desclaux A., Badji D., Ndione A.G. Accepted monitoring or endured quarantine? Ebola contacts' perceptions in Senegal. Social Science & Medicine, 2017, vol. 178, pp. 38-45.
28. Drouin M. et al. How Parents and Their Children Used Social Media and Technology at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associations with Anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2020, vol. 23, no. 11, doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0284.
29. Garfin D.R., Silver R.C., Holman E.A. The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure. Health Psychology, 2020, vol. 39(5), pp. 355-357, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000875.
30. Jakovljevic M., Bjedov S., Jaksic N. COVID-19 pandemia and public and global mental health from the perspective of global health security. Psychiatria Danubina, 2020, vol. 32(1), рp. 6-14, doi: 10.24869/psyd.2020.6.
31. Kontoangelos K., Economou M., Papageorgiou Ch. Mental Health E-ects of COVID-19 Pandemia: A Review of Clinical and Psychological Traits. Psychiatry Investigation, 2020, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 491-505, doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0161.
32. Lima C.K.T., Carvalho P.M.M., Lima I.A.A.S., Nunes J.V.A.O., Saraiva J.S., de Souza R.I., da Silva C.G.L., Neto M.L.R. The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new coronavirus disease). Psychiatry Research, 2020, vol. 287, article number: 112915, doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112915.
33. Matias T., Dominski F.H., Marks D.F. Human needs in COVID-19 isolation. Journal of Health Psychology, 2020, vol. 25(7), pp. 871-882, doi: 10.1177/1359105320925149.
34. Pellecchia U., Crestani R., Decroo T. Social consequences of Ebola containment measures in Liberia. PLoS One, 2015, vol. 10(12), article number: e0143036, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143036.
35. Samantha K., Webster R., Smith L., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N., Rubin G. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet, 2020, vol. 395, pp. 912-920.
36. Silver R.C. Surviving the trauma of COVID-19. Science, 2020, vol. 369, no. 6499, p. 11, doi: 10.1126/science.abd5396.
37. Wang C., Pan R., Wan X., Tan Y., Xu L., Ho C.S., Ho R.C. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17(5), article number: 1729, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729.
38. Wang Y., Xu B., Zhao G. Is quarantine related to immediate negative psychological consequences during the 2009 H1N1 epidemic? General Hospital Psychiatry, 2011, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 75-77.