Comparative analysis of the subjective perception of oneself as a future parent among married couples with different reproductive history
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2021-9-4-8
Abstract
Introduction. The problem of infertility is widely known around the world. According to WHO, 3% of the world's population suffers from infertility. In Russia, the problem of infertility is extremely urgent, the number of couples applying for assisted reproductive technologies is growing every year. However, the number of positive IVF protocols, successful pregnancy outcomes, and the quality of life of children born prematurely is still not high. There are more than 700 factors that affect the outcome of pregnancy, most of which are poorly understood, and research in various fields continues. In addition to the proven physiological factors that affect the outcome of pregnancy, there are a number of poorly understood factors that cause idiopathic infertility.
Materials and Methods. Author's semi-structured interview for a married couple during pregnancy. Male and female version of the interview. Repeated author's interview for a woman in the early postpartum period. Content analysis.
Results. The main results obtained during the interview were analyzed. Such as the subjective assessment of the perception of pregnancy (physical, emotional experiences), the motive of pregnancy, the assessment of one's own parental readiness to raise a child, parental competencies, changes in marital roles, studying the lifestyle before and during pregnancy, contact with one's own parents, behavior during childbirth, primary contact with a newborn child.
Discussion and Conclusions. According to the results of the study, conclusions were obtained indicating the importance of timely provision of psychological assistance to pregnant women as a result of the use of ART. Women who are pregnant with ART are more anxious, less self-oriented, more likely to have obstetric and neonatal complications, difficulties with primary psychological contact with a newborn child, difficulties with breastfeeding.
Keywords
pregnancy,
assisted reproductive technologies,
IVF,
ART,
infertility,
idiopathic infertility,
psychology ofthe reproductive sphere,
comparative analysis
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out with the financial support of the RFBR Grant No. 20-013-00759 A.
About the Author
V. A. Moshkivskaya
City Perinatal Center No. 1
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moshkivskaya Valentina A. – medical psychologist
SPIN‐код: 3218-8964
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Andreeva A.D. The image of family and parenting in modern mothers: a cross-cultural study. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental'naya psihologiya, 2016, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 17-30. (In Russ.)
2. Bojko E.L., Posiseeva L.V., Malyshkina A.I. Rehabilitation of married couples with early miscarriage in history. Medicinskij sovet, 2014, no. 9. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/reabilitatsiya-supruzheskih-par-s-nevynashivaniemberemennosti-rannih-srokov-v-anamneze (accessed: 01.02.2021). (In Russ.)
3. Bloh M.E. Dynamics of marital relations during pregnancy. Reproduktivnoe zdorov'e sem'i v perinatal'noj psihologii: materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. St. Petersburg, 2013. Pp. 37-41. (In Russ.)
4. Burina E.A., Moshkivskaya V.A., Kulieva A.K. Personal characteristics of women who are pregnant as a result of the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Anan'evskie chteniya – 2020. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. St. Petersburg, SPBGU Publ., 2020. Pp. 980-981. (In Russ.)
5. Vagapova A.R. Formation of ideas among young people about motherhood and fatherhood. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika, 2015, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 31-35. (In Russ.)
6. Vasil'eva E.N. Gender differences in the structural components of psychological readiness for parenthood. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2013, no. 6, p. 853. (In Russ.)
7. Gavrilova V.E. Psychological preconditions of infertility in healthy married women. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya: Psihologiya, 2018, vol. 11, no. 3. pp. 103-109, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/psy180312. (In Russ.)
8. Grof S. Travel in search of yourself. Moscow, AST Publ., 2008. 248 p. (In Russ.)
9. Dobryakov I.V. Perinatal psychology. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2010. 272 p. (In Russ.)
10. Dobryakov I.V. Features of the course of the perinatal period and the psychomotor development of an infant depending on the type of psychological component of the gestational dominant. Psihicheskoe zdorov'e, 2010, no. 12, pp. 13-18. (In Russ.)
11. Prohorenko N.F., Ginoyan A.B. Reform of the compulsory health insurance system: time is running out. Vestnik VSHOUZ, 2018, no. 4, pp. 28-52. (In Russ.)
12. Savenysheva S.S. Satisfaction with marriage and attitude to pregnancy and child in pregnant women. Vestnik SPBGU, 2016, no. 53-11, pp. 239-246. (In Russ.)
13. Safina N.YU., YAmandi T.A., CHernyh V.B., Akulenko L.V., Bogolyubov S.V., Vityazeva I.I., Ryzhkova O.P., Stepanova A.A., Adyan T.A., Bliznec E.A., Polyakov A.V. Genetic factors of male infertility, their combinations and spermiological characteristics of men with impaired fertility. Andrologiya i genital'naya hirurgiya, 2018, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 40-51, doi: https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2018-19-2-40-51. (In Russ.)
14. Skvorcova M.YU., Priluckaya S.G., Barskaya E.S. Features of the psychoemotional state of women during pregnancy resulting from the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Doktor.Ru, 2018, no. 10(154), pp. 62-67, doi: 10.31550/1727-2378-2018-154-10-62-67. (In Russ.)
15. Ul'yanich A.L., Bohan T.G., Leshchinskaya S.B., Agarkova L.A., Kucenko I.G., Miheenko G.A. Features of the internal picture of pregnancy in women with somatic complications with the threat of termination of pregnancy. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, vol. 21, no. 2(78), pp. 435-450, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-2-435-450. (In Russ.)
16. Hachatryan L.A. Trends in changes in the modern Russian family. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya, 2014, no. 4(20), pp. 111-118. (In Russ.)
17. SHamilova N.V. Psychological reasons for impaired adaptation to pregnancy and motherhood. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 2016, no. 50-2, pp. 226-232. (In Russ.)
18. Astley S.J. Fetal alcohol syndrome prevention in Washington State: evidence of success. Paedietric and perinatal Epidemiology, 2004, vol. 18, no. 5, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00582.x 33.
19. Alahmar F., Ahmed T. Role of Oxidative Stress in Male Infertility: An Updated Review. Journal of human reproductive sciences, 2019, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 4-18, doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_150_18.
20. Babakhanzadeh E. Some of the Factors Involved in Male Infertility: A Prospective Review. International journal of general medicine, 2020, vol. 13, pp. 29-41, doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S241099.
21. Biddle Z., O’Callaghan F.V., Finlay-Jones A.L., Reid N.E. Caregivers of Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Psychosocial Factors and Evidence for Self-compassion as a Potential Intervention Target. Mindfulness, 2020, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2189-2198.
22. Crosignani P.G., Rubin B.L. Optimal use of infertility diagnostic tests and treatments. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Hum Reprod, 2000, vol. 15, no. 3, pp.723-732, doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.723.
23. Christian L.M., Franco A., Iams J.D., Sheridan J., Glaser R. Depressive symptoms predict exaggerated inflammatory responses to an in vivo immune challenge among pregnant women. Brain, Behavior and Immunity, 2010, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 49-53, doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.05.055.
24. Gabnai-Nagy E, Bugán A, Bodnár B, Papp G, Nagy BE. Association between Emotional State Changes in Infertile Couples and Outcome of Fertility Treatment. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2020, vol. 80, no. 2, doi: 10.1055/a-0854-5987.
25. Golombok S. Modern families: Parents and children in new family forms. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2015. Рp. 111-113.
26. Khizroeva J., Nalli C., Bitsadze V., Lojacono A., Zatti S., Andreoli L., Tincani A., Shoenfeld Y., Makatsariya A. Infertility in women with systemic autoimmune diseases. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2019, vol. 33, no. 6, doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.101369.
27. Kleanthi G, Alexithymia M. Stress and Depression in Infertile Women: a Case Control Study. Mater Sociomed, 2021, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 70-74, doi: 10.5455/msm.2021.33.70-74
28. Linder R. Overcoming Somatic and Psychological Difficulties: New Experiences from an Integrated Linkage of Obstetrics and Psychotherapy. Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health, 2010, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 201-215.
29. Marín-Morales D., Carmona-Monge F.J. Personality Depressive symptoms during pregnancy and their influence on postnatal depression in Spanish pregnant Spanish women. Anales de Psicología, 2014, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 908-915, doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.153101.
30. Maroufizadeh S., Navid B., Omani-Samani R., Amini P. The effects of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms on the clinical pregnancy rate in women undergoing IVF treatment. BMC Res Notes, 2019, vol. 12, no. 1, doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4294-0.
31. McCrory C., McNally C. The Effect of Pregnancy Intention on Maternal Prenatal Behaviours and Parent and Child Health: Results of an Irish Cohort Study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2013, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 208-215, doi: 10.1111/ppe.12027.
32. Mustafa A., Ali A., Mustafa M., A., Samarraie M. Physiological and hormonal study of women infertility. Science Archives, 2020, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 160-165, doi: 10.47587/SA.2020.1314.
33. Pandruvada S., Royfman R., Shah T.A., Sindhwani P., Dupree J.M., Schon S., Avidor-Reiss T. Lack of trusted diagnostic tools for undetermined male infertility. Journal Assist Reprod Genet, 2021, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 265-276, doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-02037-5.
34. Saunders T.A., Lobel M., Veloso C., Meyer B.S. Prenatal maternal stress is associated with delivery analgesia and unplanned cesareans. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006, vol. 27, no. 3, рp. 141-146, doi: 10.1080/01674820500420637.
35. Stark M.A., Brinkley R.L. The relationship between perceived stress and health-promoting behaviors in high-risk pregnancy. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 2007, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 307-314.
36. Standeven L.R., McEvoy K.O., Osborne L.M. Progesterone, reproduction, and psychiatric illness. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2020, vol. 69, pp.108-126, doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.001.
37. Szkodziak F., Krzyżanowski J., Szkodziak P. Psychological aspects of infertility. A systematic review, 2020, vol. 48, no. 6, doi: 10.1177/0300060520932403.
38. Turner K.A., Rambhatla A., Schon S., Agarwal A., Krawetz S.A., Dupree J.M., Avidor-Reiss T. Male Infertility is a Women's Health Issue-Research and Clinical Evaluation of Male Infertility Is Needed. Cells, 2020, vol. 16, no. 9, doi: 10.3390/cells9040990.
39. Thurston L, Abbara A, Dhillo WS. Investigation and management of subfertility. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2019, vol. 72, no. 9, doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205579.
40. Vander Borght M., Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clinical Biochemistry, 2018, vol. 62, no. 2, doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012.
41. Wall G. Mothers’ experiences with intensive parenting and brain development discourse. Women’s Studies International Forum, 2010, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 253-263.
42. Xavier M.J., Salas-Huetos A., Oud M.S. Disease gene discovery in male infertility: past, present and future. Human Genetics, 2021, vol. 140, pp. 7-19, doi: 10.1007/s00439-020-02202-x.
Review
Views:
1546
Email this article 