Prospects for Using the Digital Footprint in Educational and Scientific Processes
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2021-9-3-1
Abstract
Introduction. Analysis of the digital footprint of a student and / or a researcher is a promising area for optimizing the individual development path.
Materials and Methods. Various approaches to the interpretation and use of the digital footprint are considered. A model of the use of a trace is given, depending on the didactic task being solved, the choice of which determines the use of a specific digital tool from the cloud. The work uses various methods: analysis of articles and publications on the selected topic, systematization of the knowledge gained, classification and interpretation of terms and concepts.
Results. The authors considered the features of the analysis of digital traces in such environments, programs, applications, websites, electronic resources such as a scientific electronic library, a search query service, social networks, international databases of scientific publications, citation services, services for managing joint projects, websites for Internet seminars (webinars), Moodle learning environment, video hosting, etc.
Discussion and Conclusions. The study of digital footprints is a promising area. The advantages of this approach include: the ability to declare oneself as a research scientist; active search for like-minded people on the Internet; understanding the area of scientific interest; the possibility of receiving feedback, incl. advice from the professional community.
About the Authors
M. E. Vayndorf-Sysoeva
Moscow Pedagogical State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vayndorf-Sysoeva Marina E. – Ph.D, Professor of the Department of Technology and Professional Training
Moscow
V. V. Pchelyakova
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pchelyakova Viktoria V. – Ph.D. in Economics, 1st year undergraduate student of the Institute of Physics and Technology
Moscow
References
1. Baranova E.V., Vereshchagina N.O., SHvecov G.V. Digital tools for the analysis of educational activities of students. Izvestiya RGPU im. A. I. Gercena, 2020, no. 198. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovye-instrumenty-dlya-analiza-uchebnoy-deyatelnosti-studentov (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
2. Biankina A.O. Digital technologies and their role in the modern economy. Ekonomika i socium: sovremennye modeli razvitiya, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 15-25. (In Russ.)
3. Bogdanova D.A. Socialization of personality in the World Wide Web. Narodnoe obrazovanie, 2018, no. 1-2(1466). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsializatsiya-lichnosti-vo-vsemirnoy-pautine (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
4. Bogdanova D.A. Man on the Internet. SHkol'nye tekhnologii, 2018, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chelovek-v-internete (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
5. Brodovskaya E.V., Dombrovskaya A.YU., Petrova T.E., Pyrma R.V., Azarov A.A. The digital environment of the leading universities of the world and the Russian Federation: the results of a comparative analysis of these sites. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2019, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 9-22, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-12-9-22. (In Russ.)
6. Brykin YU.V. Electronic educational environment: normative and substantive components. Vestnik RMAT, 2018, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnaya-obrazovatelnaya-sreda-normativnye-i-soderzhatelnye-sostavlyayuschie (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
7. Vajndorf-Sysoeva M.E., Subocheva M.L. "Digital education" as a system-forming category: approaches to definition. Vestnik MGOU. Seriya: Pedagogika, 2018, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovoe-obrazovanie-kak-sistemoobrazuyuschaya-kategoriya-podhody-k-opredeleniyu (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
8. Kirichenko E.V., Sytnikov D.A., Petuhov A.V., Kacko I.A. Search query statistics. Nauchnyj zhurnal KubGAU, 2013, no. 93. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/statistika-poiskovyh-zaprosov (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
9. Mantulenko V.V. Prospects for the use of digital footprint in higher education. Prepodavatel' HKHI vek, 2020, no. 3-1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/perspektivy-ispolzovaniya-tsifrovogo-sleda-v-vysshem-obrazovanii (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
10. Magomedova N.A. Prospects for the use of technologies of social networks in the educational process. Voprosy strukturizacii ekonomiki, 2012, no. 4. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/perspektivy-ispolzovaniya-tehnologiy-sotsialnyh-setey-v-obrazovatelnom-protsesse (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
11. Markova V.D., Markov A.A. Digitization, or data flow-based management. Innovacii, 2019, no. 7(249). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovizatsiya-ili-upravlenie-na-osnove-potoka-dannyh (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
12. Matorina I.N., Nurieva N.S. Blended learning as a means of optimizing the educational process at a university. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennosti: nauka i obshchestvo, 2020, no. 3(28). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/smeshannoe-obuchenie-kak-sredstvo-optimizatsii-obrazovatelnogo-protsessa-v-vuze (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
13. Nikolaenko G.A. Prospects for using researchers' digital traces to analyze their communication strategies (on the example of the ResearchGate social network). Sociologiya nauki i tekhnologij, 2019, no. 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/perspektivy-ispolzovaniya-tsifrovyh-sledov-issledovateley-dlya-analiza-ih-kommunikativnyh-strategiy-na-primere-sotsialnoy-seti (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
14. Panyukova S.V. Digital tools and services in the work of a teacher: teaching aid. Moscow, Publishing house "Pro-Press", 2020. 33 p. (In Russ.)
15. Popova N.A. Educational Intensive as a New Format for Implementing Project-Based Education. Sovremennaya vysshaya shkola: innovacionnyj aspect, 2020, no. 1(47). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazovatelnyy-intensiv-kak-novyy-format-realizatsii-proektnogo-obucheniya (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
16. Prirodova O.F., Danilova A.V., Morgun A.N. The structure of the digital educational environment: regulatory and methodological aspects. Pedagogika i psihologiya obrazovaniya, 2020, no. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/struktura-tsifrovoy-obrazovatelnoy-sredy-normativno-pravovye-i-metodicheskie-aspekty (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
17. Tronin V.G., Karsukova D.V. The effectiveness of the model of open access to publications on the example of comparing scientific electronic libraries of the RSL and "CyberLeninka". Vestnik UlGTU, 2018, no. 1(81). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/effektivnost-modeli-otkrytogo-dostupa-k-publikatsiyam-na-primere-sravneniya-nauchnyh-elektronnyh-bibliotek-rgb-i-kiberleninka (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
18. SHamsutdinova T.M. Cognitive model of e-learning trajectory based on digital footprint. Otkrytoe obrazovanie, 2020, no. 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kognitivnaya-model-traektorii-elektronnogo-obucheniya-na-osnove-tsifrovogo-sleda (accessed: 03.02.2021). (In Russ.)
19. YAkovleva E.V., Gol'cova N.V., Vahrameev P.S., Ivanov V.V. A model of vocational guidance and professional self-determination of children of different age groups based on the principles of gamification in the formation of a digital footprint in the system of continuous education. Vestnik CHerepoveckogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, no. 6(99). (In Russ.)
20. Azcona D., Hsiao I.H., Smeaton A.F. Detecting students-at-risk in computer programming classes with learning analytics from students’ digital footprints. User Model User-Adap Inter, 2019, vol. 29, pp. 759-788, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09234-7.
21. Galimova E.G., Konysheva A.V., Kalugina O.A., Sizova Z.M. Digital educational footprint as a way to evaluate the results of students’ learning and cognitive activity in the process of teaching mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2019, vol. 15(8), doi: 10.29333/ejmste/108435.
22. Goroshit M. Academic procrastination and academic performance: An initial basis for intervention. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 2018, vol. 46(2), pp. 131-142, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2016.1198157.
23. Grant N.K., McGrath A.L. Effects of PowerPoint slides on attendance and learning: If you share it, they will (still) come. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. Advance online publication, 2021, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/stl0000241.
24. Koedinger K.R., D'Mello S., McLaughlin E.A., Pardos Z.A., Rosé C.P. Data mining and education. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2015, vol. 6(4), pp. 333-353, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1350.
25. Penteado B.E., Paiva P.M.P., Morettin-Zupelari M., Isotani S., Ferrari D.V. Toward Better Outcomes in Audiology Distance Education: An Educational Data Mining Approach. American Journal of Audiology, 2018, vol. 19, no. 27(3s), pp. 513-525, doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0020.
26. Rosen L.D., Mark Carrier L., Cheever N.A. Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, vol. 29(3), pp. 948-958, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001.
Review
Views:
1801
Email this article 