The rationale for relevance development of substrate-attribute model of information culture in the framework of the philosophy of culture

Introduction. The information society changes many familiar phenomena of traditional society. These include, first of all, culture, which acts as an indicator that civilization is moving to a new stage of development. In the information age, significant changes are taking place in the culture. In the works of scientists, a categorical apparatus is developed that allows describing and studying new phenomena. The category "information culture" is one of such innovations in the scientific literature. However, research shows that a unified approach to understanding the essence of this phenomenon has not yet developed.

In the study of information culture, the issues of its relationship with society and the individual are well developed, and the possible social consequences of its development and implementation in all spheres of human life and activity are presented. However, the weak point or "white spot" remains the study of its nature, essential, attribute, and substrate properties.

The purpose of this article is to substantiate the relevance of developing a substratum-attribute model of information culture within the framework of the philosophy of culture.

Materials and Methods. The main research methods used were analytical review, analysis, grouping, generalization, comparison, and substrate approach.

Results: the analysis of works devoted to the philosophical and cultural research of information culture has shown that researchers of the nature and essence of information culture as a category of cultural philosophy pay insufficient attention to the development of its substratum-attribute model. There are practically no complete system studies that result in the construction of a substratum-attribute model of information culture.

Discussion and Conclusions. The studied models of information culture do not fully reflect its nature, essential features and qualities that allow us to understand the causes and mechanisms of its influence on the course of civilizational, social and anthropological changes. Therefore, the development of a substratum-attribute model of information culture is due to the need to identify the causes of possible changes in the generic qualities of a person that occur under its influence as a socio-cultural phenomenon.

1. Afanas'ev S.V. Information culture: typological analysis. Filosofskaya mysl', 2018, no. 1, pp. 59-70, doi: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.1.21885. Available at: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_21885.html (accessed: 05.03.2020). (In Russ.)

2. Afanas'ev S.V. Information Substratum of Information Culture: Substrate-Attributive Model. Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2018, no. 1, pp. 71-88, doi: 10.7256/2454-0757.2018.1.23916. Available at: http://e-notabene.ru/pfk/article_23916.html (accessed: 05.03.2020). (In Russ.)

3. Vodop'yanova N.A. Information culture as a factor of interaction between the public and the individual: the abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. Stavropol, 2001. 21 p. (In Russ.)

4. Golubeva S.L. Transformation of culture in the system of Internet communications: the abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. St. Petersburg, 2016.28 p. (In Russ.)

5. Ignatov M.A. The phenomenon of alienation of a person in the discourse of informational-network culture: the abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. Belgorod, 2011. 22 p. (In Russ.)

6. Kolin K.K., Ursul A.D. Information and culture. Introduction to Information Cultural Studies. Moscow, Strategicheskie prioritety Publ., 2015. 288 p. (In Russ.)

7. L'vov A.A. Archeology of the subject of the information society: anthropological aspect: the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. St. Petersburg, 2015. 26 p. (In Russ.)

8. Mikerina T.V. Information culture and the crisis of socio-cultural identity in the conditions of globalization: the socio-philosophical analysis: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.11. St. Petersburg, 2010. 23 p. (In Russ.)

9. Muss A.I. Experience of conceptualization of a human model in cognitive science: dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. St. Petersburg, 2018. 254 p. (In Russ.)

10. Pavlov A.V. Philosophy of culture in post-postmodernism: a critical analysis: the dissertation of the doctor of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. Moscow, 2019.28 p. (In Russ.)

11. Polyakova G.V. Information culture in modern society: philosophical aspects: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.11. Moscow, 2015.35 p. (In Russ.)

12. Reutov A.S. Visual researches of modern culture: phenomenological aspect: dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. Nizhny Novgorod, 2018. 35 p. (In Russ.)

13. Sapunova A.A. Technique as anthropological divergence and convergence in an evolutionary context: dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. Moscow, 2019. 24 p. (In Russ.)

14. Strukov D.N. The author's "I" in the culture of the information society: philosophical analysis: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. Stavropol, 2009. 21 p. (In Russ.)

15. Suhorukih A.V. Axiology of innovations in modern educational culture: dissertation abstract of Doctor of Philosophy: 09.00.13. Kursk, 2020. 36 p. (In Russ.)

16. Tujchizoda Nasrullo. Television as a type of screen culture and its role in a transforming society: on the example of Tajik television: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. Dushanbe, 2019. 26 p. (In Russ.)

17. SHipicin A.I. Computer social networks in the context of virtualization of modern culture: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of philosophical sciences: 09.00.13. Volgograd, 2014. 23 p. (In Russ.)

18. Amershi B. Culture, the process of knowledge, perception of the world and emergence of AI. AI and Society, 2020, vol. 35(2), pp. 417-430, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00885-z.

19. Aura E.S. Postmodernism and the Simulacrum of Religion in Universities. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 2016, vol. 15(45), pp.76-95.

20. Baranovas R. Virtuality and the Problem of Agency in Object-Oriented Ontology. Open Philosophy, 2020, vol. 3(1), pp. 233-241.

21. Castells M. Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 2008, vol. 51(1), pp. 5-24, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00005.x.

22. Coeckelbergh M. New Romantic Cyborgs: Romanticism, Information Technology, and the End of the Machine. Reviewed By. Dave Seng. Philosophy in Review, 2018, vol. 38(1), pp. 11-13.

23. Deleuze Gilles. Vom Archiv zum Diagramm. Wöpking J., Christoph E., Schneider B. (eds.) Diagrammatik-Reader. De Gruyter, 2016. Pp. 169-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050093833-025.

24. Drake B., Yuthas K. It'sonly Words – Impacts of Information Technology on Moral Dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 2000, vol. 23(1), pp. 41-59.

25. Gualeni S. De-Roling from Experiences and Identities in Virtual Worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2017, vol. 10(2).

26. Gualeni S. The Experience Machine: Existential Reflections on Virtual Worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2016, vol. 9(3).

27. Heersmink R.A Virtue Epistemology of the Internet: Search Engines, Intellectual Virtues and Education. Social Epistemology, 2018, vol. 32(1), pp. 1-12.

28. Kolin K.K. Humanitarian aspects of information security. Informatics and Applications, 2016, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 111-121, doi: https://doi.org/10.14357/19922264160315.

29. Kopytin A.I. & Gare A. Toward an Ecological Civilization – An Interview with Arran Gare. Ecopoiesis: Eco-Human Theory and Practice, 2020, vol. 1, pp. 1-10.

30. Le cyberspace et le rêve américain: une Magna Carta pour l'ère de la connaissance / Esther Dyson, George Gilder, George Keyworth, Alvin Toffler, Michel Bourdeau & Stéphane Marchand. Cahiers Philosophiques, 2015, vol. 2(141), pp. 111-129.

31. Matthew K. & Bielby J. (eds.) Information Cultures in the Digital Age. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS, 2016.

32. McDonald M, Gough B. & Wearing S. Social Psychology, Consumer Culture and Neoliberalism: A Response to Phelps and White. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 2019, vol. 49(3), pp. 394-400.

33. Nechvatal J. Immersive Ideals / Critical Distances: Study of the Affinity Between Artistic Ideologies in Virtual Reality and Previous Immersive Idioms. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing AG & Co KG, 2010.

34. Rakitov A.I. Higher Education and Artificial Intelligence: Euphoria and alarmism. Higher Education in Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 41-49.

35. Ramirez Erick Jose & La Barge Scott. Real moral problems in the use of virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology, 2018, vol. 4, pp. 249-263.

36. Stapleton L. Zarathustra and Beyond: Exploring Culture and Values Online. AI and Society, 2013, vol. 28(1), pp. 95-105.

37. Ursul A.D. Science And Education In the Conditions of Formation of the Global World. Wisdom, 2019, vol. 13(2), pp. 127-134.

38. Vella D. & Gualeni S. Virtual Subjectivity: Existence and Projectuality in Virtual Worlds. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 2019, vol. 23(2), pp. 115-136.

39. Wagoner B., Jensen E. Culture and Social Change: Transforming Societies Through the Power of Ideas. NC: Information Age Publishing, 2012. 358 p.

40. Wallace R. Culture and the Trajectories of Developmental Pathology: Insights From Control and Information Theories. Acta Biotheoretica, 2018, vol. 66(2), pp. 79-112.

41. Watts P. Roland Barthes' Cinema / Edited by D. Andrew, Y. Citton, V. Debaene, and S. D. Iorio. Oxford University Press, 2016. 216 p.

42. Wittkower D. (ed.) 2019 Computer Ethics – Philosophical Enquiry (CEPE) Proceedings. Available at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cepe_proceedings/ (accessed: 05.03.2020).