Framework approach in technology education
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2020-8-2-2
Abstract
Introduction. The use of the frame approach in modern constructions of the educational process allows you to optimize energy consumption in the system of communication and learning, achieving an acceptable learning intensity. The logic of presentation of educational material when using the frame approach most fully corresponds to and optimizes the algorithms of the primary stages of filling in knowledge bases.
Materials and methods. The experimental study was conducted at the Department of technology, fine arts and design of the Institute of pedagogy and psychology of Petrozavodsk state University. The following research methods were used: observation, systematization, analysis and synthesis, generalization and comparison. Scientific publications in periodicals and methodological materials on the use of the frame approach developed at universities were used as informative sources.
Results. The article considers some features and problems of presenting educational information in the form of: frame-frames (reference notes), frame-schemes and frame-algorithms used, for example, in the process of studying technological operations: drilling, turning, filing, when performing course design tasks, organizing thematic conferences, etc.the use of the frame approach in professional training in higher education in pedagogical and engineering areas and specialties becomes Especially relevant.
Discussion and Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, methodological recommendations for using the frame approach in the system of technological education are presented. Frame organization of all aspects of the learning process largely solves the problem of intensification of the learning process, including attracting the potential of fractal theory and practice of building innovative learning technologies.
About the Authors
V. D. LobashevRussian Federation
Lobashev Valery Danilovich – candidate of pedagogical Sciences, associate Professor, associate Professor of the Department of economic theory and management of the Institute of economics and law
Petrozavodsk
A. A. Talykh
Russian Federation
Talykh Aleksey Aleksandrovich, candidate of pedagogical Sciences, associate Professor, associate Professor of the Department of technology, fine arts and design of the Institute of pedagogy and psychology
Petrozavodsk
References
1. Abramyan S.I., Fedotov A.A. Forms of human potential. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 2019, no. 10-2(37), pp. 27-30. (In Russ.)
2. Avdonina N.S. Liberal arts educational model: content and methods. Cennosti i smysly, 2017, no. 4(50), pp. 98-105. (In Russ.)
3. Averkin V.N., Batyrshin I.Z., Blishun A.F., Silov V.B., Tarasov V.B. Fuzzy sets in control models and artificial intelligence / edited by D.A. Pospelov. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986. 312 p. (In Russ.)
4. Avilkina S.V., Bakuleva M.A., Klejnosova N.P. A mathematical model for the formation of a basic statistical sample to assess the level of development of digital competencies of teachers. Statistika i ekonomika, 2018, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 26-35. (In Russ.)
5. Antonova O.S. Active methods of forming communicative competence using frames. Trudy BGTU. Seriya 6: Istoriya, filosofiya, 2016, no. 5, pp. 214-217. (In Russ.)
6. Arpent'eva M.R. Problems of mediation of education and the destruction of teacher-student relations. Nauka i perspektivy. Elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal «Nauka i perspektivy», 2017, no. 2, pp. 7-14. (In Russ.)
7. Atanov G.A., Loktyushin V.V. The frame organization of knowledge in an intellectually educational system. Obrazovatel'nye tekhnologii i obshchestvo, 2001, vol.1, no. 4, pp. 137-149. (In Russ.)
8. Afon'kina YU.A., Kuz'micheva T.V. Categorization of the concept of "human potential" in the context of the transformation of vocational education. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 2018, no. 60-4, pp. 31-34. (In Russ.)
9. Barkova T.P. The frame-based organization of educational material in the process of teaching Russian as a foreign language. Nauchno-metodicheskij elektronnyj zhurnal «Koncept», 2016, vol. 42, pp. 105-114. Available at: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/56963.htm (accessed: 12.12.2019). (In Russ.)
10. Bazyleva M. Human potential and the problems of its transformation into human capital. Nauka i innovacii, 2018, no. 1(179), pp. 15-18. (In Russ.)
11. Blohin A.L. The development of higher education as a factor in the formation of human capital. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta (Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin), 2018, vol. 3(192), pp. 74-78. (In Russ.)
12. Bogdanova E.A. Knowledge Engineering: A Study Guide. Samara, PGUTI Publ., 2016. 101 p. (In Russ.)
13. Bondar' M.A. Using the frame approach in mathematics as a condition for the development of cognitive universal educational actions of schoolchildren. Molodoj uchyonyj, 2017, no. 2, pp. 571-573. (In Russ.)
14. Bulatickij D.I. Knowledge management in the organization’s quality management system: dissertation for the degree of candidate of technical sciences: 05.02.23. Bryansk, 2011. 194 p. (In Russ.)
15. Bulatova A.V. The mechanism of human capital management. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika, 2018, no. 10-1, pp. 28-31. (In Russ.)
16. Gavrilova T.A., Horoshevskij V.F. Knowledge bases of intelligent systems. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002. 394 p. (In Russ.)
17. Dneprovskaya N.V. Assessment of the readiness of Russian higher education for the digital economy. Statistika i ekonomika, 2018, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 16-24. (In Russ.)
18. Egorov V.K. Features of the conditions for the formation of the human potential of a new generation in Russia. Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz, 2017, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 100-113, doi: 10.15838/esc/2017.3.51.5. (In Russ.)
19. ZHiharev A.G. A formalized graphoanalytic representation of organizational knowledge: dissertation for the degree of candidate of technical sciences: 05.13.17. Belgorod, 2013. 210 p. (In Russ.)
20. Zade L. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to decision making. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1976. 167 p. (In Russ.)
21. Zeer E.F., Pavlova A.M., Symanyuk E.E. Modernization of vocational education: competency-based approach: a training manual. Moscow, Moskovskij psihologo-social'nyj institute Publ., 2005. 216 p. (In Russ.)
22. Zolotuhin V.M., Porhachev V.N. Formation and disclosure of human potential in the Russian socio-cultural space. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2019, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145-150, doi: 10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-2-145-150. (In Russ.)
23. Ivanova T.V., Habake M.V. The relationship of "human resources" and "human potential". Oeconomia et Jus, 2017, no. 1, pp. 10-13. (In Russ.)
24. Kozhanov D.A. The frame structure of the organization of knowledge in the scientific picture. Filologiya i chelovek, 2014, no. 1, pp. 11-15. (In Russ.)
25. Korotkova T.L. Master class “place of the project manager in the digital economy”. Ekonomicheskie i social'no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2018, no. 1(17), pp. 19-26. (In Russ.)
26. Kolesnikova L.G. Training university students for management as a type of professional activity: the dissertation of the candidate of pedagogical sciences: 13.00.08. Chelyabinsk, 2007.198 p. (In Russ.)
27. Lozinskaya A.M., SHamalo T.N. Structuring the content of education in modular pedagogical technology. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 2010, no. 4, pp. 45-52. (In Russ.)
28. Lobashev V.D., Lobashev I.V. Functions and procedures of cognitive processes in vocational education. Petrozavodsk, PetrGU Publ., 2018. 120 p. (In Russ.)
29. Lobashev V.D., Lobashev I.V. Motivation in the processes of vocational education. LAP LAMBERT Academic Pudlishing, 2012.543 p. (In Russ.)
30. Lyutikova L.A. Modeling and minimization of knowledge systems in terms of multi-valued predicate logic: dissertation for the degree of candidate of physical and mathematical sciences: 05.13.18. Nalchik, 2008.202 p. (In Russ.)
31. Mokrova M.YU., Lipatova L.N. Modern trends in the development of the human potential of Russia. Rossiya: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 317-322. (In Russ.)
32. Mokronosov A.G., Krutin YU.V. Human capital or human potential. Idei i idealy, 2017, no. 2(32), vol. 2, pp. 80-90. (In Russ.)
33. Prishlyak E.A., Rad'ko S.G. The study of factors affecting the formation of human capital in the Russian Federation. Upravlencheskie nauki, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 94-105. (In Russ.)
34. Romanova N.P. Human Resource Management as a Form of Using Human Potential. Vestnik Zabajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 88-95. (In Russ.)
35. Sinicyna V.V. Formation and development of the concept of human potential. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta, 2019, no. 9(6), pp. 150-155. (In Russ.)
36. Smakotina N.L. Transformation of education in the context of globalization: opportunities and risks. Cennosti i smysly, 2017, no. 6(52), pp. 21-28. (In Russ.)
37. Soshnikov D.V. Methods and means of building distributed intelligent systems based on the production-frame representation of knowledge: dissertation for the degree of candidate of physical and mathematical sciences: 05.13.11. Moscow, 2002. 212 p. (In Russ.)
38. Suhanosova S.V. Theory of frames: the possibility of studying everyday life. CHelovek v mire kul'tury, 2012, no. 3, pp. 29-38. (In Russ.)
39. Talyh A.A. Some methodological approaches to the process of continuous ethnocultural and technological education. Sovremennye podhody v obrazovanii: iskusstvo, tekhnologiya, dizajn. Petrozavodsk, PetrGU Publ., 2018. Pp. 64-71. (In Russ.)
40. Tatt U. Graph Theory. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1988.442 p. (In Russ.)
41. Terekhov S.V. Frame approach: philosophical and methodological aspect. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya, 2014, no. 6, pp. 53-71. (In Russ.)
42. Terpak M.A. The frame model as a way of structuring and analyzing concepts. Vestnik SamGU, 2006, no. 5/1(45), pp. 132-137. (In Russ.)
43. Tomashevskij S.V. Generalized Riesz frames and systems. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Matematika, informatika, fizika, 2014, no. 4, pp. 7-13. (In Russ.)
44. Urazova M.B., Eshpulatov SH.N. Frame technology as a way of forming independent thinking of students of pedagogical universities. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2011, no. 4, pp. 163-170. (In Russ.)
45. Hadzhalova H.M., Abdulmanapov S.G. The educational component of the human potential of the population of the subjects of the North-Caucasian Federal District. UEPS: upravlenie, ekonomika, politika, sociologiya, 2019, no. 2, pp. 9-22. (In Russ.)
46. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2003, vol. 16, no. 1.
47. Andriesson D. Implementing the KPMG Value Explorer. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2005, no. 6, pp. 474-488.
48. Conceicao P., Heitor M. On the role of the university in the knowledge economy. Science and Public Policy, 1999, vol. 26, no. 1.
49. Deary I. Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001. P. 74.
50. Fleker J., Papouschek U., Gavroglou S. New forms of work organization and flexibility in the knowledge-based society. The transformation of work in a global economy: towards a conceptual framework. Leuven, HIVA, 2006. Pp. 46-62.
51. Human Development Report, 1998. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998.
52. Carpenter V. A case study of issues of strategy implementation in internationalization of higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 2003, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 4-18.
53. Mincer J. The Production of Human Capital and The Lifecycle of Earnings: Variations on a Theme. Working Paper of the NBER, 1994, no. 4838.
54. Pedrini M. Human capital convergences in intellectual capital and sustainability reports. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 346-366.
55. Phillips J.J. Investing in Your Company's Human Capital: Strategies How to Avoid Spending Too Little – or Too Much. New York, AMACOM, 2005. 290 p.
56. Thurow L. Investment in Human Capital. Belmont, 1970.
57. Teece David J. Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, strategic, a policy dimensions. Oxford, 2002.
58. Schuller T. The Complementary Roles of Human and Social Capital. Paper presented for an international symposium on The Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-Being, HRD Canada and the OECD, March 19-21, 2000. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/1825424.pdf (accessed: 12.12.2019).
59. Schwab K. (ed.) The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-20013. Geneva. World Economic Forum. 2012. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2012-13.pdf (accessed: 12.12.2019).
60. Tomes N., Becker G. Human capital and the rise and fall of families. Journal of human resources, 1990, no. 4.
61. Bonds N., Dragonetti N.C., Jaconsen C., Roos G. The knowledge toolbox: a review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal, 1999, vol. 17(4), pp. 391-402.