PREPARATION OF UNDERGRADUATES FOR THE FORMATION OF STUDENT TEAMS FOR PROJECT ACTIVITIES
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2020-8-1-1
Abstract
Introduction. The problem of creating pedagogical conditions for the formation of a team building system is one of the relevant areas in modern education. This issue is especially relevant in modern socio-economic conditions that require teamwork to create new technologies.
Materials and methods. As the main methods, we used the analysis of sources on the studied problem, including normative documents, scientific articles on the research topic, as well as generalization and systematization of the data obtained. An expert assessment of the ability of graduate students to organize and manage teams was carried out.
Results. Graduate students in the learning process when performing practice-oriented tasks performed various team roles. In the process of practical training in an educational organization, students created teams of students for project activities. As a result of mathematical and statistical processing of the obtained results of the expert assessment according to the criteria of team building using the Chi-square at p <0.01 and p <0.05, the following differences were revealed. Statistically significant differences were identified by the criteria of the ability to distribute social roles, powers between team members and the ability to ensure team cohesion. Only satisfaction from group membership and participation in the achievement of a common goal was not defined as significantly different. The latter result means that a more significant sample of students is needed in a further study, or an adjustment of the process of teaching graduate students to the principles of team building in matters of joint research is required.
Discussion and Conclusions. The reliability of the effectiveness of the implementation of vocational training in the system of practice-oriented tasks for teaching students the principles of team building has been established. As a result, students of pedagogical magistracy formed the skills of team building and mastery of the technology of forming teams of students for project activities.
Materials and methods. As the main methods, we used the analysis of sources on the studied problem, including normative documents, scientific articles on the research topic, as well as generalization and systematization of the data obtained. An expert assessment of the ability of graduate students to organize and manage teams was carried out.
Results. Graduate students in the learning process when performing practice-oriented tasks performed various team roles. In the process of practical training in an educational organization, students created teams of students for project activities. As a result of mathematical and statistical processing of the obtained results of the expert assessment according to the criteria of team building using the Chi-square at p <0.01 and p <0.05, the following differences were revealed. Statistically significant differences were identified by the criteria of the ability to distribute social roles, powers between team members and the ability to ensure team cohesion. Only satisfaction from group membership and participation in the achievement of a common goal was not defined as significantly different. The latter result means that a more significant sample of students is needed in a further study, or an adjustment of the process of teaching graduate students to the principles of team building in matters of joint research is required.
Discussion and Conclusions. The reliability of the effectiveness of the implementation of vocational training in the system of practice-oriented tasks for teaching students the principles of team building has been established. As a result, students of pedagogical magistracy formed the skills of team building and mastery of the technology of forming teams of students for project activities.
About the Authors
A. A. Miroshnichenko
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Glazov Pedagogical Institute named after V.G. Korolenko
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
Glazov
D. R. Merzlyakova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Udmurt State University"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor of the Department of Life Safety
Izhevsk
References
1. Trujillo J.P, Simanova I., Bekkering H., Özyürek A. Communicative intent modulates production and comprehension of actions and gestures: A Kinect study. Cognition, 2018, no. 180, pp. 38-51.
2. Auer M.A. International Society for Engineering Education (IGIP) and new challenges in engineering education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2014, no. 6, pp. 28-33. (In Russ.)
3. Verma D. Communication: A Necessary Leadership Skill. Management Guru: Journal of Management Research, 2013, no. 2, pp. 95-101.
4. Belbin R. Meredit. Management teams. Secrets of success and causes of failure: translation from English. Moscow, HIPPO, 2003.315 p. (In Russ.)
5. Vries R.E. de, Bakker-Pieper A., Oostenveld W. Leadership = Communication? The Relations of Leaders' Communication Styles with Leadership Styles, Knowledge Sharing and Leadership Outcomes. Journal of business and psychology, 2010, no. 3(25), pp. 367-380. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-009-9140-2.
6. Bolotova I.S., Bosyh N.B. Team building as the main method of innovative development of personnel. Innovacionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya, 2017, no. 5(23), pp. 11-16. (In Russ.)
7. Gadzhiev A.G., Mihalyova M.V. The role of the leader of innovation in creating a new technological structure. Innovacionnoe razvitie Rossijskoj ekonomiki: materialy X Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii: v 5 tomah. Tom. 1. Innovacii i rossijskaya ekonomika v kontekste global'nyh ekonomicheskih processov. Moscow, 2017. Pp. 82-85. (In Russ.)
8. Dorozhkov N.D. Features of the construction and interaction of the innovation project team. Biznes-obrazovanie v ekonomike znanij, 2017, no. 2(7), pp. 43-47. (In Russ.)
9. Zinkevich-Evstigneeva T.D., Frolov D.F., Grabenko T.M. Theory and practice of team building. Modern technology for creating teams. St. Petersburg, Rech' Publ., 2004.304 p.
10. Innovative management. Moscow, Alpina Publisher, 2017.206 p. (In Russ.)
11. Kolominskij YA.L. Social psychology of relationships in small groups: a manual for psychologists, educators, sociologists. Moscow, 2010. 550 p. (In Russ.)
12. Makarov A.M. Self-organization of the strategic activity of an enterprise: opportunities and limitations. Konvergenciya v sfere nauchnoj deyatel'nosti: problemy, vozmozhnosti, perspektivy: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii / pod red. A.M. Makarova. Izhevsk, 2018. Pp. 407-410. (In Russ.)
13. Merzlyakova G.V., Dan'shina S.A. Interdisciplinary studies of the problems of organizing the work of Russian youth. Konvergenciya v sfere nauchnoj deyatel'nosti: problemy, vozmozhnosti, perspektivy: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii / pod red. A.M. Makarova. Izhevsk, 2018. Pp. 278-282. (In Russ.)
14. Merzlyakova G.V., Makarov A.M. Center for the Development of Advanced Technologies in the Economy of the Udmurt Republic. Akkreditaciya v obrazovanii, 2018, no. 1(101), pp. 36-37. (In Russ.)
15. Miroshnichenko A.A., Merzlyakova D.R. Regional strategy for maintaining and strengthening the psychological health of participants in educational relations. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya, 2017, no. 1, pp. 44-53. (In Russ.)
16. Nagovicyn R.S., Maksimov YU.G., Miroshnichenko A.A., Senator S.YU. The implementation of the didactic model of preparing students for innovation in the process of continuing education of a future teacher. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2017, no. 5, pp. 7-24. (In Russ.)
17. Rethinking engineering education. CDIO / E.F. Crowley [et al.]; translation from English S. Rybushkina; edited by A. Chuchalin. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2015. 504 p. (In Russ.)
18. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated November 21, 2014 No. 1505 “On approval of the federal state educational standard of higher education in the field of training 04.04.01 Pedagogical education (master's level)” (registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on December 19, 2014 No. 35263). Available at: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/fgosvom/440401.pdf (accessed: 01.02.2020). (In Russ.)
19. Romanchenko S.V. Innovations, innovations, innovations: definitions and essence. Molodoj uchenyj, 2012, no. 4, pp. 166-168. (In Russ.)
20. Travin V.V., Dyatlov V.A. Enterprise personnel management. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2008.272 p. (In Russ.)
21. Homutskij D.YU., Aliev I.G. Formation of competencies of an effective leader of teams working in the format of open innovation. Iniciativy XXI veka, 2014, no. 2, pp. 19-21. (In Russ.)
22. Castelli P., Wan Abdul Rahman W.A. The impact of empathy on leadership effectiveness among business leaders in the United States and Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 2013, no. 3, pp. 83-97.
23. Greene J.O., Burleson B.R. (eds.) Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2003. 1032 p.
24. Hodges S.D., Klein K.J. Regulating the costs of empathy: the price of being human. Journal of Socio-Economics, 2001, no. 30, pp. 437-452.
25. Luthra A., Dahiya R. Effective Leadership is all About Communicating Effectively: Connecting Leadership and Communication. International Journal of Management & Business Studies, 2015, no. 3(5), pp.43-48.
26. Luthra A., Singh K. Organizational Communication and Management Effectiveness: An analytical Study at Various Managerial Levels. International Journal of Management & Business Studies, 2015, no. 5, pp. 59-66.
27. Mehrabian A. Evidence bearing on the affiliative tendency (MAFF) and sensitivity to rejection (MSR) scales. Current Psychology, 1994, no. 13, pp. 97-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686794.
28. Mehrabian A., Epstein N. A Measure of Emotional Empathy. Journal of Personality, 2006, no. 40, pp. 525-543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x.
29. Steinmann B., Ötting S. K., Maier G. W. Need for Affiliation as a Motivational Add-On for Leadership Behaviors and Managerial Success. Frontiers in psychology, 2016, no. 7, p. 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01972.
30. Trujillo J.P, Simanova I., Bekkering H., Özyürek A. Communicative intent modulates production and comprehension of actions and gestures: A Kinect study. Cognition, 2018, no. 180, pp. 38-51.
31. Verma D. Communication: A Necessary Leadership Skill. Management Guru: Journal of Management Research, 2013, no. 2, pp. 95-101.
32. Vries R.E. de, Bakker-Pieper A., Oostenveld W. Leadership = Communication? The Relations of Leaders' Communication Styles with Leadership Styles, Knowledge Sharing and Leadership Outcomes. Journal of business and psychology, 2010, no. 3(25), pp. 367-380. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-009-9140-2.
Review
Views:
846
Email this article 