Preview

Vestnik of Minin University

Advanced search

Diagnostics of the education quality in the higher educational institution

https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2019-7-3-4

Abstract

Introduction: the problem of diagnostics of the quality of education at a higher education institution is becoming increasingly relevant in the conditions of the need to fulfill the criteria for the effectiveness of higher education institutions, the introduction of new generation standards in higher education institutions and the modernization of the educational program management system. Diagnostics of the quality of education is considered as an important process that ensures a steady position of the university in the educational services market, the  growth of indicators for the admission campaign,  the increase of reputational capital. Diagnostics of the quality of education makes it possible to identify significant factors in determining the prospects for the development of a university, having a significant impact on the performance indicators of a university and characterizing the results achieved and the resources used.

Materials and Methods: the article discusses the system for the quality of education evaluation at Minin University, it describes its key components, reveals the elements of the diagnostic complex and their systemic interconnection. The characteristics of the elements of the diagnostic complex describes in detail the issue of improving the efficiency of the university in terms of the implementation of the management model of the main professional educational programs, the description of the diagnostic procedure for each category of participants in the educational process is presented.

Results: the author describes the methodology and the main stages of diagnosing the quality of education at the university using the example of  Minin University, gives integrated assessment criteria and their relationship with other elements of the monitoring system and evaluating the quality of education at the university, lists the effects of introducing a comprehensive system for diagnosing the quality of educational activities.

Discussion and Conclusions: in the final part of the article, the possibilities of further improving the system of assessment of the quality of education in the educational system of higher education are considered. Arguments about the need to further expand the range of issues raised by the diagnostic process are made; the ratio of the existing positions of the university to the requirements of the legislation is made.

 

About the Author

E. V. Myalkina
Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University (Minin University)
Russian Federation

Myalkina Elena Vasilievna – candidate of pedagogical sciences, pro-rector for economics and development 

Nizhny Novgorod



References

1. Alekseeva L.P., SHablygina N.S., Ageeva L.N. Improving the qualifications of university teachers in Russia in the context of higher education reform. Moscow, 2002. 48 p. (Content, forms and methods of teaching in higher education: Analytical reviews on the main directions of development of higher education) / NIIWO; Issue 9). (In Russ.)

2. Bolotov V.A. On the construction of a nationwide system for assessing the quality of education. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2005, no. 1, pp. 5-10. (In Russ.)

3. Bordovskaya N.V., Titova E.V. Methods of assessing the quality of activities of university teachers: guidelines. St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk, 2003. 72 p. (In Russ.)

4. Bordovskij G.A., Nesterov A.A., Trapicyn S.YU. Quality management of the educational process. St. Petersburg, Publisher RGPU named after A.I. Herzen, 2001. 359 p. (In Russ.)

5. Vishtak O.V. Motivational preferences of applicants and students. Socis, 2003, no. 2, pp. 135-138. (In Russ.)

6. Volkov A. Set trends. Rektor vuza, 2006, no. 3, pp. 13-21. (In Russ.)

7. Glikman I.Z. Students evaluate the quality of teaching. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya, 2003, no. 12, pp. 48-50. (In Russ.)

8. GOST R ISO 9001-2001. Quality management systems. Requirements. Moscow, Standardinform Publ., 2001. 21 p. (In Russ.)

9. GOST R ISO 9004-2001. Quality management systems. Recommendations for improvement. Moscow, Standardinform Publ., 2001. 45 p. (In Russ.)

10. Kozlov V.N., Rudskoj A.I., CHernen'kaya L.V. Foreign quality management systems of higher professional education. Moscow, 2009. 56 p. (Problems of foreign higher education: analytical reviews on the main directions of development of higher education / FIRO; vol. 10). (In Russ.)

11. Korotkov E.M. Quality management education. Moscow, Academic project: World Publ., 2006. 320 p. (In Russ.)

12. Krechetnikov K.G. Designing a creative educational environment based on information technology at the university. Moscow, Goskorotsentr Publ., 2002. 296 p. (In Russ.)

13. Kulyutkin YU. Educational environment and personal development. Novye znaniya, 2001, no. 1, pp. 6-7. (In Russ.)

14. Lopes Ignasio Gonsales. The views of students on the quality of academic training: the results of foreign studies. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya, 2006, no. 5, pp. 20-25. (In Russ.)

15. Maslak A.A. Measurement of latent variables in socio-economic systems: monograph. Slavyansk-on Kuban, Publishing center SGPI, 2006. 333 p. (In Russ.)

16. Matyuhin V.A. Evaluation of teaching staff in US universities. Moscow, NIIVO Publ., 1992. 46 p. (In Russ.)

17. Meshkova T.A. The quality of teaching as an integral part of the quality culture in the university. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2010, no. 3, pp. 115-134. (In Russ.)

18. Modernization of Russian education: documents and materials / Editor E.D. Dneprov. Moscow, State University Higher School of Economics Publ., 2002. 332 p. (In Russ.)

19. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 04.10.2000 no. 751 "On the national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation". Rossijskaya gazeta, 2000, no. 196. (In Russ.)

20. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of 11.04.2017 No. 431 “On the procedure for forming and maintaining a list of organizations conducting professional public accreditation of basic professional educational programs, basic vocational training programs and (or) additional professional programs”. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/71652692/ (accessed: 19.05.2019). (In Russ.)

21. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 24.05.2013 No. 438 “On the state information system "Register of organizations conducting educational activities on state-accredited educational programs"”. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/70384892/ (accessed: 19.05.2019). (In Russ.)

22. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 26, 2017 No. 1642 “On Approval of the State Program of the Russian Federation "Development of Education"”. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71748426/ (accessed: 19.05.2019). (In Russ.)

23. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 26.12.2017 No. 1642 (as amended on 04.10.2018) “On approval of the state program of the Russian Federation "Development of Education"”. Available at: https://rulaws.ru/goverment/Postanovlenie-Pravitelstva-RF-ot-26.12.2017-N-1642/ (accessed: 19.05.2019). (In Russ.)

24. Priority project "Development of the export potential of the Russian education system". Available at: http://government.ru/projects/selection/653/ (accessed: 19.05.2019). (In Russ.)

25. Romankova L.I., Selyanskaya G.N. Monitoring the staff potential of the university. Moscow, 2004. 56 p. (New information technologies in education: Analytical reviews on the main directions of the development of higher education / NIIVO; Vyp. 3). (In Russ.)

26. Rubin YU.B. Modern education: quality, standards, tools: monograph. Moscow, Market DS Publ., 2009. 336 p. (In Russ.)

27. Sidorov P.I., Vasil'ev E.YU. System monitoring of the educational environment: monograph. Arkhangelsk, Northern State Medical University Publ., 2007. 338 p. (In Russ.)

28. Sidorov P.I., Novikova I.A. Mental medicine: methodology and practice. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012. 693 p. (In Russ.)

29. Sobolev B.C., Stepanov S.A. The concept, model and criteria for the effectiveness of the internal university quality management system of higher professional education. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2004, no. 2(30), pp. 102-110. (In Russ.)

30. Spasskij A.S. The structure of university student's satisfaction with study. Innovacii v obrazovanii, 2002, no. 1, pp. 50-59. (In Russ.)

31. Terminological dictionary in the field of quality management of higher and secondary vocational education / project leader S.A.Stepanov. St. Petersburg, Federal Agency for Education of the Russian Federation Publ., SPbSETU Publ., MISIS Publ., MSTU "Stankin" Publ., 2005. 78 p. (In Russ.)

32. Presidential Decree of May 26, 2009 No. 599 "On measures to improve higher legal education in the Russian Federation". Available at: https://rg.ru/2009/05/29/uristy-dok.html (accessed: 22.05.2019). (In Russ.)

33. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2012 No. 599 “On Measures for Implementing State Policy in the Field of Education and Science”. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/70170946/ (accessed: 22.05.2019). (In Russ.)

34. Quality management of higher education: theory, methodology, organization, practice: a collective scientific monograph / under the editorship of A.I.Subetto. St. Petersburg, Smolny Institute of the Russian Academy of Education Publ., Kostroma, Kostroma State University Publ., 2005. (In Russ.)

35. Federal Law of December 19, 2012 No. 273-FZ “On Education in the Russian Federation”. Available at: http://zakon-ob-obrazovanii.ru/ (accessed: 19.05.2019). (In Russ.)

36. Fokin YU.G. Teaching and education in higher education: Methodology, goals and content, creativity: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Moscow, Academy Publ., 2002. 224 p. (In Russ.)

37. Ananiadou K., Claro M. 21st Century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. 2009. Vol. 41. 33 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154.

38. Blanco Ramirez G. International accreditation as global position taking: An empirical exploration of U.S. accreditation in Mexico. Higher Education, 2015, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 361-374. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9780-7.

39. Bramley P., Newby A.C. The Evaluation Of Training Part I: Clarifying The Concept. Journal of European & Industrial Training, 1984, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 10-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb014201.

40. Faganel A., Dolinšek S. Quality Management Systems in Higher Education. Available at: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/961-6486-71-3/245-252.pdf (accessed: 05.05.2019).

41. Foxon M. Evaluation of training and development programs: A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 1989, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 89-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2340.

42. Grundy T. Strategy Implementation through Management. Thoro-good Publishing Ltd, 2003. 119 p.

43. Higher Education that Works Involving Employers in Quality Assurance. Available at: https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/about-us/higher-education-that-works-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=e9e2f581_10 (accessed: 19.05.2019).

44. Irvin Derek. The Role of Tangible vs. Intangible Rewards in Strategic Recognition. CoM, MIT, 2010. Available at: https://www.recognizethisblog.com/2009/05/the-role-of-tangible-vs-intangible-rewards-in-strategic-recognition/ (accessed: 05.05.2019).

45. March J.G. Research on organizations: Hopes for the past and lessons from the future. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier, 1999, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 69-83.

46. Markova S.M., Sedykh E.P., Tsyplakova S.A., Polunin V.Y. Perspective trends of development of professional pedagogics as a science. Popkova E. (eds) The Impact of Information on Modern Humans. HOSMC 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 622. Springer, Cham, 2018. Pp. 129-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75383-6_17.

47. Martin M., Parikh S. Quality management in higher education: developments and drivers: results from an international survey. UNESCO, 2017. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260226 (accessed: 05.05.2019)

48. Seyfried M., Pohlenz P. Assessing quality assurance in higher education: quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness. European Journal of Higher Education, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 258-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474777.

49. Smidt H. European quality assurance – A European higher education area success story [overview paper]. Curaj A., Matei L., Pricopie R., Salmi J., Scott P. (eds) The European Higher Education Area. Springer, Cham, 2015. Pp. 525-637. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_40.

50. Turner R. The Handbook of Project-Based Management: Leading Strategic Change in Organization. McGraw-Hill, 2009. 452 p.

51. Vaganova O.I., Kamenez N.V., Vinnikova I.S., Vovk E.V., Smirnova Z.V., Maseleno A. Possibilities of information technologies to increase quality of educational services in Russia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 2018, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 4096-4102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.18637.

52. Yashkova E.V., Sineva N.L., Islamova G.I. Influence of Innovative and creative managerial qualities on the decision-making process in the new economic realities. Perspectives of Science & Education, 2018, vol. 3(33), pp. 79-82. Available at: https://pnojournal.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/pdf_180313.pdf (accessed: 05.05.2019).


Review

Views: 1615


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-1281 (Online)