<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mininuniver</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Мининского университета</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik of Minin University</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2307-1281</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26795/2307-1281-2017-3-18</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mininuniver-644</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ ФИЛОСОФИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>УЧЕНИЕ СВЯТОГО ВАСИЛИЯ ВЕЛИКОГО О РАЗЛИЧИИ МЕЖДУ СУЩНОСТЬЮ И ЭНЕРГИЯМИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE DOCTRINE OF SAINT BASIL THE GREAT'S ABOUT DISTINCTION BETWEEN ESSENCE AND ENERGY</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Воробьев</surname><given-names>Д. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Vorobiov</surname><given-names>D. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Воробьев Дмитрий Валерьевич – доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры философии и общественных наук</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vorobyov Dmitriy Valerevich - Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Нижегородский государственный педагогический университет имени Козьмы Минина (Мининский университет)</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Minin Nizhny Novgorod Statе Pedagogical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>10</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>18</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Воробьев Д.В., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Воробьев Д.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Vorobiov D.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.minin-vestnik.ru/jour/article/view/644">https://www.minin-vestnik.ru/jour/article/view/644</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье исследуется учение св. Василия Великого о различии между сущностью и Божьими энергиями, возникшее в ходе его многолетней борьбы с ересью ариан, основной богословский принцип которых сводился к тому, что Бог-Сын не рожден, а лишь сотворён Богом-Отцом.  Бог-Сын есть первородная, но все-таки  тварь, и, следовательно, не есть Бог. Учение св. Василия возникает, строго говоря, как реакция на ересь Евномия, одного из наиболее радикальных последователей Ария. Согласно Евномию, Сын ни в чем не подобен Отцу и, следовательно, не подобен по сущности. Бог есть всецело познаваемый и абсолютно прост. Чтобы «примирить» абсолютную непознаваемость Бога с Его познаваемостью, сложность и множественность Бога с абсолютной Его простотой, св. Василий выделяет два состояния существования Бога, а именно: существование «в сущности» и существование «вне сущности», отделяя, таким образом, Божью сущность от Его многочисленных действий и свойств, под которыми он понимает энергии. Бог всецело непознаваемый по своей сущности, становится познаваемым по Своим многочисленным действиям и энергиям. Бог абсолютно прост по своей сущности, но сложен и многообразен по Своим многочисленным действиям.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The doctrine Saint Basil the Great's about distinction between God's essence and God's energy which has arisen in the course of long-term fight of Saint Basil against the heresy of Arius is researched in this article. The basic principle of the heresy of Arius is that God the Son is not born, but only created by God the Father. God the Son is the original creation, and, therefore, there is not God. The doctrine Saint Basil the Great's arises, strictly speaking, as reaction to heresy of Evnomy who was the most radical follower of Arius. According to Evnomy, the Son isn't similar in anything to the Father and, therefore, the essence of the Son isn't similar to essence of God Father. God is entirely known and there is absolutely simple. To connect absolute not cognoscibility of God to cognoscibility of God, complexity and plurality of God to absolute simplicity of God, Saint Basil allocates two conditions of existence of God, namely: existence "in essence" and existence "out of essence". Saint Basil separates God's essence from God's numerous actions and properties as which he understands energy. God's essence is entirely not learned, but God is learned on the numerous actions and energy.  God's essence is absolutely simple, but God is difficult and diverse on the numerous actions.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Бог-Отец</kwd><kwd>Бог-Сын</kwd><kwd>ипостась</kwd><kwd>сущность</kwd><kwd>энергия</kwd><kwd>рождение</kwd><kwd>сотворение</kwd><kwd>тварь</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>God the Father</kwd><kwd>God the Son</kwd><kwd>hypostasis</kwd><kwd>essence</kwd><kwd>energy</kwd><kwd>birth</kwd><kwd>creation</kwd><kwd>creature</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Антропология восточно-христианской богословской мысли. СПб.: Никея, 2009. Т. 1. 672 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anthropology of Eastern Christian theological thought. St. Petersburg, Nikea Publ., 2009, t. 1, 672 c. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Болотов В.В. Лекции по истории древней Церкви. Минск: Харвест, 2008. Т. 3., Т. 4. 767 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bolotov V.V. Lectures on the history of the ancient Church. Minsk, Kharvest, 2008, t. 3, t. 4. 767 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бриллиантов А.И. Лекции по истории древней Церкви. СПб.: «Издательство Олега Абышко», 2013. 464 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brilliantov A.I. Lectures on the history of the ancient Church. St. Petersburg, "Publishing house of Oleg Abyshko", 2013. 464 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Василий Великий. Против Евномия // Творения: в 3-х томах. М.: Сибирская Благозвонница, 2008. Т. 1. 1136 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vasilij Velikij. Against Eunomius.  Tvorenija: v 3-h tomah [Creations: in 3 volumes]. Moscow, Siberian Blagozvonitsa, 2008, t. 1, 1136 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Василий Великий. К Амфилохию Иконийскому // Творения: в 3-х томах. М.: Сибирская Благозвонница, 2012. Т 2. 1232 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vasilij Velikij. To Amphilochius of Iconium. Tvorenija: v 3-h tomah [Creations: in 3 volumes]. Moscow, Siberian Blagozvonnitsa, 2012, t. 2, 1232 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Григорий Нисский. Опровержение Евномия // Догматические сочинения. Краснодар: Текст, 2006. Т. 2. 448 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grigorij Nisskij.  The refutation of Eunomius. Dogmaticheskie sochinenija [Dogmatic writings]. Krasnodar, The text, 2006, t. 2. 448 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иоанн Дамаскин. Точное изложение православной веры // Источник знания. СПб.: Наука, 2006. 357 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ioann Damaskin. Exact statement of the Orthodox faith. Istochnik znanija [Source of knowledge.]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2006. 357 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Киприан Керн. Антропология св. Григория Паламы. Киев: Общество любителей православной литературы, 2005. 613 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kiprian Kern. Anthropology of St. Gregory Palamas. Kiev: Society of Lovers of Orthodox Literature, 2005. 613 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Карташев А.В. Вселенские Соборы. М.: Эксмо, 2006. 672 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kartashev A.V. Ecumenical Councils. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2006. 672 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лосский В.Н. Боговидение. М.: АСТ, 2003. 759 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Losskij V.N. Theophany. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 759 c. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Флоровский Г. В. Восточные отцы церкви. М.: АСТ, 2003. 637 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Florovskij G. V. Eastern Fathers of the Church. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 637 p.  (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Russell Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, page xi. Simon &amp; Schuster, 1972. P. 333.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Russell Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, page xi. Simon &amp; Schuster, 1972. P. 333.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Serafim Sobolev. New composition about Sofia of God's Wisdom. Jordanvill. N.Y. (USA): Holy Trinity Monastery, 1993. P. 269.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Serafim Sobolev. New composition about Sofia of God's Wisdom. Jordanvill. N.Y. (USA):  Holy Trinity Monastery, 1993. P. 269.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
