<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mininuniver</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Мининского университета</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik of Minin University</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2307-1281</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26795/2307-1281-2020-8-4-5</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mininuniver-1149</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЩИЕ ВОПРОСЫ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>GENERAL ISSUES OF EDUCATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Проблема надежности оценочных суждений учителя в формирующем оценивании</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The problem of the reliability of the teachers’ assessment judgments in formative assessment</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-0587</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бодоньи</surname><given-names>М. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bodony</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Бодоньи Марина Алексеевна – кандидат педагогических наук, доцент, заведующий кафедрой прикладной лингвистики и новых информационных технологий</p><p>Краснодар</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Bodony Marina A. – Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Applied Linguistics and New Information Technologies</p><p>Krasnodar</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">m.bodony@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Кубанский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kuban State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бодоньи М.А., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бодоньи М.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bodony M.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.minin-vestnik.ru/jour/article/view/1149">https://www.minin-vestnik.ru/jour/article/view/1149</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Организация учебного процесса предполагает осуществление текущей оценки, обеспечивающей поддержку учебной деятельности школьников и влияние на учебный процесс для повышения его эффективности. Одним из элементов оценочной деятельности учителя является оценочное суждение, которое формулируется учителем в текущем процессе мониторинга, диагностики, анализа и интерпретации результатов учебной деятельности учащихся и направлено на информирование учащихся о степени достижения планируемых результатов, повышение мотивации, одобрение, замечание и т.п. Изучение оценочных суждений учителя в контексте формирующего оценивания соотносится с проблематикой надежности, обеспечивающей непротиворечивость, объективность, последовательность, справедливость и стабильность результатов оценочной деятельности.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. Материал для исследования – двадцать статей, опубликованных за период с 2017 по 2020 годы и посвященных проблематике оценочных суждений учителя в ходе формирующего оценивания. Их сбор проходил в полнотекстовых базах данных опубликованных научных исследований ScienceDirect и Wiley Online Library на основе ключевых слов. Отобранные статьи были проанализированы и обобщены с точки зрения рассмотрения в них факторов, влияющих на оценочные суждения учителя и создающих условия для снижения надежности.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты исследования</title><p>Результаты исследования. В результате проведенного анализа публикаций нами были выявлены следующие группы факторов, влияющих на надежность оценочных суждений учителя: факторы, обусловленные компонентами ситуации оценки, которые включают факторы, связанные с субъектом, объектом, предметом и основанием оценки, а также с используемым средством оценивания; факторы, обусловленные оценочным суждением; внешние факторы.</p></sec><sec><title>Обсуждение и заключения</title><p>Обсуждение и заключения. Исследование факторов, влияющих на надежность оценочных суждений учителя, определяет возможности повышения эффективности оценочной деятельности в ходе формирующего оценивания. Понимание роли каждого фактора создает условия для подготовки рекомендаций для учителя по повышению надежности текущей оценки. Кроме того, на основе рассматриваемой классификации возможно проведение эмпирических исследований для уточнения специфики активизации тех или иных факторов в зависимости от целей, условий и индивидуальных характеристик всех участников учебного процесса для повышения эффективности мониторинга достижения планируемых образовательных результатов и поддержки учебного процесса. </p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. The organization of the educational process involves the implementation of ongoing assessment, which provides support for students’ educational activities and the impact on the educational process to improve its effectiveness. One of the elements of the teacher's assessment activity is an assessment judgment, which is formulated by the teacher in the current process of monitoring, diagnosing, analyzing and interpreting the results of students' learning activities and is aimed at informing students about the degree of the planned result achievement, students’ motivation, approval, remark, etc. The study of the teacher's assessment judgments in the context of formative assessment correlates with the problem of reliability, which ensures the consistency, objectivity, fairness and stability of the results of assessment activities.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Materials and Methods. The material for the research includes 20 articles published from 2017 to 2020 and devoted to the problems of teachers’ assessment judgments during the process of formative assessment. They were collected by using keywords in the full-text databases of published scientific research which were ScienceDirect and Wiley Online Library. The selected articles were analyzed and summarized from the point of view of considering the factors that influence the teacher's assessment judgments and create conditions for reducing reliability.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. As a result of the analysis of publications, we identified the following groups of factors that affect the reliability of the teacher's assessment judgments: factors caused by the components of the assessment situation, which include factors related to the subject and object of the assessment, assessment target, scope of the assessment, the basis of the assessment, as well as the use of the assessment tool; factors related to the assessment judgment; external factors.</p><p>Discussion and Conclusions. The study of the factors influencing the reliability of the teacher's assessment judgments determines the possibilities of increasing the effectiveness of the assessment activities in the process of formative assessment. Understanding the role of each factor creates conditions for preparing recommendations for the teacher to improve the reliability of the current assessment. In addition, on the basis of the classification under consideration, it is possible to conduct empirical studies to clarify the specifics of activating certain factors depending on the goals, conditions and individual characteristics of all participants of the educational process in order to increase the effectiveness of monitoring the achievements of planned educational results and support the educational process.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>формирующее оценивание</kwd><kwd>надежность оценки</kwd><kwd>оценочные суждения учителя</kwd><kwd>факторы</kwd><kwd>снижающие надежность оценки</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>formative assessment</kwd><kwd>reliability of assessment</kwd><kwd>teacher assessment judgments</kwd><kwd>factors that reduce assessment reliability</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Безрукова В.С. Основы духовной культуры (Энциклопедический словарь педагога). Екатеринбург, 2000. 937 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bezrukova V.S. Fundamentals of Spiritual Culture (Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Teacher). Ekaterinburg, 2000. 937 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бодоньи М.А. Объекты контроля и оценки иноязычной письменной речи: монография. Краснодар: КубГУ, 2018. 140 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bodon'i M.A. Objects of control and evaluation of foreign language writing: monograph. Krasnodar, KubGU Publ., 2018. 140 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ожегов С.И., Шведова Н.Ю. Толковый словарь русского языка: около 80 000 слов и фразеологических выражений. М.: А Темп, 2006. 944 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ozhegov S.I., SHvedova N.YU. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: about 80,000 words and phraseological expressions. Moscow, A Temp Publ., 2006. 944 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baudson T.G., Preckel F. Development and validation of the German Test for (Highly) Intelligent Kids – T(H)INK // European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2013. Vol. 29. Pp. 171-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000142.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baudson T.G., Preckel F. Development and validation of the German Test for (Highly) Intelligent Kids – T(H)INK. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2013, vol. 29, pp. 171-181, doi: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000142.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Campbell T. Stereotyped at Seven? Biases in Teacher Judgement of Pupils’ Ability and Attainment // Journal of Social Policy. 2015. Vol. 44(3). Pp. 517-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279415000227.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Campbell T. Stereotyped at Seven? Biases in Teacher Judgement of Pupils’ Ability and Attainment. Journal of Social Policy, 2015, vol. 44(3), pp. 517-547, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279415000227.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carr M., Kurtz‐Costes B.E. Is being smart everything? The influence of student achievement on teachers' perceptions // British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1994. Vol. 64. Pp. 263-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01101.x.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carr M., Kurtz‐Costes B.E. Is being smart everything? The influence of student achievement on teachers' perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1994, vol. 64, pp. 263-276, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01101.x.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cevik D.Y. Examining Preservice Teachers' Reasoning and Decision Making in Three Case-Based Approaches: Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Ames: Iowa State University, 2011. 408 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-3078.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cevik D.Y. Examining Preservice Teachers' Reasoning and Decision Making in Three Case-Based Approaches: Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Ames, Iowa State University, 2011. 408 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-3078.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Connor-Linton J. Looking behind the curtain: What do L2 com position ratings really mean? // TESOL Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 29. Pp. 762-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588174.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Connor-Linton J. Looking behind the curtain: What do L2 com position ratings really mean? TESOL Quarterly, 1995, vol. 29, pp. 762-765, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588174.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Drexlerová A., Šeďová K., Sedláček M. The relationship between grading and teacher judgment // Journal of Pedagogy. 2019. Vol. 10(2). Pp. 9-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jped-2019-0005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Drexlerová A., Šeďová K., Sedláček M. The relationship between grading and teacher judgment. Journal of Pedagogy, 2019, vol. 10(2), pp. 9-35, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jped-2019-0005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Engelen J.A.A., Camp G., van de Pol J., Bruin A.B.H. Teachers’ monitoring of students’ text comprehension: can students’ keywords and summaries improve teachers’ judgment accuracy? // Metacognition and Learning. 2018. Vol. 13. Pp. 287-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9187-4 .</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engelen J.A.A., Camp G., van de Pol J., Bruin A.B.H. Teachers’ monitoring of students’ text comprehension: can students’ keywords and summaries improve teachers’ judgment accuracy? Metacognition and Learning, 2018, vol. 13, pp. 287-307, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9187-4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Evans J.St.B.T. Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition // Annual Review of Psychology. 2008. Vol. 59. Pp. 255-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Evans J.St.B.T. Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, vol. 59, pp. 255-278, doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fischbach A., Baudson T.G., Preckel F., Martin R., Brunner M. Do teacher judgments of student intelligence predict life outcomes? // Learning and Individual Differences. 2013. Vol. 27. Pp. 109-119. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fischbach A., Baudson T.G., Preckel F., Martin R., Brunner M. Do teacher judgments of student intelligence predict life outcomes? Learning and Individual Differences, 2013, vol. 27, pp. 109-119, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Frank M.J., Cohen M.X., Sanfey A.G. Multiple systems in decision making: A neurocomputational perspective // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2009. Vol. 18. Pp. 73-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8721.2009.01612.x.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frank M.J., Cohen M.X., Sanfey A.G. Multiple systems in decision making: A neurocomputational perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2009, vol. 18, pp. 73-77, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8721.2009.01612.x.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glogger-Frey I. Linking teachers' professional knowledge and teachers' actions: Judgment processes, judgments and training // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018. Vol. 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glogger-Frey I. Linking teachers' professional knowledge and teachers' actions: Judgment processes, judgments and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 76, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hardman D. Judgment and decision making: Psychological perspectives. Oxford, UK: BPS-Blackwell. 2009. 221 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hardman D. Judgment and decision making: Psychological perspectives. Oxford, UK, BPS-Blackwell, 2009. 221 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harvey N. Why are judgments less consistent in less predictable task situations? // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1995. Vol. 63. Pp. 247-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1077.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harvey N. Why are judgments less consistent in less predictable task situations? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, vol. 63, pp. 247-263, doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1077.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Helm F., Müller-Kalthoff H., Mukowski R., Möller J. Teacher judgment accuracy regarding students' self-concepts: Affected by social and dimensional comparisons? // Learning and Instruction. 2018. Vol. 55. Pp. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Helm F., Müller-Kalthoff H., Mukowski R., Möller J. Teacher judgment accuracy regarding students' self-concepts: Affected by social and dimensional comparisons? Learning and Instruction, 2018, vol. 55, pp. 1-12, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herppich S., Praetorius A.-K., Foorster N., Glogger-Frey I., Karst K., Leutner, D., Südkamp A. Teachers' assessment competence: Integrating knowledge-, process-, and product-oriented approaches into a competence-oriented conceptual model // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018. Vol. 76. Pp. 181-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herppich S., Praetorius A.-K., Foorster N., Glogger-Frey I., Karst K., Leutner, D., Südkamp A. Teachers' assessment competence: Integrating knowledge-, process-, and product-oriented approaches into a competence-oriented conceptual model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 76, pp. 181-193, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jussim L., Harber K.D. Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2005. Vol. 9. Pp.131-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207%2Fs15327957pspr0902_3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jussim L., Harber K.D. Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2005, vol. 9, pp.131-155, doi: https://doi.org/10.1207%2Fs15327957pspr0902_3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaiser J., Retelsdorf J., Südkamp A., Möller J. Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments // Learning and Instruction. 2013. Vol. 28. Pp. 73-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.06.001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaiser J., Retelsdorf J., Südkamp A., Möller J. Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction, 2013, vol. 28, pp. 73-84, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.06.001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karing C. Diagnostic competence of elementary and secondary school teachers in the domains of competence and interests // German Journal of Educational Psychology. 2009. Vol. 23. Pp. 197-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.197.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karing C. Diagnostic competence of elementary and secondary school teachers in the domains of competence and interests. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 197-209, doi: https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.197.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karst K., Bonefeld M. Judgment accuracy of preservice teachers regarding student performance: The influence of attention allocation // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2020 Vol. 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103099.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karst K., Bonefeld M. Judgment accuracy of preservice teachers regarding student performance: The influence of attention allocation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2020, vol. 94, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103099.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karst K., Dotzel S., Dickhoauser O. Comparing global judgments and specific judgments of teachers about students' knowledge: Is the whole the sum of its parts? // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018. Vol. 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karst K., Dotzel S., Dickhoauser O. Comparing global judgments and specific judgments of teachers about students' knowledge: Is the whole the sum of its parts? Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 76, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kotsopoulos D., Makosz S., Zambrzycka J., Cordy M. A teacher’s judgment of spatial ability // School Science and Mathematics. 2018. Vol. 118. Pp. 320-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12300.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kotsopoulos D., Makosz S., Zambrzycka J., Cordy M. A teacher’s judgment of spatial ability. School Science and Mathematics, 2018, vol. 118, pp. 320-331, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12300.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kriegbaum K., Steinmayr R., Spinath B. Longitudinal reciprocal effects between teachers’ judgments of students’ aptitude, students’ motivation and grades in math // Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2019. Vol. 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101807.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kriegbaum K., Steinmayr R., Spinath B. Longitudinal reciprocal effects between teachers’ judgments of students’ aptitude, students’ motivation and grades in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2019, vol. 59, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101807.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loibl K., Leuders T., Doorfler T. A Framework for Explaining Teachers’ Diagnostic Judgements by Cognitive Modeling (DiaCoM) // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2020. Vol. 91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103059.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Loibl K., Leuders T., Doorfler T. A Framework for Explaining Teachers’ Diagnostic Judgements by Cognitive Modeling (DiaCoM). Teaching and Teacher Education, 2020, vol. 91, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103059.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Machts N., Kaiser J., Schmidt F.T.C., Möller J. Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis // Educational Research Review. 2016. Vol. 19(1). Pp. 85-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Machts N., Kaiser J., Schmidt F.T.C., Möller J. Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 2016, vol. 19(1), pp. 85-103, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Machts N., Zitzmann S., Möller J. Dimensionality of teacher judgments on a competency-based report card in elementary school // Learning and Instruction. 2020. Vol. 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101328.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Machts N., Zitzmann S., Möller J. Dimensionality of teacher judgments on a competency-based report card in elementary school. Learning and Instruction, 2020, vol. 67, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101328.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McKevett N.M., Kiss A.J. The influence of data on teachers' judgments of students' early reading and math skills // Psychology in the Schools. 2019. Vol. 56. Pp. 1157-1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22256.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McKevett N.M., Kiss A.J. The influence of data on teachers' judgments of students' early reading and math skills. Psychology in the Schools, 2019, vol. 56, pp. 1157-1172, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22256.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McMillan J.H. Understanding and Improving Teachers’ Classroom Assessment Decision Making: Implications for Theory and Practice // Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2005. Vol. 22(4). Pp. 34-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McMillan J.H. Understanding and Improving Teachers’ Classroom Assessment Decision Making: Implications for Theory and Practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2005, vol. 22(4), pp. 34-43, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oudman S., van de Pol J., Bakker A., Moerbeek M., van Gog T. Effects of different cue types on the accuracy of primary school teachers' judgments of students' mathematical understanding // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018. Vol. 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.02.007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oudman S., van de Pol J., Bakker A., Moerbeek M., van Gog T. Effects of different cue types on the accuracy of primary school teachers' judgments of students' mathematical understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 76, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.02.007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paleczek L., Seifert S., Gasteigere-Klicpera B. Influences on teachers' judgment accuracy of reading abilities on second and third grade students: A multilevel analysis // Psychology in the Schools. 2017. Vol. 54(3). Pp. 228-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Paleczek L., Seifert S., Gasteigere-Klicpera B. Influences on teachers' judgment accuracy of reading abilities on second and third grade students: A multilevel analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 2017, vol. 54(3), pp. 228-245, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Panadero E., Broadbent J., Boud D., Lodge J.M. Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: the role of evaluative judgement // European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2019. Vol. 34. Pp. 535-557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Panadero E., Broadbent J., Boud D., Lodge J.M. Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: the role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2019, vol. 34, pp. 535-557, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Payne J.W., Bettman J.R. Walking with the scarecrow: The information processing approach to decision research // Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. Pp. 110-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937.ch6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Payne J.W., Bettman J.R. Walking with the scarecrow: The information processing approach to decision research. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Malden, MA, Blackwell Publishing, 2004. Pp. 110-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937.ch6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pfeiffer S.I., Jarosewich T. The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, race, and diagnostic efficiency // Gifted Child Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 51. Pp. 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0016986206296658.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pfeiffer S.I., Jarosewich T. The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, race, and diagnostic efficiency. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2007, vol. 51, pp. 39-50, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0016986206296658.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pielmeier M., Huber S., Seidel T. Is teacher judgment accuracy of students’ characteristics beneficial for verbal teacher-student interactions in classroom? // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018. Vol. 76. Pp. 255-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pielmeier M., Huber S., Seidel T. Is teacher judgment accuracy of students’ characteristics beneficial for verbal teacher-student interactions in classroom? Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 76, pp. 255-266, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schwab S., Alnahdi G.H. Teachers’ Judgments of Students’ School-Wellbeing, Social Inclusion, and Academic Self-Concept: A Multi-Trait-Multimethod Analysis Using the Perception of Inclusion Questionnaire // Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 11. P. 1498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01498.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schwab S., Alnahdi G.H. Teachers’ Judgments of Students’ School-Wellbeing, Social Inclusion, and Academic Self-Concept: A Multi-Trait-Multimethod Analysis Using the Perception of Inclusion Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, vol. 11, p. 1498, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01498.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thiede K.W., Brendefur J.L., Carney M.B., Champion J., Turner L., Stewart R., Osguthorpe R.D. Improving the accuracy of teachers' judgments of student learning // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018. Vol. 76. Pp. 106-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thiede K.W., Brendefur J.L., Carney M.B., Champion J., Turner L., Stewart R., Osguthorpe R.D. Improving the accuracy of teachers' judgments of student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 76, pp. 106-115, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thiede K.W., Oswalt S., Brendefur J.L., Carney M.B., Osguthorpe R.D. Teachers’ Judgments of Student Learning of Mathematics // The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education. Ohio Publisher: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp. 678-695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.027.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thiede K.W., Oswalt S., Brendefur J.L., Carney M.B., Osguthorpe R.D. Teachers’ Judgments of Student Learning of Mathematics. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education. Ohio Publisher, Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp. 678-695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.027.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vögelina C., Jansen Th., Keller S.D., Machts N., Möller J. The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays // Assessing Writing. 2019. Vol. 39. Pp. 50-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vögelina C., Jansen Th., Keller S.D., Machts N., Möller J. The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays. Assessing Writing, 2019, vol. 39, pp. 50-63, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhu Ch., Urhahne D. The use of learner response systems in the classroom enhances teachers' judgment accuracy // Learning and Instruction. 2018. Vol. 58. Pp. 255-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhu Ch., Urhahne D. The use of learner response systems in the classroom enhances teachers' judgment accuracy. Learning and Instruction, 2018, vol. 58, pp. 255-262, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
